FCC is receiving complaints from Verizon subscribers who want to keep their landlines

The carrier wants to pull out copper networks and replace them with fiber or wireless

Alan Friedman
By
Alan Friedman
Verizon logo in red against white background.
Verizon wants to replace copper networks with fiber or wireless | Image by Verizon
0
Verizon is trying to get the FCC to approve its request to end POTS. No, it has nothing to do with the carrier selling cannabis. POTS is an acronym for "Plain Old Telephone Service." You know, the old analog copper-wire network used with ancient landline telephones.

Verizon asked the FCC for permission to pull copper networks from nine states


Recently, Verizon asked the FCC for permission to discontinue POTS in nine states (Arizona, Delaware, New Jersey, New Mexico, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Utah, and Virginia). Verizon wants to remove the copper network for customers who have access to an FCC-approved replacement service such as fiber or wireless.

The goal is to offer certain services to Verizon customers that require lower latency and faster data speeds that are not available from copper networks. The carrier was expecting to get the green light from the FCC a couple of weeks ago, but the regulatory agency said that it needed additional time to determine whether consumers upset about losing their copper networks had legitimate complaints.

The carrier spoke individually with some subscribers who complained to the FCC about the proposed change


In an attempt to placate the FCC, Verizon told the agency in a letter sent yesterday that "Verizon government affairs and policy team members are calling each identified customer in these states who expressed concern about the discontinuance in this (FCC) docket or to Verizon."

Recommended For You


Verizon told the FCC in its letter that it has informed some of its subscribers concerned about losing "POTS" not to worry. The company called these subscribers to reassure them that they will be keeping their older copper-based networks. Customers who do not have access to an adequate replacement to "POTS" will stay with the copper networks since their reliable analog landlines cannot be replaced by digital fiber or wireless services.

Some Verizon customers were reassured that they will not lose their landlines right now


Some customers will lose their old landlines. Verizon will review these locations within a month after that transition. At that time, if it is determined that FCC-approved replacement service is not available at a certain location, the carrier will restore the customer's service over copper until a replacement becomes available.


The FCC continues to receive comments from Verizon customers who don't want the wireless firm to stop offering POTS. One such comment, from someone without wireless service on his property, said, "If Verizon discontinues copper-wire phone lines, our family will not have access to emergency services if the power goes out, which happens frequently."

The carrier has FCC approval to remove its copper networks in 13 states


Verizon has also filed with the FCC to remove copper networks from nine other states including California, Michigan and New York. The agency already approved Verizon's proposal to remove the copper networks in 13 states such as Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Mississippi, Tennessee and Texas.

Verizon wants to replace the copper networks since they are not cost efficient. They are very expensive to operate and even though some of the carrier's subscribers are fearful of losing their landline, most of them are happy with more modern telecommunication technology.

Mint Mobile's 6-month plans now cost $10/mo
$10 /mo
$35
$25 off (71%)
Mint Mobile is celebrating its 10-year anniversary with a special offer on its six-month subscription plans. For a limited time, you can get your preferred tier (6GB, 17GB, 23GB or unlimited) for just $10/mo. That saves you between 50% and 71% on the carrier's mobile plans, making it way easier to recommend.
Buy at Mint Mobile
PhoneArena Recommends
COMMENTS (0)