Moto X+1/Moto X Play passes through the FCC
1. irellemot (Posts: 109; Member since: 29 Nov 2012)
What? That can't be right or it must have no bezel.
I mean that would be a good bit smaller than the G3, and it would have a screen that's .4 inches bigger?
4. Bjray (Posts: 177; Member since: 29 May 2014)
I hope it's not. About time LG had some competition with slim bezels :)
11. irellemot (Posts: 109; Member since: 29 Nov 2012)
I did the math using this website (prinds(dot)com/tools/screenDimensions.htm)and discovered the dimensions are impossible.
A 5.87 inch display with zero bezel is a bit over 73mm wide, and 130mm tall.
So unless Google found out a way to warp space and time, this phone's screen is smaller than it appears to be.
12. Run.n.Gun (Posts: 45; Member since: 06 Nov 2013)
But it doesn't mention screen size though
14. Bjray (Posts: 177; Member since: 29 May 2014)
Actually, it's not impossible. They wouldn't necessarily need to warp space and time. But they could wrap the display around the sides like the Samsung's YOUM concept.
But of course I don't expect that to happen.
2. fzacek (Posts: 2486; Member since: 26 Jan 2014)
As the commenter before me mentioned, there is no way that this phone is smaller than the G3 and has a much bigger display. It just isn't possible...
5. 0xFFFF (Posts: 3806; Member since: 16 Apr 2014)
It actually has a 5.2" display. But let's not spoil the fun.
7. SeanPlunk (Posts: 16; Member since: 06 Sep 2013)
The dimensions can't possibly be right. The Note 3 is 151.2mm tall and the Galaxy S5 is 142mm tall. The G2 is 138.5mm tall though and has a 5.2" screen.
Either the screen size is wrong or the height is wrong.
8. Chuck007 (Posts: 1111; Member since: 02 Mar 2014)
I wonder why Google finally decided to use Moto to make their Nexus flagship. Right before Lenovo ownership at that.
9. Commentator (Posts: 3692; Member since: 16 Aug 2011)
So as not to make other manufacturers angry, I suppose. It's rumored that Samsung had a big role in the reason Google is selling Moto.