AT&T continues 4G LTE network expansion effort
A quick recap – while still officially behind Verizon in terms of total LTE coverage, No. 2 in the US reportedly covers over 292 million people throughout 300 markets. Pretty impressive considering that the total population of the US of A is estimated at about 314 million. Moreover, in a recent countrywide drive-through, PCMag released the results of its annual network testing – on average AT&T won over Verizon and any other in terms of actual LTE speeds in urban areas (Verizon fared better in rural regions).
The newest markets to get the green light on lightning fast connectivity are:
- Minot, North Dakota
- Warren County, New Jersey
- Visalia-Porterville, California
- Brainerd Lakes, Minnesota
- Jackson County, Georgia
- Batesburg-Leesville, South Carolina
- Mount Vernon, Ohio
1. Dadler22 (Posts: 161; Member since: 11 Dec 2008)
why add LTE when you already pretend to already have 4G LOLZ
8. Quezdagreat (Posts: 411; Member since: 05 Apr 2012)
hspa is considered 4g in America. lte is much faster
3. dvcgoofy (Posts: 1; Member since: 26 Jun 2013)
Here in central MA a Verizon LTE device got me a whopping 1.5 mps download speed while AT&T's non LTE 4G on a similar device ran 10 mps download speed. (HSPA+)
Closer to Worcester AT&T's LTE ran higher - 25 mps and up. So the article is correct; at least for my area.
5. Gemmol (Posts: 489; Member since: 09 Nov 2011)
yeah AT&T is getting better, its like I said before in Virginia they were horrible, but now if you go out there, you getting better service then most
9. Omarc07 (Posts: 233; Member since: 12 Nov 2012)
same over here in los angeles att was horrible in 2008-2010 now it improved alot lte is faster here than verizon lte i have zero dropped calls have signal in places were friends with verizon have no service.
4. Gemmol (Posts: 489; Member since: 09 Nov 2011)
Keep doing it AT&T make us consumer's more happy, now just bring back that option to upgrade early and everything is perfect........its like I told before in a post before, AT&T is the best because their signals work better because it go thru the walls.....I told yall already tmobile, metro pcs and sprint do not work in my house in brooklyn......Verizon get 1 to 2 bars but in the basement it get nothing, but once you get outside the Verizon phone get back all its bars, it just sucks inside, so everyone in my building have AT&T
6. belovedson (Posts: 830; Member since: 30 Nov 2010)
But........ Verizon gets better data connection and penetrator in deep buildings. I have both Verizon and attachments. ATT had better Verizon has much better coverage for data. Also nob 5gb cap
7. Rager722 (Posts: 125; Member since: 30 Jan 2013)
I live in Brooklyn too, I use At&t as well, while my friends have Sprint (Virgin Mobile) and T-Mobile and they get deadzones in their house! smh! At&t works underground in the subways at points too
10. VictorP (Posts: 24; Member since: 29 May 2013)
Here in Boise, ID at&t's LTE is twice as fast if not 3 times faster then Century Links internet. I get 30-42mbs on my iPhone 5 and my GS4. Where on my computer I get 12-15 with century link.
11. miamiheatfan6 (Posts: 2; Member since: 27 Jun 2013)
great coverage here in west palm beach Florida 30-40 MBS on my galaxy note 2 ..sprints coverage sucks here and T-Mobile and metro pcs verzion is OK .but at&t is faster here.. my phone internet is faster then my home Comcast 6-12 ...
12. tiberius183 (Posts: 8; Member since: 16 Jan 2012)
4G LTE just went live yesterday here in Bremerton, WA!