AnTuTu has ranked the top 10 best performing phones for Q3, 2014 - Meizu's MX4 takes the lead
posted by Paul.K / Nov 12, 2014, 9:42 AM
Now, we've seen the MTK6595-powered handset hit a top-score on AnTuTu twice before (1, 2), but that was well before the latest round of flagships – such as the Galaxy Note 4 and Xperia Z3 – hit the market. Back then, we were uncertain, whether the MX4 would be able to hold its crown, once the new handsets arrive, but it seems that it was able to do so – granted, it's only 170 points ahead of the Note 4, it still is ahead.
The statistic was compiled with results submitted from 160 different countries, while with models that have different CPUs for different regions, AnTuTu only took under account the model with the better-performing processor, and discarded the other one. At the end, the MX4 came out on top, with an average of 48,792 points, followed closely by the Galaxy Note 4 with 48,622, and the Galaxy Alpha with 48,385.
The top 10 is still predominated by Qualcomm Snapdragon-equipped smartphones, but it's interesting to see that the first 3 spots of the list have three different SoCs – the MediaTek MTK6595 in the MX4, Samsung's home-brewed Exynos Octa 7 in the Note 4 (which means that the Exynos Octa 7 performed better than the Snapdragon 805), and the Snapdragon 801 in the Galaxy Alpha . This goes to show that Qualcomm is no longer the player to beat in the CPU solutions market, and it would be interesting to see if it manages to reclaim its throne with the upcoming octa-core, 64-bit Snapdragon 810.
So, the Meizu MX4 was released this September and is already gaining popularity. It offers a 5.4" screen with the rather unorthodox 1152 x 1920 resolution (418 PPI) and provides a great handling experience, with an impressive 75.52% screen-to-body ratio, resulting in slim, easy to grasp, bezels. Aside from the aforementioned MTK6595, it has 2 GB of RAM, a choice between 16 and 32 GB of storage, a 20.7 MP Sony CMOS IMX 220 main camera sensor, a 2 MP front snapper, and a 3,100 mAh battery, which proved to be quite adequate in our battery life test. Meizu offers the handset at a $449 price point for customers outside of China, shipping and taxes (in certain markets) included, which is a pretty alluring offer.
Have you managed to get your hands on a Meizu MX4? If not – do you crave one?
source: AnTuTu via Android Community
Posts: 240; Member since: Oct 11, 2014
Where is the Iphone 6? I saw dozens of youtube videos of it scoring 50,000+.
posted on Nov 12, 2014, 9:54 AM 3
Posts: 324; Member since: Oct 11, 2013
My 6+ just scored a 51,104
posted on Nov 12, 2014, 10:02 AM 4
Posts: 140; Member since: May 19, 2014
that's because antutu render the benchmark for iphone 6 and 6+ with the very old resolution of 1136x960. that's why it gives a score so hight. you can chek on youtube at any antutu bench for IP 6 or 6+ he shows a resolution of 1136x960 during the graphic benchmark while for androide devices they shows there native resolution! sorry for my english
posted on Nov 12, 2014, 12:17 PM 3
And some educated people actually call the iPhone midrange yet performs better in benchmarks than some of the super Android phones do.
posted on Nov 12, 2014, 10:34 AM 9
Posts: 1774; Member since: Jul 30, 2013
They aren't educated. They are trolls, payed by other companies or miserable keyboard warriors. The moment I see someone telling me that he has an 8 core cpu on his android and how it will destroy the 2 cores on iphone 6 I just go quiet cause discussing with that kind of people is pointless. My dual core Moto X performs better than the quad core S5 simply cause of optimization and vanilla android.
posted on Nov 12, 2014, 11:00 AM 10
Posts: 48; Member since: Nov 10, 2014
Allowing any and all apps to run in background, consume CPU cycles and memory resources with no restriction is a very poor choice for a consumer product. It leads to poor performance, choppy screen updates, unpredictable memory shortages and bad battery life. That's why iOS, halfbaked, fake multitasking is fluid. Because , its "halfbaked" app launching device.
posted on Nov 12, 2014, 12:08 PM 1
Posts: 229; Member since: Mar 18, 2014
There's more to a phone's specs than just some benchmark scores. While the 6+ is certainly a high end phone (though I'd prefer a better camera in there, that sensor is just too small), the 6 is decidedly midrange with that screen resolution and lack of OIS compared to it's bigger brother.
posted on Nov 12, 2014, 1:11 PM 0
Posts: 5465; Member since: Apr 05, 2013
Most youtube videos I seen, they were around these numbers as well. Not above 50 but still under it. Which is still very very good.
posted on Nov 12, 2014, 10:50 AM 0
Posts: 3487; Member since: Oct 26, 2012
'This goes to show that Qualcomm is no longer the player to beat in the CPU solutions market'- Also, in addition to what Paul said, the only reason why a SD801 came in top 3 was because of a 720p display of Galaxy Alpha. Otherwise, Qualcomm would be miles off. Qualcomm has really dropped ball in this year's competition as nothing too outstanding came from them. And we all know the Exynos 7 is 32bit enabled inspite of being a 64bit architecture just so that it doesn't become too powerful then SD805 used in the US version of Note 4.
posted on Nov 12, 2014, 10:00 AM 4
Posts: 55; Member since: Oct 23, 2014
Just to add to the argument, but the Exynos and MediaTek chips are also eight cores, compared to Qualcomm's four. But honestly, these numbers just tell me that Qualcomm is late to the party on 64-bit and it's showing, but I highly doubt they're "no longer the player to beat".
posted on Nov 12, 2014, 10:15 AM 1
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):