x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Hidden picShow menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Note 5 could come with UHD 2160×3840 pixels display, and a dual-edge version with record 762ppi

Note 5 could come with UHD 2160×3840 pixels display, and a dual-edge version with record 762ppi

Posted: , by Daniel P.

Tags:

Samsung's mobile display roadmap for 2015 includes Ultra HD resolution panels

Samsung's mobile display roadmap for 2015 includes Ultra HD resolution panels


Samsung confirmed in its Analyst Days presentation slides a while ago that it has a Ultra HD 2160 x 3840 pixels Super AMOLED displays for mobile in the works for 2015, as you can see above. Also, at a Semiconductor and Display Technology Roadmap workshop last year, Samsung presenters hinted again at having higher-resolution UHD smartphone displays in the pipeline. These resolutions, however, were mentioned then together with the "diamond pixel" term, which is a fancy way to say a non-standard pixel matrix arrangement, that is closer to PenTile, than the standard RGB stripe matrix. In any case, at 700+ ppi, nobody would notice the individual pixels anyway.

Furthermore, we received a word that Samsung will be putting those UHD Super AMOLED panels in none other than the Galaxy Note 5, and will start the displays' production in August, which would jibe with an eventual September announcement around the IFA 2015 expo. The exact diagonals are said to be 5.78" for the inevitable dual edge Note 5, and 5.89 inches for the regular, flat display version. These return exactly 762ppi and 748ppi, respectively, or the highest pixel densities ever attempted on a phone, if this Note 5 speculation pans out. The more, the merrier.

Thanks for the tip!

92 Comments
  • Options
    Close




posted on 09 Apr 2015, 03:19 9

1. vincelongman (Posts: 4102; Member since: 10 Feb 2013)


Great for VR
But hopefully there's an app to manage which res each app is, like what Nvidia have
E.g. then you could set games to 1080p to save battery

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 03:44 21

10. AnTuTu (Posts: 1578; Member since: 14 Oct 2012)


Oh boy!!!

I am just speechless right now but will say bring it on Sammy :p

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 03:58 1

18. ferretsama (Posts: 32; Member since: 27 Nov 2014)


that would only increase performance since all the pixels are still being lit up, unless you set the game to run only on a fraction of the screen (ie. only 1080x1920 pixels used, the rest are inactive)

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 05:16 2

37. vincelongman (Posts: 4102; Member since: 10 Feb 2013)


So you're telling me it doesn't use more power to render games at 4K than 1080p?

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 05:29 2

38. Settings (Posts: 1467; Member since: 02 Jul 2014)


The stress the processor makes is less than of 4K compared to 1080p.
The processor has to push more pixels at the same time maintain stable frame rate at 4K.

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 06:55 1

46. brunelian92 (Posts: 79; Member since: 04 Feb 2015)


In that case why bother having a more powerful processor if your not going to use it?

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 09:07 1

59. singhkaran9830 (unregistered)


The GPU will have much less load too.

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 13:49

78. Mysta (Posts: 1; Member since: 09 Apr 2015)


There's an app called Pixel Off that lets you turn off pixels to varying degrees and in certain situations.(Only Amoled screens can do this, I believe.

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 03:21 6

2. vergil9 (banned) (Posts: 517; Member since: 06 Apr 2015)


I hope this remains a rumor, I would take better 3D performance and better battery life over this "ever so slightly better screen when the phone is so close it is sticking to my nose"-screen.
I like the dual edge though.

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 03:27 1

4. vergil9 (banned) (Posts: 517; Member since: 06 Apr 2015)


Not exactly a rumor. My bad.

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 03:26 5

3. arch_angel (Posts: 1651; Member since: 20 Feb 2015)


holy s**t the strain all those pixels will put on the soc. damn Samsung don't you think qhd is enough right now. the note 5 will probably not have the greatest benchmark scores if its using the 7420 like the gs6, it will still be a great phone so wtf lol. uhd would be great for a 12in galaxy tab though ;)

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 03:42 11

9. DBounce (Posts: 144; Member since: 26 Apr 2014)


Go to bestbuy and try out Gear VR with a Note 4 and then eat your words. With VR qhd looks like standard definition tv... if not worst. 4k is the minimum needed on the Note 5 to support Gear VR while having a watchable picture. To be honest 8k would probably be ideal.

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 04:38 8

31. arch_angel (Posts: 1651; Member since: 20 Feb 2015)


Yeah i know all about vr but im not going to eat my words because i don't like vr. and what i said is true and if you include vr it is still true. but yeah if you like vr and low benchmark scores, lag when playing games, low fps rates, then the uhd note 5 will be perfect for you.

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 07:19 3

50. HomerS (Posts: 168; Member since: 19 Sep 2014)


Samsung is working on their own custom cpu and also custom gpu if they release that they should have enough power to handle 4k.

But not sure if they will release that already with the Note 5 or with the S7.

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 10:03

65. arch_angel (Posts: 1651; Member since: 20 Feb 2015)


I know I can't wait to see the performance of sammys custom soc it's going to Be a beast no doubt. But I don't think it will arrive in the note 5 and this 3k screen res rumor is probably not going to be true anyway.

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 14:48

81. Techist (Posts: 227; Member since: 27 Jan 2015)


I was thinking the same (i.e. that the custom SoC would not arrive until in time for the Note 5 or S7) until I recently came across reports that Samsung's custom cpu, codenamed "Mongoose" has already been benchmarked on Geekbench where it returns a monstrous 2200 single core test result, higher than any other mobile SoC presently out there - and that includes Nvidia's Denver K1 in the Nexus 9 (the reigning single core leader), Apple's A8X in the iPad Air 2, and the Snapdragon 810, among others. If those benchmark results are true (and they seem to be as per sammobile and other reputable sources), then maybe that chip isn't too far off the horizon...

posted on 10 Apr 2015, 12:17

88. Techielover (Posts: 105; Member since: 20 Feb 2015)


They were rumored to be designing a custom gpu too so lets hope it makes a debut on the note 5 and balance that monstrous UHD display.

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 03:30

5. marchulya (Posts: 46; Member since: 18 Nov 2014)


holy mother!!!! that's the tendency now. hope for an outstanding hardware inside )))

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 03:34 8

6. Tommy-Ka (Posts: 33; Member since: 10 Jul 2014)


Why even a higher res FFS? I thought QHD is the limit of stupidity, I see I was wrong...

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 04:23 4

27. dimas (Posts: 1896; Member since: 22 Jul 2014)


Before, I also thought that pushing QHD is useless and don't have benefits but I realized that it is good for competition because 1080 displays will become affordable. Not all manufacturers wanted QHD and 700+ ppi on their phones so this will be win win situation for the consumers. More devices, lower prices.

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 14:43

80. JumpinJackROMFlash (Posts: 448; Member since: 10 Dec 2014)


For VR this will be awesome! Can't wait!

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 03:38 6

7. GeekMovement (Posts: 2140; Member since: 09 Sep 2011)


And here I am with my 720p 5.5" screen...

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 03:40

8. maherk (Posts: 3415; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)


I am not worried about the resolution, i am more worried about thr increase of the size of the screen. 5.7" is more than enough for a Note phablet, 5.9" is too much!! LG could work it out with their implementations of slim bezels, not Samsung. I was happy that Samsung didn't increase thr screen size from the Note 3 to Note 4 and S5 to the S6, so i hope this is just a speculation.

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 03:46 4

14. galanoth (Posts: 425; Member since: 26 Nov 2011)


Samsung does slim bezels.

Note 4 ~74% screen to body.
G3 ~75% screen to body.

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 06:19

42. maherk (Posts: 3415; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)


That 1% will make a difference when we are talking about a 5.9" screen. 5.7" is the perfect size for the Note.

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 03:45 4

11. amasog (Posts: 338; Member since: 22 Aug 2013)


UHD? Wow! another gimmick!! but thats what gullible fandroids want even if not necessary,,, for bragging purposes. LOL!

anyway, good luck with the battery!!!

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 03:52 7

16. tedkord (Posts: 10231; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)


I think gimmick doesn't mean what you think it means.

And we heard the same battery cry at each resolution bump, and each time it didn't matter because the screen and CPU and ram got more efficient.

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 04:07 5

21. Djz89 (Posts: 271; Member since: 25 Aug 2014)


Imagine the power and battery if would have at 1080. i don't believe anyone can tell the difference, specially from QHD to UHD on a freaking 5"phone.

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 04:41

32. arch_angel (Posts: 1651; Member since: 20 Feb 2015)


i can tell the difference from FHD to QHD but UHD will most likely look just like QHD. somebody said something about vr benefiting from it which is true so if you like vr then the increase in screen res is great news.

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 04:23

26. E.N. (Posts: 2610; Member since: 25 Jan 2009)


As long as we can see a difference, I'm all for it. If not, they're wasting their resources

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 07:04 3

48. 99nights (Posts: 1152; Member since: 10 Mar 2015)


The note 4 has a better battery life than the iphone 6 (is what I'm guessing you are referring to) and it has a qhd screen.
Most people can brag about is watching 4k youtube vids lol.

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 07:37 16

55. kryme (Posts: 327; Member since: 24 Oct 2013)


Are you not tired of saying Wat is a gimmick or not... Few years ago big screen phone was a gimmick... Now Ur fruity pebble company has big screen and now no one is saying big screen is gimmick... I'll pay $800 for a 4k phone.. Than paying $800 for a 750p phone... And by now u know Samsung don't have a battery problem even wen they give a smaller battery with higher res screen and a more powerful soc... Samsung moto= if the technology is available then customers should have it... Apple moto= why bother to give these brainwashed idiots the latest tech if they are willing to pay $800 for 4yr old tech

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 08:38 1

57. ShaikhJGI (Posts: 158; Member since: 10 Jan 2014)


Awesome post bro...+10

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 09:12 2

60. singhkaran9830 (unregistered)


LOL!Steve jobs be like "WOW QHD,well be using it in our iphone 9S+ exclusively and call it revolutionary in mobile industry".

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 03:45

12. amasog (Posts: 338; Member since: 22 Aug 2013)


(((-_-)))

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 03:45

13. amasog (Posts: 338; Member since: 22 Aug 2013)


((,:.))

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 03:46 1

15. Symon_Fleece (Posts: 335; Member since: 30 May 2014)


That was insane! 762 PPI is very sharp! But the 500 PPI is enough, i don't how the battery life is when the UHD is in the note 5

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 10:20

67. j2001m (Posts: 2788; Member since: 28 Apr 2014)


In the s6 it's not the screens that does the damage to battery, it takes less battery then the s5 screen, it's only lcd like on the lg G4 that going to take battery power oled is not the same, it will just take an hit in gpu score when they run 4k test but with no games, it will not bea real time problem

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 16:21

84. zachki17 (Posts: 261; Member since: 14 Sep 2014)


LG G4 will use a new generation of display Led Quantom its not LCD .. Its the best display ustil now

posted on 07 May 2015, 15:19

91. ShaikhJGI (Posts: 158; Member since: 10 Jan 2014)


LED Quantum? hahahahaa are you serious? :D
Its an LCD display with Quantum dot technology used to boost the colors as close to AMOLED displays as possible.
110% in Sammy Amoled & 98% in G4 its close though.
Advantage sammy have is it can go back to nearest color accurate gamut of 0% 6550K with upto 1-2% difference in its basic mode which your Quantum dot cannot & be there at 98% all the time.

Such a brainwashed fool you are lolzz. Go hide somewhere before making fool of yourself :D
And next time research before commenting.

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 03:52 1

17. XaErO (Posts: 302; Member since: 25 Sep 2012)


These new changes are always welcome !!

I think; for any display tech, power consumption should be the primary factor to consider and also the color accuracy than just bumping-up the screen resolution !!

I don't mind having those displays on smartphone; but they should not draw more power than 1080p (Super AMOLED) display !!

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 10:22

68. j2001m (Posts: 2788; Member since: 28 Apr 2014)


The s6 screen takes less power than the s5 screen

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 03:58 5

19. Cyan3boN (Posts: 444; Member since: 23 Feb 2012)


cmon guys, A fHD display is more than enough for a 5 to 6 inch display, Don't kill performance for the sake of numbers

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 09:15

61. singhkaran9830 (unregistered)


S6 with a QHD screen performs better than any FHD phone.It might also do the same

posted on 07 May 2015, 15:22

92. ShaikhJGI (Posts: 158; Member since: 10 Jan 2014)


I don't mind having a UHD diplay if Note 5's 4K display draws as much power or even less for that matter as LG G4 QHD lcd panel does. Just give us a beast of an SOC sammy so that performance is not pushed backwards. Lot to come from you :)

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 04:05

20. Djz89 (Posts: 271; Member since: 25 Aug 2014)


That's super nessesery....

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 04:11 17

22. pendragon0202 (Posts: 88; Member since: 23 Feb 2015)


For ppl here crying out loud saying XXX is enough, and XXX is a gimmick... If all mankind was like you guys, I bet we are still living in a cave eating raw meat. Fortunately, more of us pushed the limit and always seek for areas of improvement. That is how the technology always progressed. And regardless of current need of satisfaction we continuously aim for the future. That is what we often call an "innovation".

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 04:42 1

33. dimas (Posts: 1896; Member since: 22 Jul 2014)


Supernova Junior?

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 07:31 3

52. FluffyBled (Posts: 470; Member since: 10 Sep 2014)


He has a point actually! SuperNova or not!

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 08:40 1

58. ShaikhJGI (Posts: 158; Member since: 10 Jan 2014)


Good Point sirr Well said :)

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 12:43 1

75. UglyFrank (Posts: 1580; Member since: 23 Jan 2014)


They would prefer us to walk, let alone invent the wheel

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 04:12 1

23. rubyonrails3 (Posts: 245; Member since: 01 Oct 2014)


This is awesome. I can buy HTC with FHD but not samsung. Samsung is great with QHD displays, that's one of reason I thinks to try Samsung(and yes I bought Note 4 cuz of display though I've sell it after a month probably cuz of TW). I know we can't see the difference, but of course we feel the difference. How sharp text looks and crisp. I guess Samsung is planning to use UHD as they used small battery on S6 and have one day battery on it. so with bigger battery I guess Note 5 will do okay. I'm bit concern about the size though, Note 4 size was perfect, but Nexus 6 it was way too big for me(yes I've bought Nexus 6 after Note 4 ). If I didn't pick up S6 then for sure I'd be trying again Samsung Note, and this time its fifth iteration. I'm not fan of Samsung, but I do admire them with what they did with S6, which makes Note 4 even more tempting to me. HTC is cursed by SD810 this time around, otherwise it would have freaking battery timing(that's real deal braker for me )

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 04:18 2

24. JaneChenLong (Posts: 374; Member since: 18 Mar 2015)


You hate TW? You can install other launcher.

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 06:16

41. rubyonrails3 (Posts: 245; Member since: 01 Oct 2014)


I prefer what's OEM provides. though Now I'm using Sense Launcher on My Moto X (2014), I can also use Sense Launcher on Note 4 but then icon. my preference is stock stuff what OEM provides. Hate seem too aggressive, I do not like TW but I love Sense UI.

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 09:18 1

62. singhkaran9830 (unregistered)


Agree on the part that TW is just fine,but acc to me only for S series.The Note series takes complete advantage of TW features,like the multi window and S-Pen.No one can beat these features that Samsung provides with the Note series.

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 04:19 2

25. seven7dust (unregistered)


More gimmicks for gimmick lovers aka pa readers s-fans , lol and they call Apple users sheep , guess spec sheet marketing numbers are more useful than battery life to s-fans.

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 04:31 4

29. neela_akaash (Posts: 1112; Member since: 05 Aug 2014)


Wow. You are right. I think apple makes phones with outstanding battery life.

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 04:33

30. amasog (Posts: 338; Member since: 22 Aug 2013)


"spec sheet marketing numbers are more useful than battery life to s-fans"

because they are gullibles.. fooled easily by gimmicks from a copycat company!

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 04:54 3

34. JaneChenLong (Posts: 374; Member since: 18 Mar 2015)


Samsung battery life is lose only to SONY. But BETTER than iphone.

posted on 09 Apr 2015, 06:20

43. rubyonrails3 (Posts: 245; Member since: 01 Oct 2014)


I doubt that's true in real life, my note 4 don't last longer then M8, and when hotspot on I've to charge twice a day my Note 4. All mobile have different battery life, if you saying samsung, probably you'd be comparing S6 with iPhone 6. both seems to last same amount of time, but if we compare Note 6 to iPhone 6plus iPhone lasts longer. BTW yes sony is really battery champ

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories