x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Hidden picShow menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Samsung makes Galaxy J1 2016 official: larger screen, faster chipset

Samsung makes Galaxy J1 2016 official: larger screen, faster chipset

Posted: , by Daniel P.

Tags :

Samsung makes Galaxy J1 2016 official: larger screen, faster chipset

The Galaxy J1 2016 has reared its pretty head here and there before, but all of a sudden Samsung made it official on the hush-hush, and in a place none other than Dubai, which we usually associate with luscious hotels and luxury malls, not humble workhorses of a smartphone.

First off, let's get the specs out of the way. The Galaxy J1 (2016) is an upgrade over its predecessor, which turned out to be ultrapopular with the budget-conscious crowd, selling millions of units last year. In line with the times, the screen of the 4.3" J1 munchkin, has now grown to 4.5 inches, though it still keeps the 480x800 pixels resolution, diminishing the pixel density a bit in the process.

The processing power has seen a more significant upgrade, with a 1.3 GHz quad-core Exynos 3475 running the show. This chipset is built on the 28nm process, and incorporates the Mali-T720 GPU clocked at 600 MHz, so running the Android 5.1.1 Lollipop version that the J1 (2016) ships with shouldn't be an issue, if TouchWiz doesn't get in the way. The 1 GB of DDR3 RAM is a welcome change, too, as the 2015 edition of the J1 shipped with either 512 MB or 768 MB, depending on the model.

Samsung makes Galaxy J1 2016 official: larger screen, faster chipset
The camera combo stays the same, at least when it comes to sensor resolution - a 5 MP rear shooter, coupled with a 2 MP selfie camera at the front. Samsung has doubled the internal storage amount from 4 GB to 8 GB, compared to its predecessor, and also placed a larger, 2050 mAh battery. 

The 4G LTE connectivity now comes standard with the J1 (2016), and, all in all, it sounds like a fine entry level Android handset. With the pricing on display here, which translates to about $135, the Galaxy J1 (2016) might have a steep hill to climb against the Chinese value offerings in the regions it is destined for, though the brand name would certainly earn it some street cred before the competition, what do you think?

source: GSMArena

  • Options

posted on 14 Jan 2016, 02:27

1. GreekGeek (Posts: 1276; Member since: 22 Mar 2014)

480x800 pixels

uhm. NO

posted on 14 Jan 2016, 16:01

8. Well-Manicured-Man (Posts: 428; Member since: 16 Jun 2015)

This is how Samsung destroys its brand. Why even making such phones when Samsung has a many of the best of the best technologies available in house?

Samsung should not offer phones below $400.

posted on 14 Jan 2016, 03:00

2. Lovejoy (Posts: 9; Member since: 04 Aug 2015)

Wow, that's one ugly combination of black and champagne on the bezels. Couldn't just stick to one colour?

posted on 14 Jan 2016, 07:31

6. carlemillward (unregistered)

Yeah, the colours do not blend in with one another.

posted on 14 Jan 2016, 03:05

3. NitishNK (Posts: 36; Member since: 03 Jul 2015)

lol... still people will buy... And after buying will say 's**t-shat' abt this phone... Grt marketing Samsung.... no one z better than u at selling craps.... And people oof...

posted on 14 Jan 2016, 06:17

4. Zackd44 (Posts: 33; Member since: 29 Jun 2015)

No smartphone should come with less than qHD (540x960) at this point. I have the RAZR M which has a 4.3 qHD screen and for a, at the time, mid level phone the screen is very good. It is good as far as todays low end phones go. 480x800 is just unacceptable regardless of the price

posted on 14 Jan 2016, 06:58 1

5. SuperAndroid507 (Posts: 356; Member since: 06 Jan 2014)

"luscious hotels and luxury malls", you forgot "burning towers in New Year's eve"

posted on 14 Jan 2016, 10:23

7. MrElectrifyer (banned) (Posts: 3960; Member since: 21 Oct 2014)

That "gold" version is fugly...

posted on 14 Jan 2016, 22:43

9. yoosufmuneer (Posts: 1518; Member since: 14 Feb 2015)

Not competitive at all but I am sure it will sell in millions in my country. Because people here prefer the brand. Xiaomi's $105 phone is way better than this.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories