Government threatens to force Apple to turn over iOS source code if it won't unlock Farook's iPhone
posted by Alan F. / Mar 12, 2016, 10:07 AM
The government is convinced that there could be useful information inside the phone, including the name of a possible third shooter than some witnesses claimed to have seen. For its part, Apple says that building the special version of iOS that would satisfy the government's request would be like playing with fire. If the code were to get into the wrong hands, every iPhone user in the world would have the information they store in their handset vulnerable to being stolen. This battle could go on until the case finally reaches the Supreme Court. Whoever loses at the District Court level is bound to appeal.
As we told you the other day, Apple believes that the DOJ is getting desperate, which explains why the government's rhetoric bar has been raised. But Apple is also in attack mode as in-house attorney Bruce Sewell called the government's filing a smear job.
By demanding the iOS source code and electronic signature, the government is trying to be cute. They are presenting this as an option that Apple can choose from if it doesn't want to build the new OS to provide the back door that the government seeks.
Both Apple and the government will present their cases in front of a judge on March 22nd.
Thanks for the tip!
This story is part of:Apple vs FBI: the San Bernardino case (19 updates)
14 March Why does Apple need encryption? John Oliver explains In the past few weeks, an unlikely topic has become the number one discussion in the media: encryption...
13 March Florida sheriff says he would put Tim Cook in jail if Apple were to refuse to open an iPhone for him Apple CEO Tim Cook best not be traveling anywhere near Polk County, Florida. Located in the center of the Sunshine State, the county is home to vacation spots like Lego Land. It also is the home of Sheriff Grady Judd. The sheriff told the media during a press conference last week that if his office needs an iPhone unlocked and Apple refuses, he would not hesitate to jail Apple's chief executive...
12 March Obama: We need to stop fetishizing our phones When President Barack Obama first took office in January 2009, the smartphone revolution was just getting underway. Obama, like many CEOs his age, had already been bitten by the BlackBerry bug by the time he took the oath of office and was sworn in as president. Early in his first term, we had already addressed his BlackBerry addiction...
Now reading12 March Government threatens to force Apple to turn over iOS source code if it won't unlock Farook's iPhone When the DOJ filled its response on Thursday to Apple's latest brief, it took a harsher tone than it had previously. The government threatened to take the entire source code to iOS and the "private electronic signature" that is required for access to the code. With those two items, the government will be able to build its own Govt.OS and unlock the Apple iPhone 5c that was used by deceased terrorist Syed Farook...
10 March Justice Department files "hostile" response to Apple's last brief Hoping that the third time will be the charm, the U.S. Department of Justice today filed its third brief with the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, trying to get Apple to comply with a Court Order. The latest filing responds to some of the reasons Apple has given for not following with the Order to unlock the Apple iPhone 5c used by deceased terrorist Syed Farook...
Posts: 3487; Member since: Oct 26, 2012
'The government is convinced that there could be useful information inside the phone, including the name of a possible third shooter than some witnesses claimed to have seen.' Does government actually think, the 3rd shooter is still in the country taking his chances and hoping for Apple to win ?
posted on Mar 12, 2016, 1:59 AM 25
Posts: 22; Member since: Apr 21, 2015
that doesn't matter, more names means more connections means more information, it's still a good chance that they find something that's why they won't give up. They aren't neccesarily trying to catch that guy, but his name might lead to more connections.
posted on Mar 12, 2016, 6:46 AM 6
Posts: 25; Member since: Feb 20, 2016
I don't like Apple but it's really admirable to see them take a stand for people. They might have their business interest in mind but still it's a nice thing.
posted on Mar 12, 2016, 2:14 AM 27
Posts: 1048; Member since: Dec 10, 2010
You know, so easy to sit there and say those things and pretend to be admirable of Apple, but guaranteed, you'd be singing a whole different tune if it was your family that got wiped out by these terrorists! Or if it was Cook's family that got annilated, he'd have a different tune as well.
posted on Mar 12, 2016, 11:38 AM 5
Posts: 1518; Member since: Feb 14, 2015
Guys this is a better news. Samsung has released the source code for Exynos 8890 http://www.sammobile.com/2016/
posted on Mar 12, 2016, 2:18 AM 13
Posts: 1; Member since: Mar 12, 2016
I think what really needs discussed here, does a company have the right to negate the government's ability to lawful search and seizure. Up til now it's it's mainly been a software issue with the government IT team finding a work around or brute force attack, but Apple has gone a step further with it's software/hardware combination and it's bricking capabilities. Literately erasing potential evidence. I understand the whole issue with privacy and government overreach and it leaves me conflicted to justify what the government is doing. On the other hand, I would not want to see a world were the governments ability to carry out it's duties is dictated by a corporation. I don't see any good coming out of this either way.
posted on Mar 12, 2016, 2:41 AM 1
Posts: 903; Member since: Feb 01, 2013
If the wrong password is entered in to an iPhone too many times, it does not brick the phone. It wipes the phones internal storage. Point being on this issue is had the FBI not had the SB Health department reset the iCloud password then this would not have been an issue and Apple would have been able to comply with turning over the "information" that the government is soo desperately seeking. I think this whole thing smells fishy, like the FBI kind of knew what they were doing in order to provoke Apple into building or turning over any information about a possible backdoor into iOS they might have and that does not sit well with me. That shouldn't sit well with anyone....
posted on Mar 12, 2016, 8:03 AM 7
Posts: 1; Member since: Mar 12, 2016
Apple to FBI: OK we'll trade our labor to open the source code for this one phone in exchange for, (1) drop all charges on Edward Snowden and let him come home, (2) release the truth about 911 and the demolition of WTC (3) you agree to pay $50 million per infringement of any future phone hacks to be paid from the FBI retirement fund.
posted on Mar 12, 2016, 3:10 AM 10
Posts: 1807; Member since: Oct 20, 2010
The FBI is going to get their private parts handed to them on a sliver platter. They've made themselves look like a baby crying for a candy bar the baby next to them has. It's beyond obvious they couldn't care less about the data on the 5C and just want a back door into iOS. Android probably has a back door and now they want one from Apple to complete their control over people's personal data.
posted on Mar 12, 2016, 4:06 AM 10
Posts: 2; Member since: Mar 12, 2016
Our government can not be trusted to use tools, such as what they are wanting from Apple, in the best interest of our nation, in part because they do not properly vet employees. Just a few months ago, December of 2015, a meth lab was discovered INSIDE the offices of the NIST in Maryland. During February of 2016, the FBI and the DHS each had their servers hacked, and data from tens of thousands of employees was stolen. They each claim it was facilitated by "malicious employees". It is not the first time government agencies have been hacked and had data stolen. In some other cases, government agencies have had hardware stolen, too. The FBI can not possibly claim with any credibility that anything Apple gives them will be safe from the hands of hackers, cybercriminals and/or our enemies.
posted on Mar 12, 2016, 6:42 AM 7
Posts: 85; Member since: Jan 07, 2015
I'm quite scared. We all know the government has the means to "convince" the judge to rule in their favor, because they're corrupt as s**t. They couldn't give a crap about the phone in question, what they want is a free pass to steal information from ONE BILLION DEVICES WORLDWIDE. Spying will have never been so easy. I say that if Apple is forced to do such a thing, they should shut iOS down worldwide. I know they couldn't handle the implications (no one could), but it would be the fair thing to do.
posted on Mar 12, 2016, 6:59 AM 5
Posts: 2531; Member since: Oct 31, 2011
What an absolute pile of filth. It's depressing to see a government go into the business of fear mongering in order to gain tools to erode privacy.
posted on Mar 12, 2016, 7:37 AM 9
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):