- Home
- Xiaomi Phones
- You are here
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Full Specifications
8.0
I want it
0 users
I have it
0 users
I had it
0 users
Popular Comparisons
The Xiaomi Poco X4 GT is most commonly compared with these phones:
Design |
|
---|---|
Dimensions |
6.44 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches 163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9 mm |
Weight | 7.05 oz (200.0 g) |
Materials | Frame: Plastic |
Biometrics | 2D Face unlock, Fingerprint (touch) |
Keys | Right: Volume control, Lock/Unlock key |
Colors | Blue. Black, Silver |
Display |
|
---|---|
Size | 6.6-inch |
Resolution | 2460x1080px, 20.5:9 ratio, 407 PPI |
Technology | IPS LCD |
Refresh rate | 144Hz |
Screen-to-body | 84.97 % |
Features | Scratch-resistant glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5), Ambient light sensor, Proximity sensor |
Hardware |
|
---|---|
System chip | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 SM8250- (5 nm) |
Processor |
Octa-core 4x 2.85GHz Cortex-A78 + 4x 2.0GHz Cortex-A55 |
GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 |
RAM | 8GB |
Internal storage | 128GB (UFS 3.1) |
Storage expansion | not expandable |
OS | Android (12), Xiaomi MI UI |
This device has different variants: View all |
Battery |
|
---|---|
Capacity | 5080 mAh |
Charging | Qualcomm Quick Charge, USB Power Delivery |
Charge speed | Wired: 67.0W |
Camera |
|
---|---|
Rear | Triple camera |
Main camera |
64 MP (PDAF) Aperture size: F1.9 Pixel size: 0.8 μm |
Second camera |
8 MP (Ultra-wide) Aperture size: F2.2 Sensor size: 1/4" Pixel size: 1.12 μm |
Third camera |
2 MP (Macro, Autofocus) Aperture size: F2.4 |
Flash | LED |
Video recording |
3840x2160 (4K UHD), 1920x1080 (Full HD), 1280x720 (HD) Time-lapse video, EIS |
Front | 16 MP (HDR, Slow-motion videos), Video capture: 1920x1080 (Full HD) |
Connectivity & Features |
|
---|---|
Bluetooth | 5.3 |
WLAN |
802.11 a,b,g,n,ac,ax(Wi-Fi 6),dual-band Wi-Fi Direct, Hotspot |
USB | Type-C, USB 2.0 |
Location | GPS, A-GPS, Glonass, BeiDou, Dual-band positioning, Cell ID, Wi-Fi positioning |
Sensors | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Compass |
Other | NFC |
Multimedia |
|
---|---|
Headphones | 3.5mm jack |
Speakers | Earpiece, Multiple speakers |
Features | Dolby Atmos |
Screen mirroring | Wireless screen share |
Additional microphone(s) | Noise cancellation, Video recording |
Cellular |
|
---|---|
5G | Bands n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n28, n38, n40, n41, n77, n78, SA, NSA |
4G (FDD) | Bands 1(2100), 2(1900), 3(1800), 4(AWS-1), 5(850), 7(2600), 8(900), 12(700 a), 17(700 b), 18(800 Lower), 19(800 Upper), 20(800 DD), 26(850+), 28(700 APT) |
4G (TDD) | Bands 38(2600), 40(2300), 41(2600+) |
3G | Bands 1(2100), 2(1900), 4(1700/2100), 5(850), 8(900) |
Data Speed | LTE-A, HSDPA+ (4G) 42.2 Mbit/s, HSUPA 5.76 Mbit/s |
SIM type | Dual Nano SIM |
Availability |
|
---|---|
Officially announced | Jun 23, 2022 |
Despite our efforts to provide full and correct Xiaomi Poco X4 GT specifications, there is always a possibility of admitting a mistake. If you see any wrong or incomplete data, please
If you are interested in using our specs commercially, check out our Phone specs database licensing page.
Alternative variants
With 256GB internal storage
Differences from the main variant: | |
---|---|
Internal storage | 256GB |
User Reviews
Overall User Rating
Build quality
9
Camera quality
8
Performance
8
Display
8
Battery life and charging
9
Rating breakdown (out of 10)
quadroon
Arena Apprentice
8
I've no qualms
Phone owned for less than 3 months
One of my favorite phones... So far. I purchased this as a replacement for the POCO F4 GT that was stolen from me after I had left it in the back of a Lyft. Phone is day, thanks to the SoC. And the screen is actually pretty damn good for LCD, but I wish it could've been something else. I miss the be 120W charging of the F4 GT, but 67W is still a buttload better than other companies.
9
Build quality
8
Camera quality
8
Performance
8
Display
9
Battery life and charging
What I like
- SoC, 144Hz refresh rate, simple yet nice design
What I don't like
- Maybe a top level LCD screen, but it's still an LCD screen, UI could be better
Did you find this review helpful?
Helpful
Unhelpful
1 out of 1 person found this helpful.
Edit Review
Read Full Review