Lumia 1020 beats the iPhone 5s and Galaxy S4 by a mile in our blind camera comparison

Lumia 1020 beats the iPhone 5s and Galaxy S4 by a mile in our blind camera comparison
And so it is time for us to reveal the smartphones that took part in the blind camera comparison that we published last week. The idea was, basically, to come up with a camera contest that factors out all possible bias one might have towards a certain brand, model or OS. By the looks of it, we've succeeded in removing bias from the equation as no one ever knew which model hid behind which phone number, and so everyone voted for the images they think are better, rather than for their favorite phone.

It's quite obvious for everyone who followed the development of the voting phase that this turned out to be a rather one-sided contest. 'Phone 5' ended up so far ahead of the others, that it made some people think this isn't exactly a phone like all the others. And to an extent, they were right, as 'Phone 5' was the Nokia Lumia 1020. Packing that beefy 41 MP PureView camera,  the Lumia 1020 is really a true heavyweight smartphone that doesn't have the sexiness of those iOS and Android powerhouses, but makes up for it by featuring this amazing camera, which happens to be way better than what the best camera phones of those other ecosystems can offer. And so, with the whopping 62% of all votes, the Lumia 1020 has left the Galaxy S4 (2nd, with 20% of the votes) and the iPhone 5s (3rd, with 11% of the votes) far, far behind. The other three smartphones that took part in the competition were left with the laughable 2.6% for the LG G2, 1.5% for the iPhone 5c, and 1.3% for the HTC One.

When you think about it, the Nokia Lumia 1020 was obliged to win this one. After all, it's so thick and bulky and uninviting, only because of the camera it packs. Well, Windows Phone itself also has a hand in it being so uninviting, but that's a different story. Anyway, now that we've revealed the cameraphones, are you surprised by the results?

Which cameraphone do you like best?

Samsung Galaxy S4
Apple iPhone 5c
Apple iPhone 5s
Nokia Lumia 1020



1. Vireak unregistered

No surprises there.

62. Finalflash

Posts: 4063; Member since: Jul 23, 2013

It isn't, the 1020 has a great camera. But they need to do the test with better control, because some of the pictures were just taken at different times, at slightly different angles and some even had motion blur. They need to do it with a tripod that puts all the camera in the same situation and reduces human error as much as possible. And also name the items in the chart differently, for some reason I kept reading "Phone 5" as iPhone 5 in this article and the poll (automatic now I guess). Still, hopefully this becomes a thing, where maybe they do this once a month and average scores as time goes on.

91. haseebzahid

Posts: 1853; Member since: Feb 22, 2012

err yeah lame escuse so what the point of OIS in 1020 then if you need tripod O_o its not a 2013 tech it was there for 10++ years in camera why you want to do that when u wont hold u precious iphone in tripod every time you take a picture

104. Shatter

Posts: 2036; Member since: May 29, 2013

I think they should have a high end DLSR in these comparisons as a reference photo.

119. brrunopt

Posts: 742; Member since: Aug 15, 2013

do you always take a tripod with you ?

138. ardent1

Posts: 2000; Member since: Apr 16, 2011

That only makes senses for INDOOR shots. The ceteris paribus condition doesn't work as well for outdoor shots.

175. ghaniosman

Posts: 78; Member since: Jun 06, 2013

adding lumia 1020 in the comparison was itself bias in the 1st place, since its a camera with a smart?phone in it and others were smartphones with cameras in them

180. venimus

Posts: 2; Member since: Oct 09, 2013

Really? Is this all you could come to?

191. ShenAlJoker

Posts: 113; Member since: Jul 19, 2013

oh shut up! lumia rules!!!!!!!!!!!

63. ianbbaa

Posts: 332; Member since: Mar 20, 2013

I am not surprised that people are not blind...but probably someone in iPhone Arena will be fired to leave S4 in front of iP5s

150. htainlintha

Posts: 73; Member since: Mar 20, 2010

Dude, SGS4 is a clear winner in compared to ip5S, do you think phone can go over it? overall, SGS4 rocks with great camera,slimmer, removeable battery and expandable micro SD,13MP shooter with focal length 2.2 aprture(same with ip5S)but bigger megapixel provide more details,ip5S high-pixel density is as fail as HTC one, SGS4 has stereo recording and has capability of recording slow-motion at 1/2,1/4 and 1/8 speed. LOL! why do you think ip5s's crappy camera is better than SGS4?

75. Droid_X_Doug

Posts: 5993; Member since: Dec 22, 2010

Quite true. And in other news, the L1020 will be a sales fail in the U.S. courtesy of Nokia's carrier exclusive with AT&T. Hopefully MS ends the stupidity of carrier exclusives.

106. Shatter

Posts: 2036; Member since: May 29, 2013

Its Microsoft, don't expect anything from them.

121. Droid_X_Doug

Posts: 5993; Member since: Dec 22, 2010

Ordinarily, I wouldn't hold out hope for MS. But they don't normally do things that are against their self interest (increasing the market penetration of WP, in this circumstance). The carrier exclusive was a plan to fail and the only justification was the marketing $ that AT&T was going to put on the table. MS doesn't need AT&T's marketing $, so I am hopeful the carrier exclusives are over with.

192. Stoli89

Posts: 333; Member since: Jun 28, 2010

Elop probably chose to go with the AT&T exclusive because he was worried that his chair in the corner office in Redmond might be getting cold. A 1020 hit would've made a sale of D&S to MSFT less likely, or at a much higher purchase price...neither would've made his handlers at MSFT very happy.

83. akki20892

Posts: 3902; Member since: Feb 04, 2013

true no phone can't even compare with 1020, i was telling you guys that Phone-5 is Nokia Lumia 1020.

140. Shatter

Posts: 2036; Member since: May 29, 2013

It was pretty obvious it was going to win, its about as good as a mid range point and shoot.

163. Trex95

Posts: 2383; Member since: Mar 03, 2013

Seems that you forget about PV 808 still better than Lumia 1020 in camera dept.

169. akki20892

Posts: 3902; Member since: Feb 04, 2013

I don't mind as longest phone is Nokia.

120. Immolate

Posts: 310; Member since: Jun 17, 2011

I'm sure this has been said a thousand times already, but why was the Z1 left out? If you didn't have the phone in time, you maybe should have waited, or now that you do have it, I'd do another comparison. That said, I've looked at Z1/1020 comparisons extensively and, as a result, I bought the 1020. Should be here today.

124. downphoenix

Posts: 3165; Member since: Jun 19, 2010

credit where it is due, but it is still pretty strange. I remember ther was an LG G2 comparison done with other phones a while back (including the Lumia 1020) which wasnt a blidn comparison, and the G2 was way above the lumia.

137. hmmm...

Posts: 81; Member since: Jun 05, 2013

I remember those comparism. There was no verdict for that, so how was the g2's camera better than 1020?. The G2 actually fail to even focus on the bowl of chips on the table.

2. ArtSim98

Posts: 3535; Member since: Dec 21, 2012

What? No Xperia Z1? Why PA why?!

21. brar.arsh

Posts: 202; Member since: Sep 12, 2012

This test was for the Second position. Z1 has been kept aside and already crowned the BEST. :p

34. raunak

Posts: 507; Member since: Oct 12, 2011

Keep on dreaming. Anyone who is not an idiot will realise that a 1/2.3" sensor cannot even come close to a 1/1.5" one. That is as long as they are similar in other aspects, which they are. And sony always messes their cameras (and screens) up. Xperia Z's camera was terrible, and I hoped sony will finally cure that with a bigger sensor, but no. Z1 is no better than S4. Read some reviews and you'll know.

47. emadshiny

Posts: 1144; Member since: Dec 05, 2012

It seems you have never hold Z in your hands or you won't post such a bullsh*t. Z problem was its software and after first update it became great but the problem of people like you is that you trust in whatever some biased sites say. and about Z1. its quality came near 1020 with half of its resolution and smaller sensor. So i think its you who must read some reviews.

55. ianbbaa

Posts: 332; Member since: Mar 20, 2013

Every company sometimes release a bad firmware - regarding SONY, when i was SONY customer - i was always reading "update will solve it" - never did, so SONYs problem is not software, but all the time - a bad made phone. So, forget SONY for some not mention Z1 - as already we know Z2 is on the way that should polish the bugs of Z1 (Z1 is mentioned to polish bugs of original Z) - so FORGET FIRMWARE UPDATE!!!!! SONY needs every half a year a SAME flagship... P.S: Samsung also messed totally JB update of original NOTE1 that i had to sell it. No company is perfect, but at least my NOTE1 worked fine since GB through ICS untill JB...SONYs phone usually do not work from "out of the box".

61. emadshiny

Posts: 1144; Member since: Dec 05, 2012

But i never had such a problem. maybe you were unlucky with your Sony!

58. raunak

Posts: 507; Member since: Oct 12, 2011

It's quality improved only a little bit with update. It's still not as good as other top end phones. And NO, Z1 never came close to 1020, never. Those "comparisons" that surfaced when Z1 was launched were from sony themselves, and were extremely biased. All the reviews that came after that have said what I just said.

68. emadshiny

Posts: 1144; Member since: Dec 05, 2012

LOL, they were biased? i suggest you look at the quality of Z1 camera through different firmwares. and its shots at night

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.