Sprint asks FCC to sign off on Softbank deal
posted by Alan F. / Nov 16, 2012, 4:10 PM
Department of Justice also needs to approve the acquisition. Unlike the heavily contested AT&T proposal to purchase T-Mobile, which the DOJ fought tooth and nail to prevent, the Softbank acquisition doesn't remove a major U.S. carrier from the scene. As a result, most observers expect no objection from the FCC and DOJ to Softbank's acquisition of the vast majority of Sprint. In addition, with over 25% of the company changing hands, Sprint needs a declaratory ruling to close the deal. Softbank plans on making a capital injection of $8 billion which Sprint will use to help build out its LTE network.
Before AT&T eventually decided not to pursue the T-Mobile acquisition, the biggest critic of the deal was Sprint and its CEO Dan Hesse. Whether it is revenge or not, AT&T seems to be the largest naysayer regarding Softbank's acquisition of Sprint, saying that the Japanese firm will have control over too much spectrum if the deal is allowed to close.
source: Reuters via Phonescoop
Posts: 216; Member since: Jul 07, 2012
I agree. Sprint having too much spectrum is madness, obviously AT&T is the only worthy carrier! It will surely help it emphasize the hell out of being "the nation's largest 4G network" even more! This acquisition is going to be approved because it doesn't affect domestic competition in the way AT&T's [failed] acquisition of T-Mo. would have, whether AT&T whines about it because it's blind to it or not doesn't matter.
posted on Nov 16, 2012, 4:20 PM 3
Posts: 645; Member since: Oct 23, 2011
Sprint having too much spectrum? Since when? They are turning over control to the Japanese firm for 8 Billion, Sprint won't be gaining any spectrum just money since they shelled out 15Billion for the iPhone deal. Are you having schizophrenic issues your first statement is the polar opposite of the latter...you feeling ok mate?
posted on Nov 16, 2012, 5:00 PM 0
Posts: 26; Member since: Feb 08, 2012
sprint sucks anyway
posted on Nov 16, 2012, 5:44 PM 3
Posts: 6330; Member since: Mar 31, 2010
Again, you are all missing the point - comprehension is a wonderful thing. AT&T is concerned that a FOREIGN company would have a lot of control over U.S. spectrum (and that being of Sprint's spectrum) - they are not complaining about how much spectrum Sprint has. Again, AT&T, supposedly, is concerned over a foreign country having control of too much U.S. spectrum.
posted on Nov 16, 2012, 7:07 PM 1
Posts: 216; Member since: Jul 07, 2012
Or it's using it as a front to the actual reason it opposes the acquisition which is that it's butthurt and doesn't want Sprint to have any possibility of becoming the nation's 2nd largest carrier. I doubt AT&T would lose the #2 spot despite the acquisition happening anyway. Better safe than sorry though.
posted on Nov 16, 2012, 7:53 PM 1
Posts: 271; Member since: Apr 05, 2011
Still not sure how I feel about this as a Sprint customer. They need money to build out their network. I totally agree, I mean how could you not! But is this a good was to go? Not sure. But it might be the only way to get it done.
posted on Nov 17, 2012, 10:30 AM 0
Posts: 309; Member since: Sep 11, 2011
Sprint's network just plain sucks period. Network vision is a joke and I'm pretty sure once their LTE upgrade is done it will be the slowest and most unreliable of the Big 3 just like WiMax was and TMO's network will still be faster. I can't wait until my contract is up. Sprint has nice phones but they are unusable on that POS network. I know some of you will get offended like I'm talking about your grandma but get over it. Been a customer for 11 years and this last 5 or 6 have been brutal.
posted on Nov 17, 2012, 10:58 AM 1
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):