The Nokia 9 PureView might have been delayed... Again

The SD845 isn't a bad chip considering the 6T uses it and it is still the best phone ever. But I agree though the delays will probably end up making it a disappointment.

It is a good chip for sure, but the sd855 is far better, not just in performance and efficiency but it also has several new cool features up its sleeve. For the price the Nokia 9 will be sold for you'd expect it to at least have the sd855.. And since its getting released around the same time as other phones with sd855 it will have a hard time competing, it may be a very good phone for sure but I don't know if it will be able to justify its high price. Maybe if its camera is as good as its being hyped up to be.. Idk

Bestzt phone ever in your dreams, s9 plus destroy it.

Lol, I do agree that the S9+ is better overall.

I agree. Specs mean little vs real life usage. It’s not like the SD845 is going to suddenly stop working once the SD855 is released.

Yes, it's definitely going to be better. Unlike you, I do heavy work on my phone and want the best SoC not only bcoz of that, but also bcoz I'm giving my hard earned money to Nokia. The phone may have other great specs, but why the heck would I buy it when I can get other similar or better phones with a better SoC. And the 855 might also be better forbfuture-proofing and battery life. Think about that! If u wanna spend money on this with an 845 then go ahead, no one's stopping you. But I wanna make a smarter choice....

What did you buy last year or the year before? Were those phones not capable of doing your "heavy work"? The latest and greatest doesn't equate to better. Qualcomm saw this firsthand when they replaced the SD805 with the 810. That was a colossal failure because lab tests and the real world are 2 different animals. People like you who grate the company's cheese demanding the newest toy pressure them into releasing products that haven't been properly tested.

What kind of monkey would want to pay 2019 price for a phone with 2018 specs?

I don't know about monkeys but apparently a buffalo would....

Very very upper echelon of mid range MG ;)

LMAO!

Nokia honestly doesn't have a good reason as to why they couldn't use the SD855. The 845 isn't bad by any means, but they're really being lazy here. They're putting too much focus on the cameras, and if the cameras aren't good, the whole thing will fail.

1) Nokia doesn't make smartphones anymore. It's HMD that makes Nokia branded smartphones now, for more than 2 years now. 2) HMD has a very good reason why the SD845 is being used as opposed to the SD855: The Nokia 9 was in development long before the SD855 was out. Do you know how much longer it would be before this is released if they they now switched up to use the 855? How many more people would be complaining about it? How many of those complaining are actually even going to buy one, even if it was released with the SD855? The SoC isn't the only thing that makes a smartphone good. It's an important component, but even you admit that the SD845 isn't bad. Taking all of that into consideration, how many people do you think are here complaining just for the sake of complaining? I can point out at least one person here who is.

Hey, I have my opinion, you have yours, we can agree to disagree. And by Nokia I meant HMD, it's like referring to Samsung Electronics as Samsung.

This phone's been in development for some time now. HMD would have to scrap everything and optimize for the 855 if they were to go that route. Do you think putting together a piece of equipment as sophisticated as today's smartphones is an easy chore? You need to educate yourself a wee bit more before calling anybody lazy.

When I said lazy, I merely meant not up to the standards of other flagships. Of course I know that this phone's been in development for a while and suddenly switching to the 855 was never going to be easy. What I meant is that this feels like it's going to be a half-baked product. Notice that I didn't say that there's no reason for it not to have the 855, I said there's no GOOD reason. Also, I knew that HMD owned Nokia, but I feel like if the phones are branded Nokia, people aren't going to say that they're made by HMD. I see people complaining about mainstream brands like Apple and Samsung consistently, so why is my criticism of Nokia not accepted here?

HMD DOES NOT own Nokia. Where did you get your false info from? HMD ONLY builds Nokia branded smartphones via licensing deal with Nokia, which is a separate entity entirely. The product isn't even released yet, so how can you assume it's "half-baked"? All of a sudden the SD845, 5 back camera's, and an in-sceeen fingerprint reader means "half-baked"? I see people respond to people who complain about mainstream brands like Apple and Samsung. This is to be expected in an open forum, do how come you're not accepting it here? And you can't complain about anyone not accepting your complaints when you didn't accept my initial comment that you responded to. Pot, meet kettle.