x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Hidden picShow menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Samsung might be prepping a 5.8" ClorOLED display with 16 subpixels RGB matrix, can we say Note III?

Samsung might be prepping a 5.8" ClorOLED display with 16 subpixels RGB matrix, can we say Note III?

Posted: , by Daniel P.

Tags :

Samsung might be prepping a 5.8
We've been sent some info claimed to be from meetings with Samsung on its AMOLED display developments. The source says they've been told that Samsung is working on a project for a so-called ClorOLED display to be ready for mass yields in June 2013.

The specs are nothing short of stunning, if this whole tip is true, since the pixel density has allegedly been disclosed by Samsung to be 358ppi in a 5.8" unit, made with an RGB matrix, instead of the PenTile arrangement Samsung's been using for its HD Super AMOLED screens until the Note II

The claimed resolution, however, doesn't really add up to that pixel density. The source says the display is to sport the rather unconventional 1024x980 pixels, which, coupled with the reported 5.8" size, adds up to 244ppi. Here comes the kicker, though - out tipster claims that the RGB matrix of this project, codenamed ClorOLED, will be done with no less than 16 subpixels, so make of it what you will. The Super AMOLED Plus in the Galaxy S II is listed by Samsung as having 12 subpixels in ads, so we'd have a third more here.

With the Note II and its unconventional matrix arrangement Samsung showed that it is not afraid to experiment with the subpixels count, shape and position of its AMOLED displays, and produced its brightest and most discernible HD AMOLED screen so far, so an alternative arrangement is at least plausible. 

Furthermore, we heard recently that Samsung has managed to achieve 350ppi+ pixel densities with its current conventional AMOLED production technology, called Fine Metal Mask (FMM), so that might be the production process for the ClorOLED brand in the end.

This crazy amount of subpixels would mean much greater image clarity and definition, so we are all for ClorOLED, as utopian as it may sound. Mass June 2013 production sounds just about right for a Galaxy Note III release, so we will keep an eye for any rumors on that front.

Thanks for the tip!

63 Comments
  • Options
    Close





posted on 06 Sep 2012, 06:28 31

1. redmd (Posts: 1314; Member since: 26 Oct 2011)


+ Exynos 5 = winner.

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 07:24 2

25. SuperAndroidEvo (Posts: 4888; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)


I don't know about that? The Qualcomm quad-core Krait S4 Pro with Adreno 320 clocked at 1.5 to 1.6GHz will eat the dual-core Exynos 5 is it ever decides come out that is.

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 08:06 11

32. remixfa (Posts: 14597; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


lol. you want to bet on that? the Quad krait is nice, no doubt, but the krait is not as strong as the E5, and the Adreno 320 is not as strong as the Mali 6xx.

It might win on certain floating point muscle tests, but over all it will be at LEAST slightly weaker than the E5 if not noticeably weaker.

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 08:09 7

38. maryaaadil (Posts: 146; Member since: 07 Apr 2012)


I want this screen with quad e5 on note 3
A 4gb ram n maybe 16MP camera
N i will buy it.

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 08:23 4

40. jrandolf (Posts: 22; Member since: 29 Aug 2012)


lol . :P maybe your dream phone is 2 or 3 years away from now . :p

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 09:08

47. SuperAndroidEvo (Posts: 4888; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)


Yeah you are right but it will be this time next year before anything will have a quad-core E5. Also the dual-core E5 might be out some time in late Q1 or early Q2. So that is cool if you don't mind waiting.

I really would like to see Qualcomm's answer to the E5. You know since Qualcomm is already working on their next successor to the S4. lol

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 09:13

48. denied911 (banned) (Posts: 361; Member since: 31 May 2012)


1680x945x5.5"=350.46ppi=Gnote 3
any takers?

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 09:48 5

52. remixfa (Posts: 14597; Member since: 19 Dec 2008)


all companies work 2+ generations ahead. Thats not new. :)

The S4 pro/quad is their answer to the 4412. Their answer to the E5/E5 quad is a while away, just like the e5 quad.

I dont mind waiting. You know me, if its not exactly what I want, I'm not gonna buy it. Im a patient lil tech geek.

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 11:41 2

55. BiN4RY (Posts: 83; Member since: 22 Jun 2012)


Yeah and I also wants my phone to vacuum my room and make coffee for me.

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 16:22

56. p0rkguy (Posts: 685; Member since: 23 Nov 2010)


Actually, @ 5.8 1920x800 = 358.62ppi.
Aspect ratio of 2.40:1 which is common among movies.

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 17:55

57. denied911 (banned) (Posts: 361; Member since: 31 May 2012)


i don't think thay change aspect ratio
now 16:9 is perfect and 1680x945 is 16:9
besides samsung need something between 720p and 1080p because in 4.8-5" screens they can't make fullhd amoled yet, and lcd will be pretty soon

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 18:06 1

58. The_Godfather (Posts: 195; Member since: 26 Apr 2012)


Wait............Let me buy Note 2 first

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 06:28 66

2. groupsacc (Posts: 232; Member since: 28 Feb 2012)


Camera > Nokia
Display > Samsung
Design > Sony
Material > HTC
Hardware Specs > LG
OS > Google

Dream phone.

Sorry Apple. Couldn't find you a spot.

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 06:31 86

6. redmd (Posts: 1314; Member since: 26 Oct 2011)


Lawsuit > Apple

There, completed that for you.

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 06:32 19

7. megaSUNNY (Posts: 85; Member since: 26 Jun 2012)


nothing > iphone

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 06:32 2

9. jubbing (Posts: 150; Member since: 20 Aug 2008)


App > Simplicity

Also.. Hardware specs LG? WTFBBQ?

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 06:34 4

10. nnaatthhaannx2 (Posts: 820; Member since: 19 Oct 2011)


Motorola?

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 06:35 7

11. groupsacc (Posts: 232; Member since: 28 Feb 2012)


LG Optimus G had me turned recently

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 06:35 13

12. groupsacc (Posts: 232; Member since: 28 Feb 2012)


Battery... :)

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 06:44 2

14. Mittal (Posts: 494; Member since: 14 Dec 2011)


I dont agree with the Design part
Was better with Ericsson

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 06:49 2

19. fost4real (Posts: 27; Member since: 29 Dec 2011)


Good one there!

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 06:56 17

20. babyk (Posts: 323; Member since: 03 Nov 2011)


LOL LOL LOL

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 06:57 1

21. rizaldiwn (Posts: 3; Member since: 06 Sep 2012)


i think camera good camera is in Sony and Nokia (pure view version)
Display : i prefer htc. HTC sense is better GUI than touchwiz, although makes slower response about 0.xxxx second than touchwiz ( it's not important -.- )
Design : Sony is the best
Material : HTC is the best
Hardware specs : Samsung
OS : Android and windows phone looks even better and solid now, may be it will be hard competitor of android and iOS

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 07:25 5

26. fanboy1974 (Posts: 1345; Member since: 12 Nov 2011)


Sheep > Apple

The average Apple fanboy will pay money to have Tim Cook spit in their food. Only reason why Apple will sale millions of iPhones. People are getting wiser which is a good sign.

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 07:18 2

24. fanboy1974 (Posts: 1345; Member since: 12 Nov 2011)


Radio

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 07:44 14

27. XiphiasGladius (Posts: 813; Member since: 21 Aug 2011)


Bulls Eye! Cant stop LOL. . .

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 07:57 2

28. RamyRamz69 (Posts: 390; Member since: 12 Dec 2011)


Camera > Nokia my ass.

Sony makes the best cameras in a compact device. I would love to see how the Lumia 920 fairs against an Exmor RS 13 MP camera from Sony.

The Lumia 800's camera doesn't even come close to Sony's cameras in the Xperia Arc/iPhone4S/GalaxyS3

The Xperia S' camera is better than the N8:http://www.dialaphone.co.uk/blog/2012/02/13/12mp-camera-phone-comparison-sony-xperia-s-vs-nokia-n8/

Yes, Nokia does make very decent cameras. The best camera I've seen on a mobile phone was the 808 Pureview, but let's face it; it just ruins the design of the phone. If you want a camera that doesn't look hideous, Sony is the answer.

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 07:58 1

29. zhypher_23 (Posts: 195; Member since: 04 Jun 2012)


Haha Nice one Bro :D

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 07:59 10

30. good2great (Posts: 1042; Member since: 22 Feb 2012)


lmao!!! that was a good one @redmd

+100

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 08:07 2

33. maryaaadil (Posts: 146; Member since: 07 Apr 2012)


Xperia S,.......
N8 way relesed way back.
Wanna compare it then do it with lumia 920 or monster 808

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories