iPhone 17 vs Galaxy S25: Who wins the $799 flagship battle of 2025?

Double the storage for the same price? The iPhone 17 has a lot going for it, but so does the Galaxy S25.

4comments
We may earn a commission if you make a purchase from the links on this page.
Person holding iPhone and Galaxy phone side by side, both showing their lock screens.

The iPhone 17 is here, and it brings the long-awaited 120Hz ProMotion display to the base iPhone, a new 18 MP selfie and 48 MP ultrawide camera, and faster charging.

But many buyers might find themselves asking: how does it stack up against Samsung’s Galaxy S25, a phone that already impressed us earlier this year with its sleek design and the outstanding performance of the Snapdragon 8 Elite?

If you’re choosing between the Galaxy S25 and the iPhone 17 today, the big question is which one gives you the better value for your money, Is it Samsung’s compact flagship, or the best value iPhone in recent times?

To find out, we put both phones through our in-house tests for battery life, charging, camera quality, display performance, and raw speed. We also spent time with these devices to see how they perform in real life. In this detailed comparison, we’ll share our results and help you decide which one makes the smarter choice.

iPhone 17: $0.00/mo. at Verizon

$0 /mo
$23 05
$23 off (100%)
Get the iPhone 17 and enjoy improved design, better battery life, and top-tier performance. Right now, you can get the phone for $0.00/mo. with Unlimited Welcome, Unlimited Plus or Unlimited Ultimate plan.
Buy at Verizon

iPhone Air: $0.00/mo. at Verizon

$0 /mo
$27 77
$28 off (100%)
The slimmest iPhone is here! You can now buy the powerful iPhone Air at Verizon for $0.00/mo. with a new line activation on select Unlimited plans and a trade-in. This is an online-only offer.
Buy at Verizon

Samsung Galaxy S25

6.2-inch
Triple camera
4000 mAh
12GB
$449 at Amazon

iPhone 17 vs Galaxy S25 differences:


7.7
Apple iPhone 17
7.4
Samsung Galaxy S25
5.9
7.6
6.8
6.1
7.6
8.6
8.5
8
8.2
8
8
10
Battery Life
Photo Quality
Video Quality
Charging
Performance Heavy
Performance Light
Display Quality
Design
Wireless Charging
Biometrics
Audio
Software
7.1
7.2
6.6
6.1
7.8
8.4
8
7
6.3
8
7
8

Table of Contents:

Design and Size

The S25 is a true compact flagship


The Galaxy S25 is still the most compact mainstream flagship phone you can buy right now. It weighs just 162g and measures a sleek 7.25mm in thickness, making it one of the slimmest flagship phones in years. Samsung uses an aluminum frame combined with Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on both the front and the back for durability.

Apple’s iPhone 17, on the other hand, is taller, thicker, and heavier than its predecessor, and even more so when compared to the S25. Apple uses an aluminum frame with a Ceramic Shield 2 front (which it claims is three times more scratch-resistant than the previous generation) and a reinforced glass back. Unlike the Pro models, though, the back does not get Ceramic Shield 2.



The iPhone 17 sticks to the vertical pill-shaped camera bump with two lenses and a mostly unchanged rear design from the iPhone 16. The S25 keeps Samsung’s signature vertically stacked triple-camera layout. Both should share IP68 water and dust resistance.



When it comes to hues, the iPhone 17 colors are:
  • Black
  • Lavender
  • Mist Blue
  • Sage
  • White


There is a lot more to choose from when it comes to the Galaxy S25 colors:
  • Icy Blue
  • Mint
  • Navy
  • Silver Shadow
  • Pink Gold
  • Coral Red
  • Blue Black


The iPhone 17 brings one of the most important upgrades in years for Apple’s base models: a 1-120Hz ProMotion OLED display. It’s also larger than before at 6.3 inches and now peaks at 3000 nits outdoors, making it the brightest iPhone display to date, while HDR content reaches 1600 nits.

The Galaxy S25 has a slightly smaller 6.2-inch AMOLED panel, which also comes with a 1-120Hz refresh rate. It's slightly less bright, peaking at 2600 nits, but should still be plenty bright to offer excellent for visibility under direct sunlight.

Apple has refined the iPhone 17 series display with a seven-layer anti-reflective coating.

While it is still behind the Galaxy S25 Ultra in this regard, footage from YouTuber MrWhoseTheBoss shows it cutting glare noticeably more than the iPhone 16 series.


Both phones offer symmetrical bezels, though Apple trimmed them further with the iPhone 17. For biometrics, Apple sticks with Face ID in the Dynamic Island, while Samsung uses an ultrasonic fingerprint reader under the display, supplemented by basic Face Unlock.

Display Measurements:



The iPhone 17 has the brighter screen (2672 nits vs 2394). Our tests confirmed Apple’s anti-reflective coating helps too — outdoors, it simply beats the Galaxy. The S25 has an extremely low minimum brightness, though, so if you use your phone in dark environments and want it to go as dim as possible, it is a much better phone for that.

Recommended Stories

Performance and Software

Snapdragon 8 Elite vs A19


Apple’s iPhone 17 runs on the A19 Bionic, built on TSMC’s refined 3nm (N3P) process. The company claims this new chip is more efficient and better optimized for sustained workloads compared to the A18. It is paired with 8 GB of RAM and a base storage of 256 GB, which is double the iPhone 16, all without any price increase.

Samsung powers the Galaxy S25 with Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Elite, which is also built on a 3nm node. It comes with 12 GB of RAM and up to 512 GB of UFS 4.0 storage, giving it an advantage in memory and storage speed. The increased memory is especially helpful for tackling on-device AI features, which is an area where the iPhone is still lagging behind.


On the software side:
  • iPhone 17 launches with iOS 26, introducing the new Liquid Glass interface, Call Screening, Live Translate, smarter Messages, and Apple Intelligence. However, many advanced AI features, including Siri 2.0, won’t roll out until 2026 or later.
  • Galaxy S25 ships with One UI 7 on Android 16, with Galaxy AI fully integrated. This includes Circle to Search, real-time Live Translate, Note Assist, and generative photo editing.

Samsung promises 7 years of software updates, and while Apple doesn't make any promises when it comes to software support, iPhones are typically supported for at least 5 years, often more than that.

CPU Performance Benchmarks:


Geekbench 6
SingleHigher is better
Apple iPhone 173527
Samsung Galaxy S253031
Geekbench 6
MultiHigher is better
Apple iPhone 178798
Samsung Galaxy S259626


Our Geekbench 6 tests show the iPhone 17 leading in single-core (3527 vs 3031). That's quite typical for Apple's chips, but in multi-core, the Galaxy S25 pulls significantly ahead (9626 vs 8798), which means it has more raw throughput for multitasking and heavier workloads. That said, for daily use, both feel very fast.

GPU Performance:


3DMark Extreme(High)Higher is better
Apple iPhone 175172
Samsung Galaxy S255959
3DMark Extreme(Low)Higher is better
Apple iPhone 173295
Samsung Galaxy S252500

In 3DMark Extreme, the S25 reached a higher high score (5959 vs 5172), meaning peak GPU power is stronger. But the iPhone 17 proved more stable under load, with a better low score (3295 vs 2500). In other words, Galaxy gives you higher performance in ideal conditions, but the iPhone stays cooler and more consistent over long sessions.

Camera

Apple still won't offer a dedicated telephoto camera


Apple has given the iPhone 17 camera system a good boost. While it keeps the 48 MP main camera from last year, the ultrawide has been upgraded to 48 MP (up from 12 MP), delivering sharper detail and improved macro photography.

On the front, we have a brand new 18 MP camera with Center Stage, which uses a larger square sensor that captures both portrait and landscape selfies without rotating the phone, automatically widening the frame for group shots. It also supports stabilized (with optical image stabilization) 4K HDR video and Dual Capture for recording with both front and back cameras.

The Galaxy S25 has a more versatile triple-camera system, adding the benefits of a dedicated telephoto camera. Its main snapper has a 50 MP sensor, complemented by a 12 MP ultrawide and a 10 MP telephoto with 3x optical zoom. This gives the S25 more flexibility in zoom shots, which is something the iPhone 17 still cannot offer.

PhoneArena Camera Score:


Photo
Video
Phone Camera
Score
Photo
Score
Main
(wide)
Ultra
Wide
Selfie Zoom
Apple iPhone 17 150 156 84 24 28 21
Samsung Galaxy S25 147 151 80 21 27 23
Phone Camera
Score
Video
Score
Main
(wide)
Ultra
Wide
Selfie Zoom
Apple iPhone 17 150 145 77 23 26 18
Samsung Galaxy S25 147 142 74 21 26 21
Find out more details about photo and video scores for all phones we have tested on our PhoneArena Camera Score page

Our camera benchmarks show the iPhone 17 scoring slightly higher overall (150 vs 147). The iPhone 17 pulls ahead mainly thanks to its main and ultrawide cameras, but it loses some points because it lacks a dedicated telephoto, unlike the Galaxy S25. If you care about portraits and zoom flexibility, Galaxy wins; for ultrawide and video, the iPhone is stronger.

Main Camera




The iPhone prefers to expose for the shadows, revealing more of the dark areas in the image, whereas the S25 exposes for the highlights and preserves more detail in the brighter areas. The iPhone 17 also consistently goes for a warmer white balance, making the whole image more yellow/orange.

Zoom Quality




Both phones digitally zoom when it comes to 2x mode, but the iPhone uses sensor crop in this situation, resulting in a better image.



At 5x, the iPhone 17's sharpness drops massively, while the Galaxy S25 uses its 3x telephoto camera, resulting in more detail. That said, I prefer how the iPhone has processed the image.

Ultra-wide Camera




The image from the iPhoen 17's ultrawide camera has a lot more contrast and, again, a bit on the warmer side. The S25 ultrawide might not be a sharp compared to the 48 MP one on the iPhone 17, but the colors look more natural and you see more in the shadows.

Selfies




I much prefer the way the S25 has handled the skin tones here (you can also see the eyes much better thanks to lifted shadows). The iPhone, on the other hand, has made the subject look orange, and it doesn't show the eyes as well.

More Camera Samples




Video Quality


Video Thumbnail


Battery Life and Charging

For the first time the iPhone has better charging than its Galaxy counterpart


The Galaxy S25 has the bigger battery capacity, coming in at 4,000 mAh. The iPhone 17 packs a somewhat smaller 3,692 mAh battery.

Where Apple fights back is charging. The iPhone 17’s 40W wired charging vs 25W charging on the Galaxy S25. There's also the 25W MagSafe wireless charging, and unlike the Pixel 10 and its PixelSnap system, the Galaxy S25 does not have magnetic charging capabilities.

PhoneArena Battery and Charging Test Results:


Battery Life
Charging
Phone Battery Life
estimate
Browsing Video Gaming
Apple iPhone 17
3692 mAh
6h 13min 16h 47min 7h 19min 9h 12min
Samsung Galaxy S25
4000 mAh
7h 6min 18h 29min 8h 1min 12h 20min
Phone Full Charging 30 min Charge
Wired Wireless Wired Wireless
Apple iPhone 17
3692 mAh
1h 16min Untested 67% Untested
Samsung Galaxy S25
4000 mAh
1h 22min 1h 37min 54% 32%
Find out more details about battery and charging for all phones we have tested on our PhoneArena Battery Score page

In our testing, the Galaxy S25 vastly outlasted the iPhone 17. It managed 7h 6min overall vs 6h 13min on the iPhone 17. Samsung led in browsing (18h vs 16h) and especially gaming (12h vs 9h). The iPhone 17 isn’t bad, but it’s clear Samsung has the more efficient chip, apart from it's somewhat larger battery.

Apple takes the win when it comes to charging, though. The iPhone 17 charges faster (67% in 30 minutes) with a full charge in 1h16m vs the Galaxy’s 1h22m. 

Audio Quality and Haptics


Both phones scored similarly in our audio tests, though the iPhone came in slightly ahead in clarity, while also offering a more balanced audio profile.

Biometrics are still quite different. Apple relies on its famous Face ID, while Samsung offers a fast ultrasonic fingerprint reader with optional face unlock, the latter of which cannot be used for contactless payments.

Specs Comparison


Here's a quick overview of the iPhone 17 vs Galaxy S25 specs:


Also read: iPhone Air vs iPhone 17: Is Apple’s thinnest phone worth $200 More?

Summary



The iPhone 17 is the most complete base iPhone we’ve seen in years. It delivers a ProMotion display, great brightness, a sharper ultrawide, all while finally beating Samsung in charging speeds and storage value.

The Galaxy S25, however, holds onto its crown as the compact flagship of 2025. It’s lighter, thinner, and it has a more reliabel battery life. Its telephoto camera still makes it more versatile (albeit no longer unique because of the Pixel 10), and Samsung’s Galaxy AI suite is simply more advanced than Apple Intelligence still.

Which one should you get? Get the iPhone 17 if you want display excellence, faster charging, better video quality, and more base storage. Get the Galaxy S25 if you want a compact, lightweight phone with better battery life, telephoto zoom, and deeper AI features.

At $799, both are excellent choices, though, so you can't really go wrong with either of them.

Google News Follow
Follow us on Google News
COMMENTS (4)

Recommended Stories

FCC OKs Cingular\'s purchase of AT&T Wireless