x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Hidden picShow menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Nokia Lumia 920 vs Samsung ATIV S vs Nokia Lumia 820 vs Lumia 900: spec comparison

Nokia Lumia 920 vs Samsung ATIV S vs Nokia Lumia 820 vs Lumia 900: spec comparison

Posted: , by Victor H.

Tags :

Nokia Lumia 920 vs Samsung ATIV S vs Nokia Lumia 820 vs Lumia 900: spec comparison
Last time, when Nokia launched its first Lumia smartphones, it claimed to be making the best Windows Phone devices. That was a jab to the competition but also partly true, as most phone makers are focusing first and foremost on Android. But Nokia's exclusive focus on Windows Phone doesn't necessarily grant it success and we saw that Samsung was the first to announce a Windows Phone 8 smartphone with the ATIV S unveiling last week.

And that was one impressive phone with a big screen, a processor that doesn't differ from what Nokia offers and with a classical design that's bound to withstand the test of time.

Nokia wasn't too surprised and it accepted the challenge. Today, it brought two new devices - the flagship Lumia 920 with PureView camera technology and the colorful and vivid mid-range Lumia 820. So we asked ourselves: who is the big winner in the Windows Phone 8 marketplace after all and how do the new devices compare to old ones? Here is a comparison chart exploring all the technical details, check it out and let us know who wins the spec war in your opinion.

Nokia Lumia 920 vs Samsung ATIV S vs Nokia Lumia 820 vs Lumia 900: spec comparison

 

63 Comments
  • Options
    Close






posted on 05 Sep 2012, 11:02 24

1. Berzerk000 (Posts: 4275; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)


Nokia makes the best WP devices. If I were to get one, it would definitely be the Nokia 920

posted on 05 Sep 2012, 11:06 13

4. mambocream (Posts: 29; Member since: 10 Jun 2011)


Agreed. But I do think that it is a mistake to not have microSD expand-ability.

posted on 05 Sep 2012, 11:21 13

21. tekkie79 (Posts: 11; Member since: 21 Dec 2009)


Besides movies, what would anyone actually do with 32GB+ on a phone? I don't know about anyone else, but I simply cannot stare at my phone for 2 hours watching a movie. Moreover, the battery never lasts that long even with a full charge so I've never really seen the value in having even 16GB on my phone. My tablet and PC yes, but not on my phone.

posted on 05 Sep 2012, 11:37 5

27. Berzerk000 (Posts: 4275; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)


Expandable memory is really only important on tablets, unless there's less than 16 GB of memory on board.

posted on 07 Sep 2012, 07:54

57. RomeoJDR (Posts: 244; Member since: 09 Dec 2011)


Agree, but music is a data space hog, so I would say 32GB is necessary for me to care less about the phone not offering expandable memory. Just take a look at how much storage your consuming on you phone now and you'll have an idea of the amount you need. Regardless, this phone offering 32GB will suffice for 99% of us.

posted on 05 Sep 2012, 11:45 2

31. rainyday (Posts: 44; Member since: 04 Sep 2012)


some people record videos also...if you do, you will see that 32GB is not that much

posted on 05 Sep 2012, 12:09 2

35. darac (Posts: 2156; Member since: 17 Oct 2011)


Please, what phone do you use?
You clearly have no idea how it is to watch on 4.5+ inch of hd goodness in your hands.

For example, my sister uses MacBook for watching movies yet she watched a few episodes of her favorite show on my phone and was thrilled with the experience..wanted to bring it with her so she can watch the entire series on it!

posted on 05 Sep 2012, 12:33

39. JASSI (Posts: 2; Member since: 05 Sep 2012)


Agree. Some people r really crazy bout hardware not bout software not design.

posted on 05 Sep 2012, 12:40 1

40. DarkWalkker (Posts: 5; Member since: 07 Dec 2011)


Personally I would like to have all of my music and pictures synced to my phone... IMO the phones have taken over the function that used to be Ipod / Zune, so they should have expandable memory so if I want, I can jack it up to 64 gig to store all of my content...

To me that is the only short coming here... but I like what I see... and if Sprint would get off their backside, I would buy one of these as soon as they come out!

posted on 05 Sep 2012, 13:41 1

42. timepilot84 (Posts: 113; Member since: 16 Aug 2012)


Music. My 64Gb iPhone 4S isn't quite large enough to store my entire music collection, so I have to pare it down. I'd like to be able to have everything.

If MS has decent integration with their cloud drive stuff, and good prices for online storage, this could be moot.

posted on 05 Sep 2012, 14:49 1

44. osanilevich (Posts: 285; Member since: 29 Sep 2009)


I don't know about you guys but I save all my pictures and videos to external SD. It would be a real pain to transfer all that data instead of simply poping in the SD card. Wonder why they gave the lumia 820 a slot but not the 920 which is supposed to be a flagship device

posted on 05 Sep 2012, 11:12

12. neutralguy (Posts: 1152; Member since: 30 Apr 2012)


*i commented here for the author to see it faster*

Lumia 820 and Lumia 900's thickness.

It's shown that it has 6.8mm thickness.

posted on 05 Sep 2012, 11:14 2

16. Wiki_jaan (Posts: 704; Member since: 24 Jun 2012)


L920 10.7mm and L820 9.9mm

posted on 05 Sep 2012, 11:15 7

18. neutralguy (Posts: 1152; Member since: 30 Apr 2012)


Lumia 920's thickness=10.7mm

Lumia 820's thickness=9.9mm

Lumia 900's thickness=11.5mm

posted on 05 Sep 2012, 11:40 1

28. neutralguy (Posts: 1152; Member since: 30 Apr 2012)


Okay, no one's listening. Meh.

posted on 05 Sep 2012, 11:26

23. apocalypsebc (Posts: 148; Member since: 07 Dec 2010)


I agree as well but I would like to know which display is better. Nokia 920 LCD or Samsung Amoled. I know Nokia uses amoled as well but the 920 is LCD.

posted on 05 Sep 2012, 11:36 1

26. neutralguy (Posts: 1152; Member since: 30 Apr 2012)


the difference is that amoled produces better "black" because it turns that particular pixel off. While LCD have backlights.

posted on 07 Sep 2012, 08:10

58. RomeoJDR (Posts: 244; Member since: 09 Dec 2011)


Each has their pluses and minuses. AMOLED offers for vivid colors, LCD will have more accurate colors. The display on the Lumnia 900 I checked out at the store was fantastic and I think I read an article a while back talking about some unique black technology it has. I can only assume the display on the 920 will be at least on par with all the other HD screens.

posted on 05 Sep 2012, 11:56 5

32. ab2412 (Posts: 8; Member since: 06 Aug 2012)


Are you blind?? Loot at Samsung ATIV S specs.. Samsung is best in only one Win 8 flagship.. FTW ATIV is best..

posted on 05 Sep 2012, 12:05 5

34. neutralguy (Posts: 1152; Member since: 30 Apr 2012)


so, are you blind too? have you seen the lumia 920's spec? Aren't they almost identical? The only thing ativ s' upside was having a bigger battery and microSD slot.

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 02:02

53. ab2412 (Posts: 8; Member since: 06 Aug 2012)


Ya bro.. LUMIA also is brick like heavy 180G.. OMG.. NOKIA phone says "If you don't like my phone, then use me as a BRICK". And PLUS point for ATIV S are SUPER AMOLED HD, Micro Sd, Light Weight, Bigger Battery and what else you want from a phone?? And time will tell which is better MUMIA or ATIV S..

posted on 05 Sep 2012, 12:13 2

38. mobilefuture (Posts: 218; Member since: 12 Nov 2011)


lets see how the ATIV S compares to the Lumia 920 in terms of Camera quality and outdoor visibility!

posted on 05 Sep 2012, 16:19

45. TDILL1021 (Posts: 1; Member since: 05 Sep 2012)


also the 920 has much more features than the ATIV S. I also think the 920 looks a million times better.

posted on 05 Sep 2012, 18:23

49. Berzerk000 (Posts: 4275; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)


They're pretty much identical, except the Ativ has a bigger SA display... Nothing else. Same processor, same RAM, same OS, etc...

posted on 05 Sep 2012, 18:17

47. denied911 (banned) (Posts: 361; Member since: 31 May 2012)


185 gramm of 920 is 5 more of 180 note 2 and note has 5,5" screen and 3100 battery
sorry dude but you are nokia fanboy

posted on 05 Sep 2012, 11:03 7

2. shadez10 (Posts: 427; Member since: 15 Jan 2012)


LUMIA 920!!!

posted on 05 Sep 2012, 11:06 5

3. SteveWozzENIAC (Posts: 16; Member since: 27 Aug 2012)


I can't wait to buy Lumia 920 !

posted on 05 Sep 2012, 18:17

48. denied911 (banned) (Posts: 361; Member since: 31 May 2012)


185 gramm of 920 is 5 more of 180 note 2 and note has 5,5" screen and 3100 battery
sorry dude but you are nokia fanboy

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 09:43

55. SteveWozzENIAC (Posts: 16; Member since: 27 Aug 2012)


i am not a fanboy , i am a technology lover...
I have a Galaxy Note ...
But NOkias design is outstanding...once again.

My QUOTE

Technology ROCKS
Haters SUCK (Big time)

posted on 06 Sep 2012, 10:50

56. denied911 (banned) (Posts: 361; Member since: 31 May 2012)


ok, relax
i have nokia 6230
and just sold n8, i liked nokia, but just saying that 185g is some kind of record for smartphone

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories