Samsung Galaxy S III first press image appears, announcement set for May 22nd?

27. cheetah2k posted on 05 Apr 2012, 03:45 8

... well well. Samsung did say they wanted to create a phone that "defined our era".... They may well have just done that.

38. TheOldOne posted on 05 Apr 2012, 07:11 2

Another fake, unfortunately. As someone else pointed out, the "Galaxy SIII" writing looks photoshoped: the third I seems to be added artificially next to the first two. If you look carefully, they are not evenly separated, which means is was added later to the "Galaxy S II".

Something like that will never be released in an official Samsung statement.

"take this with a grain of salt."? No... take it with a lot!

41. lonelyw posted on 05 Apr 2012, 07:24 3

it is the end of a stainless steel spoon man!!!!!!

• This comment is posted in response to #38 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #38 Hide

44. TROLL.ISAHA (banned) posted on 05 Apr 2012, 07:43 0

4412 it's still an A9 A15 Quadcore please Samsung
il'e wait.....

• This comment is posted in response to #38 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #38 Hide

53. remixfa posted on 05 Apr 2012, 10:05 0

the quad a9 is as powerful as the dual a15. both are 2x faster than the current 4410. nothing to sneeze at

• This comment is posted in response to #44 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #44 Hide

73. bobfreking55 posted on 07 Apr 2012, 09:16 0

http://bit.ly/Ihn8OP black version SGS3 render.

• This comment is posted in response to #53 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #53 Hide

74. remixfa posted on 07 Apr 2012, 09:41 0

where is my dark blue render bob????? lol i want a metallic dark blue render!! :)

• This comment is posted in response to #73 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #73 Hide

75. bobfreking55 posted on 09 Apr 2012, 06:01 1

http://bit.ly/HruNyR sorry bout the sides. can't manage to fix it in short time. :)

• This comment is posted in response to #74 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #74 Hide

76. remixfa posted on 09 Apr 2012, 08:10 0

not too shabby.. but it needs to be more navy and more metallic! :) lolz. thanks for doing that :)

• This comment is posted in response to #75 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #75 Hide

18. Ubi2447 posted on 05 Apr 2012, 02:35 9

Agreed. Im in the same boat...

PS
Nice Scott Pilgrim avatar +1

42. SuperAndroidEvo posted on 05 Apr 2012, 07:31 6

I am skipping the Samsung Galaxy S III, what I REALLY want is the Samsung Galaxy Note 2. That is going to be Samsung's real monster, just like the Samsung Galaxy Note killed the Samsung Galaxy S II. Bigger Super AMOLED+ 720p HD screen for me please!

43. SleepingOz posted on 05 Apr 2012, 07:40 3

Same here but the GNote is not actually considered as a phone. Well, at least not by everyone so..

49. SuperAndroidEvo posted on 05 Apr 2012, 08:45 6

I consider it a phone because you can make calls on it though a mobile carrier, not through Skype or something similar.

To me the Samsung Galaxy S III will set the president to how insane the Samsung Galaxy Note 2 will be. To me the best phone Samsung has right now spec wise is the Samsung Galaxy Note. That is some beast of a phone.

Imagine if they put an A15 Exynos quad-core inside the Galaxy Note 2 with a sweet 2GB of RAM. They could because they Note 2 would be so much bigger, thus more room to tinker with!

• This comment is posted in response to #43 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #43 Hide

52. remixfa posted on 05 Apr 2012, 10:03 5

if that happened then I'd have to trade in my sgs3. lol

4.8 inches could be done if it was a button free design. it would be close to 4.6 inches of usable space that way.

gimmie gimmie!

• This comment is posted in response to #49 Show
• This comment is posted in response to #49 Hide

46. PhoneArenaUser posted on 05 Apr 2012, 07:55 9

And it is damn fake! :P

Look at the SAMSUNG Galaxy S II promo picture:http://goo.gl/vUybc
It is copy & paste + I

51. -box- posted on 05 Apr 2012, 08:54 1

...why does it look like a smoother Nokia C7? Not a bad thing (I own a C7) but it looks uninspired

64. SleepingOz posted on 05 Apr 2012, 14:44 3

It'll own your c7 in every way.

19. Ubi2447 posted on 05 Apr 2012, 02:36 4

I pray to jeebus that this comes to Verizon. PLEASE DONT SCREW THIS ONE UP VERIZON. The Droid branding just isn't cutting it much any more.

I just can't keep waiting for Verizon to get their act together and put out a good Quad-Core 4g phone.
Might try to find one of these bad boys unlocked if its not like a billion dollars (which it probably will be)

47. JunitoNH posted on 05 Apr 2012, 08:15 1

Lol if it comes to Verizon you already know it, priced around $399.

40. roscuthiii posted on 05 Apr 2012, 07:18 2

Begin? Sadly, I already finished...
:-(

31. asimo posted on 05 Apr 2012, 04:58 10

the 'dark side' connotation is too cool for that company.
Prefer the 'wool side'

34. B3BLW29 posted on 05 Apr 2012, 06:16 6

hahaha Two fruit Ninjas didn't like my comment ;)

28. RaKithAPeiRiZ posted on 05 Apr 2012, 03:46 1

looks like a smooth version of the xperia arc

32. troutsy posted on 05 Apr 2012, 05:31 3

I think they'd be more likely to put a chrome plating over top of the ceramic body than a ceramic coating over a metal body.

Good observation though!

22. android_hitman posted on 05 Apr 2012, 03:01 3

because it's not working on Iphones and Ipads

29. KingKurogiii posted on 05 Apr 2012, 04:04 1

ah, i see, you're absolutely right. good eye. it's a shame people do things like this. i thought that was a gorgeous device.

45. cellphonator posted on 05 Apr 2012, 07:43 0

Wow, you got it, very good eye!

54. dhruba posted on 05 Apr 2012, 10:12 3

i m trying to believe u r serious