Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 vs Galaxy S25: Is it time to get a flip phone?

How does a non-foldable flagship phone stacks against its modern and hip flip counterpart? This is our Galaxy Z Flip 7 vs Galaxy S25 comparison!

0comments
We may earn a commission if you make a purchase from the links on this page.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 vs Galaxy S25: Is it time to get a flip phone?

Intro


Foldable phones have been around for more than five years now, and the million-dollar question is still up in the air and more relevant than ever. Is it time to give these devices a chance? The timing is perfect, because we've just got the next big thing in flip phones, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7.

Samsung's next foldable flagship polishes and refines the flip idea further and is the best option if you want to dip your toes in this specific water, or should we say form factor.

On the other hand, we have rigid and conventional phones to choose from, and the Galaxy S25 is a perfect example, especially because it's more or less the non-folding alternative of the Galaxy Z Flip 7.

So, let's compare these two and see who wins the battle for the heart of the Samsung fan.

Pre-order the Galaxy Z Flip 7 for up to $720 off

$499 99
$1219 99
$720 off (59%)
Pre-order the Galaxy Z Flip 7 at Samsung and save $120 as a free storage upgrade on the 512GB variant. On top of that, you'll save up to $600 with eligible device trade-ins. Alternatively, you can get it with a $150 Samsung Instant Credit.
Pre-order at Samsung

Pre-order the Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE for up to $560 off

$399 99
$959 99
$560 off (58%)
For the first time, Samsung launched a Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE alongside the flagship flip phone. Pre-order the budget flip phone at the Samsung Store and save up to $500 with eligible trade-ins. On top of that, the 256GB model is $60 off before trade-ins.
Pre-order at Samsung

Galaxy Z Flip 7 vs Galaxy S25 differences:



Table of Contents:

Also read:

Design and Size

To flip or not to flip?

This is the ultimate question when it comes to comparing a conventional, rigid phone with a flexible-screen foldable (or, in this case, flip) device. On the one hand, we have a tad more compact phone in the face of the Galaxy S25, but you can't fold it in half and put it inside a tight pocket or a small purse.

On the other hand, the Galaxy Z Flip 7 becomes this tiny square when folded, but it's a bit thicker, and you also have to unfold it every time you need to do something complicated—the cover screen can only do so much. 

So, at the end of the day, it's whether you're okay with folding and unfolding your phone tens of times a day or you prefer a "permanently unfolded" device, albeit a bit larger.

Here are some hard numbers when it comes to size and weight.


In terms of materials, things are pretty similar—we have the same glass and metal sandwich design, but because the Galaxy Z Flip 7 has to bend in half (physics!), the display is just softer. There's a coating to prevent scratches and scuffs, but it's nothing like the Gorilla Glass on top of the Galaxy S25's screen. So, this has to be taken into consideration.

The colors situation is in favor of the Galaxy S25, as there are more hues available, but the Galaxy Z Flip 7 comes in fresh colors as well. Here's a quick comparison table.



Display Differences

Two versus one

We're back at the folding debate. Actually, the Galaxy Z Flip 7 sports a pretty big 6.9-inch main screen, which is an advantage over the 6.2-inch conventional screen of the Galaxy S25.

There's, of course, a secondary cover screen, so you don't have to open the phone every time you need to do something quick. This time around it's a 4.1" AMOLED with 120Hz refresh rate, so Samsung has upped its game with the Galaxy Z Flip 7.


In terms of brightness, the Galaxy Z Flip mimics the peak brightness of the Galaxy S25 coming in at 2600 nits. Speaking of which, the Galaxy S25 managed to output almost 2400 nits at 20% APL (and around 1300 nits at 100% APL). Pretty impressive!

Display Measurements:




Both screens on the Galaxy Z Flip 7 have the 120 Hz refresh rate treatment, but the main one is an LTPO covering 1-120 Hz, while the cover has a fixed 60/120 Hz refresh rate. The Galaxy S25, of course, uses the same LTPO tech and is able to go between 1 and 120Hz with everything in between.

Performance and Software

Exynos vs Snapdragon

The Galaxy Z Flip 7 is the first phone to feature Samsung's new 3nm Exynos 2500 chipset. The Galaxy S25 is part of the latest flagship family and thus comes with the aforementioned industry standard - the Snapdragon 8 Elite processor, which has been specially tuned "for Galaxy." This means a slight overclock of the performance cores.

The Galaxy S25 managed around 3000 and 9000 points in the Geekbench single- and multi-core tests, which is a normal result for a Snapdragon 8 Elite phone. Check out the benchmarks below.


Recommended Stories

Performance Benchmarks:


Geekbench 6
SingleHigher is better
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 72177
Samsung Galaxy S253031
Geekbench 6
MultiHigher is better
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 77419
Samsung Galaxy S259626
3DMark Extreme(High)Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 74137
Samsung Galaxy S255959
3DMark
Extreme(Low)Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 71980
Samsung Galaxy S252500

The benchmarks clearly show that the Exynos 2400 is no match for the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. We can't help but wonder why Samsung opted not to give its newest flip phones the Elite treatment that the Z Fold 7 received. But it is what it is.

The hardware situation is actually identical, because the RAM on board is 12GB on both phones, and the storage options are also the similar—the S25 starts at 128GB and goes up to 512GB, while the Galaxy Z Flip 7 skips the 128GB variant. 

The Galaxy Z Flip 7 launches with OneUI 8 out of the box over Android 16. Both the Galaxy Z Flip 7 and the Galaxy S25 will be supported for seven long years and will receive all the AI goodness that's inevitably "to come" in the future. So, it's more or less a tie in this section.

Camera

How badly do you need that telephoto?

Another area where these two phones are very, very similar. They both have 50MP main cameras with similar aperture and sensor size. The ultrawide cameras on both are also almost identical, with just a tiny difference in the FOV (probably the positioning of the lenses). 

The biggest difference, of course, is the presence of a dedicated telephoto camera on the Galaxy S25. This will inevitably result in a higher camera score for the S25 when compared to the Galaxy Z Flip 7.


PhoneArena Camera Score:


Photo
Video
Phone Camera
Score
Photo
Score
Main
(wide)
Ultra
Wide
Selfie Zoom
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 139 146 79 19 27 23
Samsung Galaxy S25 147 151 80 21 27 23
Phone Camera
Score
Video
Score
Main
(wide)
Ultra
Wide
Selfie Zoom
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 139 133 73 19 24 18
Samsung Galaxy S25 147 142 74 21 26 21
Find out more details about photo and video scores for all phones we have tested on our PhoneArena Camera Score page

Speaking of camera scores, the Galaxy S25 managed an overall score of 147 (out of 158), which is a pretty decent result! The Galaxy Z Flip 7 wasn't able to match that, but, as always, we will snap some comparison samples and see what the real-life differences are.

Battery Life and Charging

A slight advantage for the flip?

The Galaxy Z Flip 7 brings a slightly larger battery compared to its predecessor, with a capacity of 4,300mAh. In contrast, the Galaxy S25 comes equipped with a 4,000 mAh cell, which is a bit on the lower side nowadays.

We have to bear in mind the fact that the Galaxy Z Flip 7 has two displays, so it potentially needs more power, but we need to run our battery tests to evaluate how much more exactly (if any). The Galaxy S25 scored 7h 6m overall in our battery test, which ranks it #60 among all phones tested in the past 2 years. Not great, not terrible—just a good average score.


PhoneArena Battery Test Results:


Battery Life
Charging
Phone Battery Life
estimate
Browsing Video Gaming
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7
4300 mAh
7h 3min 18h 58min 9h 32min 7h 31min
Samsung Galaxy S25
4000 mAh
7h 6min 18h 29min 8h 1min 12h 20min
Phone Full Charging 30 min Charge
Wired Wireless Wired Wireless
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7
4300 mAh
Untested Untested Untested Untested
Samsung Galaxy S25
4000 mAh
1h 22min 1h 37min 54% 32%
Find out more details about battery and charging for all phones we have tested on our PhoneArena Battery Score page

The battery benchmark results are almost identical, but there are some differences in the underlying components of the benchmark. If you like to play mobile games, the Galaxy S25 will last more, so bear this in mind. 

Overall, the Galaxy Z Flip 7 performed admirably in this test, much better than its predecessor, and now battery life is not a deciding factor when you have to choose between the Z Flip 7 and the S25.

Charging speeds continue to be pretty slow on most Samsung devices, and the Galaxy S25 is no exception. 25W wired charging and 15W wireless are anything but fast, but it is what it is. Sadly, the Galaxy Z Flip 7 seems to adhere to these speeds, at least when it comes to wired charging, and won't be setting any records either.

Specs Comparison




Summary


And here we are! These two are very similar in so many areas that the question unsurprisingly boils down to the same "do you need a foldable device" mantra. There are some differences to help you make up your mind, though.

The Galaxy S25 is cheaper, it has one additional telephoto camera, and it's more compact than the unfolded Z Flip 7. But on the other hand, you can't reproduce the experience of having a flip phone that folds in half, and those minor advantages we mention might be irrelevant if you've decided to go for it.

The Exynos 2500 inside the Galaxy Z Flip 7 is not on par with the overclocked Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite inside that the Galaxy S25 sports. But at the end of the day, you will be happy with either of these two phones. Just ask yourselves the same old question, to fold or not to fold!

Loading Comments...

Latest Discussions

by Avalanche1 • 4
by JinVentura • 4

Recommended Stories

FCC OKs Cingular\'s purchase of AT&T Wireless