• Home
  • News
  • AT&T has left its signal out of San Francisco

AT&T has left its signal out of San Francisco

Posted: , by Alan F.

Categories: Bookmark

Share:

Discuss 17
AT&T has left its signal out of San Francisco
Just the other day we reported on how even AT&T had to admit that its service in Manhattan and San Francisco was not up to snuff . The carrier said that they would be working on improving the service in those locations. Now it could just be that our definition of  "improve" is the opposite of AT&T's, but  the wireless operator is having problems in the city by the Golden Gate Bridge. According to AT&T, "We are seeing a hardware issue in downtown San Francisco that is causing some degradation in service. GSM and EDGE voice and data services are still accessible. Our experts are aware and working to resolve as quickly as possible. Further resolution is expected this evening."

An AT&T customer named Martin Hecko sent out a Tweet saying that he was told that the carrier's data and SMS services were down in the city and would be back up in 24 to 48 hours. Meanwhile, some are reporting that service is back in the area. If you are an AT&T customer in San Francisco, see if you can pull yourself away from the Warrior game for a second and let us know if your cellular service is running at full strength.

source: TechCrunch, Twitter via EngadgetMobile

AT&T has left its signal out of San Francisco
AT&T has left its signal out of San Francisco

Share:

Discuss17

17 Comments

1. HatedaIphone posted on 20 Oct 2010, 01:44

Is any one surprised ? LoL GayT&T = FAIL !

2. vzwman posted on 12 Dec 2009, 07:38

LOL gayt&t LOL

3. jundibasam posted on 12 Dec 2009, 09:20

sad thing is that most AT&T customers probably aren't even aware that there is an issue with data ongoing right now since they're quite used to having little to no data conections at all (sans WiFi of course). Its like a blind person not noticing the power is out. poor AT&T

4. vzw fanman posted on 12 Dec 2009, 10:31

If I had this problem with Gayt&t I would switch to Verizon.

5. artz1986 posted on 12 Dec 2009, 10:55

This happened yesterday and was resolved yesterday. Why is it 'news' today?

6. HatedaIphone posted on 12 Dec 2009, 11:57

Just a weekly reminder of how shitty Gayt&t 's service is Buddy, just a reminder.lol

7. Gsmalltheway posted on 12 Dec 2009, 16:28

Ha all you verizon fanboys are so funny. You do all you can to mock at&t but the funny thing is you cant even use 90% of the phones in this website cause you have crap CDMA. hahaha

9. vzw fanman posted on 12 Dec 2009, 16:45

i'm happy with the droid, and wouldn't want any other phone.

10. vzwman posted on 12 Dec 2009, 21:05

With the Droid you are 100% in control their is no limitations it's call Android LOL gayt&t LOL

12. Gsmalltheway posted on 13 Dec 2009, 11:32

And you think android is a Verizon thing?haha I too have android (HTC real Hero) and will be getting the X10 as soon as it comes oult.

13. Gsmalltheway posted on 13 Dec 2009, 11:34

Umm I'm pretty sure the X10 will kill any Verizon Android phone.

15. vzw fanman posted on 13 Dec 2009, 12:19

i'm not a fan on non verizon phones. and now that i'm using a physical qwerty keyboard i dont think ill go back to an all touch screen.

17. omarc26 posted on 13 Dec 2009, 12:59

even if the x10 is an awesome phone on t-mobile or at&t i would never switch to them cause i like having signal everywhere i go .i had at&t and t-mobile n there are alot of places like montana for example were at&t and t-mobile are no service while verizon has 5 bars of reception also in the grand canyon at&t and t-mobile are always searching while verizon has full reception if gsm is so great how come they dont offer service in those places?? cdma phones on verizon and sprint works just fine.. i care bout reception thats why i have verizon n i have a droid its not that bad.

8. Imallvol7 posted on 12 Dec 2009, 16:45

Geez it's hilarious watching people fight over Verizon and AT&T.

11. vzwman posted on 12 Dec 2009, 21:06

LOL GAYT&T LOL

14. BBBOY posted on 13 Dec 2009, 11:49

All of you knock on AT&T. I actually find AT&T to be really reliable. My AT&T phone works as well as my verizon phone. I had many places where my verizon phone had no service but the AT&T phone had great coverage. And in the end it all comes down to what your coverage looks like so why do a lot of people insist bashing AT&T? They are mad that AT&T doesn't have good coverage in their area so they can't get the iPhone. :)

16. AZNphoneGeek posted on 13 Dec 2009, 12:42

hey Gsmalltheway... yeah gsm has some benefits but the obvious fact is, even though ATT is a gsm company, it doesn't make them better. SINFULTA posted this the other day Dec 10th in response to a similar argument... "When we did chipset testing on different networks in the SF Bay Area a few months ago, Verizon's data EVDO network during peak time @430pm was only running at 8% of capacity on average, TMobile was at 19%, Sprint at 8.x % (Can't remember, and don't have the sheet infront of me), and ATT's was at 78%. Regardless of what people say CDMA can withstand a ton of more subscribers and bandwith on almost everywhere we tested with my company Qualcomm. It's funny all these arguements about how it's Iphone fault. More-so ATT's fault for no preparing, Tmobiles tested fair by comparison. So I dunno. MSM9200 Chipsets were being tested." ATT's network is being pegged right now with iphone and other heavy data users. people are claiming left and right on phones and service and this and that. what it really boils down to most of the time is not handset but carrier. as for their lack of service in the bay, haha.... that's just old news.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

All content (phone reviews, news, specs, info), design and layouts are Copyright 2001-2012 phoneArena.com. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part or in any form or medium without written permission is prohibited!
Privacy | Terms of use