AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon defeat a common foe
Who knew Asus had beef with the Big Three?
Ericsson and Nokia were also involved. | Image by PhoneArena
It's tough being AT&T, T-Mobile, or Verizon. When the Big Three aren't spending a fortune on spectrum or snipping cables to thwart hackers, they are usually in court fending off another lawsuit.
Recently, they walked away winners in a case brought by Taiwanese electronics manufacturer Asus.
If you didn't think these companies belonged in the same sentence, your logic is sound. After all, doesn't Asus make consumer goods like ROG laptops and smartphones? What beef could it possibly have with the Big Three?
Well, it turns out Asus has been playing a bigger game. The company contributed to the research and development of cellular standards, giving it ownership of standard essential patents (SEPs). These patents cover inventions that cannot be bypassed when implementing a cellular standard.
That's how AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile ended up in its crosshairs.
Asus sued AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon in 2023 for infringing on its patents related to the 4G and 5G tech. The carriers were accused of violating the patents through their use of Ericsson and Nokia network equipment.
A federal jury in Texas rejected the claims entirely. Ericsson and Nokia were also found not liable for failing to uphold licensing obligations to Asus. The case backfired, with the jury determining that Asus breached its fair-licensing obligations to all five companies.
The legal fight took plenty of twists and turns, with both sides hurling accusations at each other. At one point, Asus accused the Big Three of ganging up to avoid paying reasonable licensing fees. We know all too well that the three aren't above teaming up when faced with a common enemy, even if they spend the rest of their time tearing each other down.
Unfazed by the threats, the carriers, Ericsson, and Nokia fought back, claiming Asus hadn't even invented the technology at the heart of the dispute. Bet Asus didn't see that coming.
Asus was seeking $436 million in damages.
Had Asus won, there could have been many consequences for the carriers. In addition to damages, Asus could have asked for royalties for continued use of the technology. If things got messier, an injunction could have required them to stop using the disputed technologies.
The case is yet another reminder of how complicated the telecom business is. Who knew simply using network equipment could lead to a years-long legal fight?
Recently, they walked away winners in a case brought by Taiwanese electronics manufacturer Asus.
Why was Asus after AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon?
If you didn't think these companies belonged in the same sentence, your logic is sound. After all, doesn't Asus make consumer goods like ROG laptops and smartphones? What beef could it possibly have with the Big Three?
That's how AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile ended up in its crosshairs.
Read about other recent carrier court drama
Exonerated on all counts
Asus sued AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon in 2023 for infringing on its patents related to the 4G and 5G tech. The carriers were accused of violating the patents through their use of Ericsson and Nokia network equipment.
A federal jury in Texas rejected the claims entirely. Ericsson and Nokia were also found not liable for failing to uphold licensing obligations to Asus. The case backfired, with the jury determining that Asus breached its fair-licensing obligations to all five companies.
Who should have won?
79 Votes
Carriers
45.57%
Asus
22.78%
I don't know, but I appreciate Asus more now
31.65%
Long legal battle
The legal fight took plenty of twists and turns, with both sides hurling accusations at each other. At one point, Asus accused the Big Three of ganging up to avoid paying reasonable licensing fees. We know all too well that the three aren't above teaming up when faced with a common enemy, even if they spend the rest of their time tearing each other down.
Unfazed by the threats, the carriers, Ericsson, and Nokia fought back, claiming Asus hadn't even invented the technology at the heart of the dispute. Bet Asus didn't see that coming.
Asus was seeking $436 million in damages.
Sidestepping challenges
Had Asus won, there could have been many consequences for the carriers. In addition to damages, Asus could have asked for royalties for continued use of the technology. If things got messier, an injunction could have required them to stop using the disputed technologies.
Intricacies
The case is yet another reminder of how complicated the telecom business is. Who knew simply using network equipment could lead to a years-long legal fight?
Popular stories
Latest News
Things that are NOT allowed:
To help keep our community safe and free from spam, we apply temporary limits to newly created accounts: