What's your opinion of AT&T's plans to purchase T-Mobile US from Deutsche Telekom: Results
It will be some time before we know for sure whether FCC will approve or reject this merger, but nevertheless we were wondering what's your opinion on that matter. Here are the results:
Almost 50% of you (48.04% or 869 votes to be precise) voted that it's yet to be seen whether FCC will approve the deal, but the prospect of AT&T buying T-Mo is not a pleasant one, simply because the former will become too big for the greater good.
27.81% of the people who voted in this poll also voiced their concern over the deal - but for no other reason than the fact T-Mobile offers something different - affordable handsets and data plans.
And then, there are these guys who think the AT&T-T-Mobile merger will benefit everyone, because, according to them and some analysts, prices will go down, while we will see better data plans and faster LTE deployment. These folks are a minority of 24.16%.
1. Sniggly posted on 25 Mar 2011, 10:49 4 1
Yeah, I mean, it's sad that T-Mobile will no longer be around, but I think it's all part of AT&T's attempt to turn its network performance around and try to build an equivalent network to Verizon's.
27. Lucas777 posted on 26 Mar 2011, 01:17 1 2
try and build an equivelant? i think they already do... they really just get bad publicity cause apple sucks at making antennas and that is the only phone att has had for the past 4 years...
29. quadeberg34 posted on 26 Mar 2011, 07:35 1 1
Agreed. I've never had one dropped call with AT&T like everyone claims they have. And even if I had a dropped call every now and then, I have a way better signal with AT&T than I did with Verizon. So I'd rather have enough of a signal to be able to make a call with the slim chance it might get dropped than have no signal at all.
31. CRICKETownz posted on 26 Mar 2011, 12:57 1 0
Thinking that At&t has an equivalent network to Verizon is hilarious. It may be equivalent for you, but to say its equal to Verizon's network across the board is getting a little ahead of yourself. At&t doesn't even believe that there network is on the same level so its funny that you do. Not sure how Apple built At&t's version of the iPhone but my reception has been flawless on mine.
32. CRICKETownz posted on 26 Mar 2011, 12:58 0 0
36. phoneguy17 (unregistered) posted on 28 Mar 2011, 05:58 0 0
Um sorry but I highly disagree with your comment. AT&T was not getting bad publicity because of Apple. It was actually Apple that saved AT&T because though this may be too far back (6 years actually) for most to remember but AT&T was NOT in a good position in the mobile world before the iPhone because at that time it was AT&T/Cingular and they had even worse service then than they do now. So the bad pub was LONG before the iPhone they've just only recently made major strides to improve now with Verizon's LTE in place
2. vvelez5 posted on 25 Mar 2011, 10:54 5 2
I like it. Not only does T-mobile get saved but ATT will become a better network especially in areas where they didnt have great network coverage.
3. Rod Dingo (unregistered) posted on 25 Mar 2011, 11:09 2 9
There are very few places that T-Mobile works and AT&T doesn't.
So your point is invalid for the absolute most part.
5. XxVerbalxX (unregistered) posted on 25 Mar 2011, 11:25 0 4
yeah but hes thinking more on the lines of not just having phone service. 3g/4g and whatnot
7. vvelez5 posted on 25 Mar 2011, 11:28 9 0
Didn't I recently see a map of ATT coverage in West Virginia before the merger and ATT coverage after the merger where the coverage in that area will increase significantly? Just because you don't like the deal doesn't mean that ATT's coverage wont get better.
13. snowgator posted on 25 Mar 2011, 13:39 0 0
Yeah, I was wondering what I missed about AT&T "saving" T-Mobile, too.
14. vvelez5 posted on 25 Mar 2011, 13:50 0 0
I guess "saved" was a poor choice of words. I mean T-Mobile wont be as poor as they are now.
20. Rawrzellers posted on 25 Mar 2011, 21:06 1 1
T-mobile is poor? I think if they were poor they wouldn't be bought for close to 40billion and some of that money having an 8% stake in AT&T. Poor companies get bought for close to nothing. Take Bear Stearns for example. Our government bought them for 2$ a share to save their company. They were poor at the time.
26. vvelez5 posted on 25 Mar 2011, 23:32 1 1
not poor as in how much they are worth. Poor as in a bad company.
33. CRICKETownz posted on 26 Mar 2011, 13:12 0 0
Well if you think about it, you have the 4th largest carrier in the nation purchased at $40 billion. If you think about you have to wonder what it would cost to purchase the other 3 if the guy in last place in worth that much. So in the bigger scheme of things i could see how T-Mobile is viewed as poor...
4. Slammer posted on 25 Mar 2011, 11:15 2 5
What people are forgetting and overlooking as I did myself, ATT has a massive amount of spectrum they had acquired over the last five years. Enough to accomplish their goals. It is sitting dormant. T-mobile built on their spectrum with five years, Verizon is building and utilizing theirs and even Sprint is building and utilizing theirs. Not one ounce of ATT's spectrum has ATT used to date. ATT calls attention to the FCC that ATT needs to acquire T-Mobile, so ATT can improve coverage and quality. Well, what about the spectrum they already have? ATT wants everyone to believe it is good for the consumer, when in fact, it is to suck dry every last bit of spectrum so no other can enter the arena.
This merge needs to stop.
6. XxVerbalxX (unregistered) posted on 25 Mar 2011, 11:26 1 5
i dont care, as long as t-mobile and their pricing is dead im happy
10. Slammer posted on 25 Mar 2011, 11:58 3 3
As an outside consumer, I do care.
The ATT reps fighting for this merge as though it is a sporting event, disappoints me. It shows the limitation of coherency in the magnitude of what effect this will have on us consumers. I do not want our communications industry to end up like our oil industry.
Remember this the next time you have to fill up your car with gas.
28. Lucas777 posted on 26 Mar 2011, 01:20 1 0
i still dont see how anybody can prevent one company from buying another if they have the funds to... i mean how can they even question it... att has the money and dt is selling... simple.
8. WDBJ (unregistered) posted on 25 Mar 2011, 11:53 5 8
AT&T will still blow. Before and after the merge... Just saying
9. SOannoyed (unregistered) posted on 25 Mar 2011, 11:55 14 0
OMG PHONEARENA! Please fix the auto scrolling on the t-mobile ad. Its so annoying. It keeps dragging the page up and down.
11. don.t posted on 25 Mar 2011, 12:22 7 0
In my opinion At&t made a smart business move. If all goes as they plan they will get customers and spectrum. That's the business side. My opinion as a consumer...not happy with this. I saw someone mention Google buying t-mobile and how that would have been great. I agree. That would have made we a happy camper. Right now, I am a very sad and angry camper knowing that my camp will be closed and absorbed into Camp At&t. Camp Google would have been about 170% cooler.
15. WirelessCon posted on 25 Mar 2011, 15:38 1 0
I like the idea, I think this is what AT&T needs to do in order to provide better wireless service. Service is more than a signal, it also refers to tethering, unlimited data, no metering, and no speed ramping/lowering. Signal rules only for voice. Petty data rules will eventually drive customers away. A little cross-pollination with T-Mobile should open some doors.
22. elandrumiii posted on 25 Mar 2011, 21:32 0 2
Who really thinks AT&T will keep any of the T-Mobile plans. They already stated they will shut down Tmo 1700 3G/4G and Tmo customer can move to AT&T plans and phones. They have made it clear that they want the spectrum. They could give a ph@$! about the customers and their plans. It will be higher prices and no unlimited data all around for Tmo customers. Lets be real about and quit blowing smoke. Dear AT&T please lube the Tmo customers up first please.
16. obamabinladin posted on 25 Mar 2011, 17:53 2 2
it's going to be approved by the FCC because at&t is creating millions of jobs and the only thing america cares about right now is creating jobs and at&t is fulfilling obama's ieas for a 4G america. so love or hate at&t there a business and they want to make it big and the only way to do it is beat the system. i don't know why people are complaining sprint was suppose to by t-mobile the same way at&t did so either way t-mobile was gonna get bought just at&t had the cash to make Deutsche Telekom happy
17. corps1089 posted on 25 Mar 2011, 18:32 2 0
Why creating millions of jobs? Mergers always result in streamlining and jobs eliminated. They will not be doing anything new, just swallowing T-Mob's subscriber base and hording the spectrum they bought the rightsn to.
23. elandrumiii posted on 25 Mar 2011, 21:36 1 0
Your name is telling me everything. Sprint bent Nextel over and the started firing the Nextel people after the got what they wanted. The spectrum. There has never been a merger that did not end in massive lay offs. The Southwest/AirTran may not but this will. AT&T really doesnt need any of the Tmo employees because they are pretty much every where Tmo is.
18. GSM_king (unregistered) posted on 25 Mar 2011, 18:54 0 1
Everyone talks about this merger as being bad because T-mobile is cheaper, their plans, unlimited internet, competition, etc. But what your forgetting is, that this same business practice of lower prices and wide range of offering is exactly why the company needed to be sold. Why is Sprint getting mad they are not in that much better shape than T-mobile.
24. elandrumiii posted on 25 Mar 2011, 21:39 0 1
As soon as rates go up and data gets cut your tune will be different. AT&T already wants to meter your home internet.
25. elandrumiii posted on 25 Mar 2011, 21:41 0 0
She will have to work at Dave & Busters as a waitress. You AT&T will give her a pink slip on day three after the deal is approves.
21. Carlos (unregistered) posted on 25 Mar 2011, 21:13 1 1
the merger between the two is not bad at all, i highly doubt poeple that worked for t-mobile will get fired, plus we are talking coverage area everywhere you go. anyways t-mobile was goignt o b baought sooner or later. To bad for sprint they are in the same hole as t-mobile is. and Verizon they can deal with this.
30. Fanboys Suck posted on 26 Mar 2011, 12:45 0 1
You sure don't look at the big picture, eh? When a company buys another company, usually people lose their jobs... You have two of everything: two HR Departments etc... you think they will keep everyone? Your Drunk...
34. applepiter (unregistered) posted on 26 Mar 2011, 20:57 0 0
So disappointed, T-Mobile was a good carrier, and I hate to leave for big red, but I would rather use two coffee cans and a long piece of string than go back to at&t.
35. CDMAJoe posted on 27 Mar 2011, 11:27 0 0
T-mobile hardly has towers in rural areas, and ATT on a national level has poor cell phone signal. So what are both parties getting as the result of this subscribers??? This billing merger is going to cause a lot of angry customers since it is inevitable for billing discrepancies to occur when they eventually combine the billing. In the end T-mobile wins since Deutsche Telekom does not care for there american brand as much as they do there European brand. Prepare for an absolute trainwreck from ATT while Sprint will benefit a lot from just sitting and watching it all happen. Sprint (S) stocks are up and continuing to climb because of this.
37. jaydiggie (unregistered) posted on 28 Mar 2011, 09:27 0 0
I usually reserve my opinions but not after the posts I've seen. First, id like to post a ques whose buying who? ATT rite... well in that case its safe to say that ATT will dictate price structure BUT only bcuz of legal reasons will grandfather current tmo subs with their plans and features. Is it me or hasn't any1 here taken econ classes...if you (ATT) eliminate competition (tmo) and have less choices you dictate how prices will be. It's quite simple really if you think about it. Now we all can speculate and guess till a whole new world has been built but ATT is gettin ready since they loss exclusivity to IPhone. Hence the evident spending and showing all the players quo has the biggest nutsack after Apple jump ship. You know ATT is behind in almost all technology, from 4g to LTE there just trying to play catch up.
What most consumers fail to realize is the panic mode ATT has been in. From their ad. lines 'RETHINK POSSIBLE' who are they fooling. It has been a true sense of catch up since their beloved iPhone has moved Verizon and now their focus is on Android. But let me regress here. After all its speculation at best... but I'm not holding my breath to see what happens next. Msg was sent from my HTC inspire...think bout it
38. donfem (unregistered) posted on 30 Mar 2011, 08:54 0 0
"As long as the pricing is dead,you are happy"? Shows how narrow minded you are.The pricing has kept millions of customers happy and within budget. How happy you must be bothers me,but your ridiculous opinion does not count. A hater you must be.