Director of National Intelligence says PRISM reports "contain numerous inaccuracies"
Everyone seems to be scrambling on this one, and more and more it looks like we should be suspicious of the reports by The Washington Post and The Guardian. Not only have most of the companies named in The Washington Post report about PRISM data collection denied involvement in any government program; now, the Director of National Intelligence has come out to say the reports "contain numerous inaccuracies".
Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, released a statement saying that there were "numerous inaccuracies" in the reports. He then went on to review Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which the reports cited as reasoning behind the data collection. Clapper finished off his statement as you might expect, by defending the data collection and trying to push blame on the reports.
So, while Clapper may have said there were "inaccuracies", he also seems to admit that the data collection is happening, and he has also said that he wants to make some of the program declassified in order to prove that everything possible is being done to protect civil liberties.
*Update* Clapper has clarified his statement in an interview with the National Journal, answering the question "Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?" by saying:
18 Jun, 2013Google files with secret court to obtain permission to report on two data sets
17 Jun, 2013Eavesdropping scandal escalates: U.S. spied on Russian president Medvedev, other top politicians Apple issues official statement: “we do not provide government with direct access to our servers”
16 Jun, 2013WSJ: NSA does not gather cellphone-location records despite authorization to do so The NSA can listen to your calls without a warrant