Huawei's uphill battle for brand recognition

This article may contain personal views and opinion from the author.

There's a lot to say about a product that's instantly recognizable to consumers, especially when there's no description whatsoever to indicate who it's from or what it is. Somehow, people just know, which goes to show the magical powers of having strong brand recognition. It seldom develops in a short span of time, but it can happen quickly. Some companies end up working tirelessly to build up their brand, while others stumble onto something that ends up rapidly building momentum.

Chinese telecom equipment provider and handset maker Huawei has been on this uphill battle for quite some time, attempting to establish its brand recognition in the US. Sure, the company might have a solid base and notoriety in other major markets around the world – in fact, Huawei takes up the number three spot globally, trailing only Apple and Samsung! But here in the US, it remains an enigma to most consumers. Ask anyone if they've heard of Huawei, and chances are they probably haven't – unless they're diehard gadget geeks. It didn't help that AT&T and Verizon recently backed away from deals that would've brought Huawei's devices into carrier stores, but that's just one of many tangles with adversity that Huawei has faced throughout the years. 

Starting off as a cost-conscious alternative

Huawei has been making and selling phones in the US for a long time, even through carriers, but most people aren't aware of this since the phones were sold under different brands. In fact, Huawei's arrival really began to take shape back in 2010, when its devices were sold under the carriers' names. The AT&T Impulse 4G and T-Mobile Comet are two examples of that, as they were really smartphones made by Huawei.

Many of those early devices that Huawei released were cost-conscious alternatives for consumers who were looking to land their first smartphone. Rather than tackling the goliaths directly, Huawei's strategy back then was largely isolated to these low-cost offerings. The uphill battle that the company faced back then was just trying to get its foot in the door, and for the majority of phones it manufactured, you could say that they came off cheap – and I'm talking about things like how the seams in its phones were coming apart out of the box, or when they had that toyish feel to them.

Now, that's not the kind of impression you want to make if you're after some ambitious long-term goals. But still, it brings us to the foundational principles that still reverberate through the company's lineup. It was offering low-cost phones that could appeal to a wider range of consumers, as opposed to flagship-caliber stuff that commands a hefty cost of ownership despite generating the most interest.

Initial breakthrough success

During the period between 2010 and 2013, Huawei had very little to offer that appealed to me – or gadget hounds in general. However, things eventually started to take a shape for the company by the time mid-2013 rolled around, as we began to see a shift in its product lineup. This time, it seemed as though Huawei was increasingly investing more into the development of its smartphones, culminating in the Huawei Ascend Mate.

Not surprisingly, it followed the trends that were being proliferated during that time – so that meant going with that "phablet" form-factor, which was being dominated by Samsung. I can recall how the Huawei Ascend Mate, and subsequently its successor as well, really managed to come into my radar with a compelling package. Again, Huawei's strategy was to bring something comparable to its rivals' prized phones, but at the fraction of the cost. And for the most part, they succeeded in that regard during this period.

Slowly making noise in the market, Huawei undoubtedly had a lot of competition in the US market. And unfortunately, most of its major smartphone releases never saw the light of day here stateside. Naturally, this didn't help Huawei with attempting to increase its brand recognition. What's remarkable, though, is that Huawei still faced the same problem it's having now. Certain doors might have been locked, but this adversity didn't slow down Huawei's ambition – but rather, the experience helped to catapult them into a new, more ambitious direction.

Doors open up to online channels

Huawei's problem of selling phones directly though carrier stores has been ongoing since they basically first broke into the US smartphone market. With the launch of the Ascend Mate 2, however, Huawei took the matter into its own hands by selling the smartphone directly to US consumers using its online retail store – as opposed to consumers being forced to import devices overseas. Having an online store where devices were readily available for purchase definitely alleviated the pain of importing, but much like most new ventures, it only required some time before sales were expanded.

Initially, Huawei's online store was the only outlet for US consumers to possibly consider buying a device, but the expansion came in the form of establishing relationships with many of the major online retailers. If Huawei couldn't sell its phones through the carriers, they did the next best thing by going directly to these other retail outlets. From Amazon to Best Buy, Huawei intended to increase its brand awareness, as well as its brand recognition, by establishing these relationships.

While this is the best solution for Huawei to get its name out there, it's still relatively limiting because the US market is vastly different from other places. Consumers still rely largely on carriers when it comes to buying phones, so there's been obviously a huge missed opportunity for Huawei.

Time to go flagship level

Selling low-cost phones might be the best way to appeal to the widest audience initially, but it does very little to enhance one's brand recognition. Huawei knew that the only way for people to notice them was to go big, and by that, we mean taking it to the flagship level. Lo and behold, that certainly became the case by the time they launched the Huawei Ascend P6 in the summer of 2013.

As I mentioned earlier, the reputation of Huawei's devices early on was that they were cheap – and their designs and build qualities indicated just that! When the Ascend P6 was announced and subsequently released, a lot of people began to take Huawei a bit more seriously, seeing that they were starting to encroach into that flagship range. Gone was the boring designs and plastic constructions of its previous efforts, now replaced by something more substantial and premium, which are qualities that help devices obtain that flagship designation.

More importantly, though, the subsequent phones that were released then up to until now have all shown incremental improvements that help Huawei establish its brand in a broader level. It showed us that Huawei had the talent, ambition, and expectation to play with the big boys. And its high-end devices managed to hold their ground against the competition.

Entering the PC market

Expansion is the inevitable strategy for any business to continue thriving, so it wasn't a surprise that Huawei decided to enter the PC market beginning in 2016 with the release of its Windows 10 tablet; the Huawei MateBook. Considering that there are fewer restrictions with Windows based PCs than there are with smartphones, this was a logical move for Huawei to help increase its brand recognition.

Although they're regarded as a newcomer in the PC space, Huawei has been able to generate substantial interest with its line of Windows based tablets and laptops. Take for example the Huawei Matebook and Matebook X Pro, which are intended to compete directly against things like Microsoft's Surface Pro 2-in-1 tablets and Apple's line of MacBook Air ultra-portables. And so far, its offerings have been successful by continuing with the company's principle of offering premium devices without the premium cost.

Longtime reports of spying

Huawei has undoubtedly come a long way since 2010, and as the company continues to face new challenges, its reputation is constantly under the microscope. So, while they continue to push forward in increasing their brand recognition in the US market, there has been this shroud that has been following them with each turn. That shroud is the numerous allegations of Huawei spying and collecting information for the needs of the Chinese government.

Citing national security concerns, it's this exact reason why the National Security Agency has gone on to warn US consumers against using Huawei products. This has been an ongoing issue that has followed Huawei through its lows and highs, in its attempt to break the barrier and have its phones sold by US carriers. While the allegations have mitigated Huawei's presence stateside, it hasn't dramatically affected its bottom line when it comes to being a telecommunications giant.

Nevertheless, the idea of a phone being used to spy and gather information for purposes unknown is troublesome – kind of the situation that played out at the end of Chris Nolan's "The Dark Knight," where phones were illegally tapped into for Batman to trace the Joker's location. Yes, that might be all fiction, but there's a certain level of realism that's playing out with these allegations that would make most people second guess about buying a particular brand of smartphones.

Building confidence

You could say that it's been a roller coaster ride for Huawei, as each time they achieved new heights, they found themselves going back down that hill. Even though Huawei invested a ton on its marketing campaign over this most recent holiday season to tell US consumers about "the best phone you've never heard of," it ultimately falls on them to restore confidence in the brand. Those allegations of spying no doubt weigh heavily down on them, but they have the keys to unlock the door that's barring them from really pushing forward in the US market.

It's utterly amazing how the landscape has transformed since 2010 when Huawei seemingly broke onto the scene. Some of the established brands that were huge then, like HTC, Motorola, and BlackBerry, no longer have the same level of market share right now. Huawei, on the other hand, has seen its share continually rising – albeit, it's going to take some serious work to overcome their current predicament.

Huawei's smartphones have come a long way since those days, so despite the uphill battle they've always been facing with building up their brand recognition, they've done a solid job in delivering fantastic gadgets that don't have too many compromises – while still following their principle of undercutting somewhat when it comes to price. And that's the thing, they've been really good at competing in different segments of the market by undercutting the competition in the structure of pricing.

Only time will tell whether or not they'll achieve the same status as Samsung and Apple in the smartphone market. Getting there is no tough cookie, which is something that Huawei is desperate to achieve. It's quite apparent that the door has been closed with its deals with AT&T and Verizon, but the keys are in Huawei's hands to unlock. It'll no doubt be interesting to see how it all plays out for the rest of the year, even more when we're about to once again see the company's latest flagship offering.



1. Furkan

Posts: 552; Member since: Feb 25, 2017

always ugly ehm

12. audibot

Posts: 649; Member since: Jan 26, 2017

he also forgot to mention how they have stolen every intellectual property right, making them the biggest copier of tech

21. LiveFaith

Posts: 487; Member since: Jul 04, 2015

And, does this really matter when the company that you own a phone from does EXACTLY the same thing?

2. w1000i

Posts: 250; Member since: Jul 22, 2015

I like them a lot, they have better industrial quality compare to samsung equally to HTC and Apple.

3. VasiliS7

Posts: 202; Member since: Jan 10, 2017

I have the original Galaxy SPlus (i9001) and it works just fine even today, also I have the SII (i9100)& Galaxy S3 and works perfect both of them, with S3 having the stock battery. I had the S7edge and I sold it in perfect condition. I never had chineese phone like the Hawai and I don't have an opinion but I have Samsung and never experienced such a perfect quality.

14. w1000i

Posts: 250; Member since: Jul 22, 2015

Samsung phone they don't hold their beauty and don't feel robust in hand like Huaweis

4. kkmkk

Posts: 699; Member since: May 06, 2013

samsung had the best industrial design since 2015 so f**k off with your Chinese iPhone knock-off huwwaiuwiweiw

5. TechSceptic

Posts: 1156; Member since: Feb 05, 2018

You're kidding right? Samsung probably has the best build qualtiy out of all smartphone manufacturers. They're the only ones i can think of that has an IP-68 rating while still having an SD-card slot, stereo speakers and headphone jack, which makes it more difficult to waterproof a phone. as it's represents more points of weakness. Hell, they even managed to add a stylus into a phone on top of that, and it still has an IP 68 rating. Smartphones from HTC, Google and Apple don't have a headphone jack or SD-card slot, and yet the best they can do is IP 67. Lastly, Samsung is the smartphone brand that has done the best out of all brands in the durability tests from JerryRigEverything, even Apple has had a slip-up with the Iphone 6 the whole bendgate affair. It's just ignorant to say that Samsung has worse build quality than HTC, Huawei and Apple, beause that just isn't beinf truthful.

6. kiko007

Posts: 7518; Member since: Feb 17, 2016

"It's just ignorant to say that Samsung has worse build quality than HTC, Huawei and Apple, beause that just isn't beinf truthful." Careful now, Techie. Those typos are a dead giveaway of whom you happen to be. "Samsung is the smartphone brand that has done the best out of all brands in the durability tests from JerryRigEverything, even Apple has had a slip-up with the Iphone 6 the whole bendgate affair." First off, this is false. The S9 and S9+ both received a 4 out of 10 from JerryRigsEverything, while the iPhone X received a 6. Next... did you REALLY just bring up Bendgate when the more recent (and more dire) issue was Samsung's own Note 8 fiasco? Are you for real? They were burning people's homes, cars, and even kept planes from take off. How the hell is a few phones bending worse than that? Lastly, stop conflating design with build quality. Samsung makes pretty phones but in no way are they the "best built flagships" on the market. That isn't even a quantifiable statement, just Samsung fanboy nonsense.

7. PhoneCritic

Posts: 1354; Member since: Oct 05, 2011

Note 8 had no such issues. I think you are mistaken on that. Note 7 had the battery issue but not the Note 8.

8. kiko007

Posts: 7518; Member since: Feb 17, 2016

Note 7... then.

9. TechSceptic

Posts: 1156; Member since: Feb 05, 2018

Get lost you little child. I'm so tired of your insults and acting as if i'm someone im not. I told you many times, and i'm going to say it again. Get lost. I'm not interested in your replies, you can't function in a debate. You're a waste of time and energy, so i'm not going to even bother with replying properly to you, as that has never resulted in anything useful, as you never reply properly to me. Why don't you go and perform some more fellatio on Apple. I'm sure thats what you were doing before you replied to me, so why don't you just get back to that? You clearly love doing it.

10. kiko007

Posts: 7518; Member since: Feb 17, 2016

And I'm the one who can't function in an argument... huh? Seems to me you're the triggered one here.

11. PhoneCritic

Posts: 1354; Member since: Oct 05, 2011

Are you sure this is Techie XP( As we should not assume anything)? I say his writing style and articulation are vastly dissimilar. I would probably not accuse him of being someone we are not sure of unless there is irrefutable proof.

20. TechSceptic

Posts: 1156; Member since: Feb 05, 2018

Thank you. I wish there were more people like you on this site, instead of people basing their "facts" solely on their own opinion.

19. TechSceptic

Posts: 1156; Member since: Feb 05, 2018

Ofc i'm triggered, i'm tired of you insulting me and accusing me of being someone i'm not. It's the only thing your replies ever consist of. Try treating people with common decency for once you pathetic fanboy. I'm allowed to argue that Apple isn't the greatest thing that has happened to the human race and that Samsung isn't the worst this that has ever happened to the human race, without being insulted by you. Once you're actually able to respond in a fashion that opens up to debate instead of ridicule, then you're going to receive a proper response, but until that happens you're not going to get a proper response. It's your choice.

18. mootu

Posts: 1530; Member since: Mar 16, 2017

Actually the phones doing best on JerryRigEverything are Nokia. They are just built like tanks.

13. Sleeplessmedal

Posts: 31; Member since: Feb 02, 2018

They grew mainly due to the downfall and the absence of nokia. I mean who knew them before that?

15. maku2017

Posts: 11; Member since: Jan 19, 2017

dont forget the SONY phones if we talk about the build quality , good camera and also how good the company is.

16. worldpeace

Posts: 3135; Member since: Apr 15, 2016

Sony will be gone soon, it's useless to talk about them.

17. mootu

Posts: 1530; Member since: Mar 16, 2017

Sony Mobile actually makes a profit, they are going nowhere. If any large mobile company will disappear it will be LG Mobile who are shedding aroung $1 billion a year. HTC are also in the running for becoming non existant.

22. LiveFaith

Posts: 487; Member since: Jul 04, 2015

Guys, I know the fanboy flames are burning strong here. But any phone that is made of breakable/scratchable glass or dentable/scuffable/scratchable aluminum is N-O-T a well built mobile device. It's like putting 24K gold tires on a Mercedes and then crowing about how premium and superior they are to those cheesy common black rubber tires. Looks great in pictures. Makes for great fanboi circle jerk competitions. But when you have to go out immediately and buy a screen protector, a wrap, or a case to protect your $1,000 device from NORMAL usage ... then it aint a premium, industrial design. It's part jewelry.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.