Vivo X200 Ultra Review: Impractical design, but an incredible camera

7comments
Vivo X200 Ultra Review: Impractical design, but an incredible camera
The Vivo X200 Ultra is not just any camera phone. Just look at it — there is just no way you can mistake it for anything else! It's got a giant camera bump that sticks out more than ever before, so much so that everyone who picked it up noticed that right away.

What's hiding in that massive bump is Vivo's suggestion for a new take on the smartphone camera system. Instead of compromising with the quality of the ultra-wide camera, why not make it as good as the main camera? And speaking of the main camera, why is it 24mm on most flagships? The way people perceive a picture is never that wide and when taking landscapes, photographers usually resort to wider lenses. So why not use a 35mm lens for the main camera?

All of these decisions result in a unique phone, which now claims the title for the ultimate mobile camera of 2025.

Oh, and one more thing! This Vivo has the best battery life of any phone we have tested in the last two years. Excited?

Well so were we, but because of its slightly weird design, the Vivo X200 Ultra is definitely not a phone for everyone, and Vivo seems to know it — it will, sadly, not be releasing it in Western markets. But it remains an incredibly interesting device, so let's take a closer look.

vivo X200 Ultra
What we like
  • Industry-leading ultra-wide camera
  • Great telephoto camera
  • Innovative 35mm main lens
What we don't like
  • Extremely bulky camera bump
  • Imbalanced weight (top-heavy)
  • Not available globally
7.9
PhoneArena Rating
7.5
Price Class Average
Battery Life
9.6
7.9
Photo Quality
8.1
7.7
Video Quality
6.6
6.6
Charging
8.2
7.3
Performance Heavy
8.5
7.4
Performance Light
8.4
7.8
Display Quality
8
8
Design
7
7.7
Wireless Charging
7
6.9
Biometrics
8
7.7
Audio
6
7.2
Software
6
6.3
Why the score?
This device scores 5.1% better than the average for this price class, which includes devices like the Xiaomi 15 Ultra, vivo X200 Pro and Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
User Score
Be the first to review this phone

The Vivo X200 Ultra excels in areas like camera and charging, but lags a bit in the desing and update departments. What's clear is that it raises the camera bar from the already high one set with the Vivo X200 Pro.

Table of Contents:

Vivo X200 Ultra Specs


Let's start with an overview of the Vivo X200 Ultra specs:


Vivo X200 Ultra Design and Display

Curious fact: the camera bump is thicker than the Galaxy S25 Edge!


The Vivo X200 Ultra is defined by its gigantic camera bump. We are used to camera phones out of China having these supersized camera islands on the back, but this is something else.

We measured that the camera bump itself is actually thicker than the Galaxy S25 Edge! It's something.


Because of that, the whole phone is very top-heavy, which makes it a bit weird to hold and handle. Because of this imbalanced weight, I almost dropped it on a few occasions.

It's also a bit heavier than the Vivo X200 Pro model, nearing 230 grams, but admittedly, the weight is close to that of other big phones, it's the way it's distributed that bothers me more.


For all else, it feels premium and solidly put together. You have flat sides and a mostly flat screen with a very slightly taper.

One stand-out design element is the camera shutter button, placed similarly as the Camera Control on iPhones. And yes, it also has the same touch sensitivity, so you can swipe on it to zoom in and out.



Vivo includes a charging brick, a charging cable, and a case, and we have zero complaints about that. The charger is a super fast 90W at that (keep in mind that it uses proprietary technology, so don't expect to use just any Anker USB-C PD charger to get those speeds).



With a 6.8-inch screen, this is definitely a big canvas, on par with your Galaxy S25 Ultras and Pixel 9 Pro XLs.

Display Measurements:



On our display lab tests, we see a slight improvement in the max brightness, so the X200 Ultra gets a bit brighter than the X200 Pro, but unfortunately the minimum brightness does not get dim enough for comfortable bedtime use and that's something we'd like to see improved.

For biometrics, you get an optical fingerprint reader embedded in the screen that's fast and accurate. We've had no issues with it.

Vivo X200 Ultra Camera

A 35mm main camera is a very controversial decision


vivo X200 Ultra
PhoneArena Camera Score
BEST 158
153
PhoneArena Photo Score
BEST 165
164
Main (wide)
BEST 87
85
Zoom
BEST 29
28
Ultra-wide
BEST 26
26
Selfie
BEST 30
24
PhoneArena Video Score
BEST 155
143
Main (wide)
BEST 83
71
Zoom
BEST 27
26
Ultra-wide
BEST 24
22
Selfie
BEST 28
24


While most modern phones feature a main camera with wide field of view (usually around 23mm to 24mm), the Vivo X200 Ultra goes a completely different route with a 35mm main camera.

35mm is a great focal length for street photography and environmental portraits, but it is not wide enough for landscapes, hence the reason why very few phone makers have actually adopted it.


So... how do you take photos of landscapes on the X200 Ultra? Well, you have a much larger and more capable than usual ultra-wide camera. In fact, the ultra-wide camera sensor is as big as the main one (roughly 1/1.3"). We've never seen another phone with such a powerful ultra-wide lens, so that's definitely unusual. It's a 14mm lens, but with a quick tap, you can also capture 28mm images, which is much closer to that wide perspective you need for landscape shots.

Finally, the third rear camera seems to be the same one as on the X200 Pro, a 200MP camera with a 3.7X zoom and f/2.7 aperture. Plus, it can focus really close, allowing for some truly astounding macro shots.

Main Camera




The first thing you have to decide on before starting to take pictures with any Vivo phone is the color mode. The phone defaults to Vivo's Vivid mode, which is what we've also used for the sample photos below. 

Recommended Stories
However, colors with this mode are vivid indeed (we are talkign much more vivide than a Galaxy!) and if you want more realistic colors, you should definitely take photos in the Zeiss color mode.

Zoom Quality




With a 3.7X telephoto camera (85mm in case you get lost in the numbers), the zoom quality on the X200 Ultra has not changed much from the Vivo X200 Pro. Some may be disappointed by the lack of new hardware, but let us remind you that the X200 Pro had one of the most powerful zoom cameras we've ever tested, and we have the same quality with the Ultra.

In other words, this is still absolutely a top-notch zoom camera.

Portrait Mode



One place where we don't miss a 24mm perspective is for portraits. Many would argue that actually 35mm is the perfect focal lengths for environmental portraits. You then also have a 2.2x mode, 3.7x and 5.9x, and all of those are very useful for portraiture. My favorite lens is the 3.7X (85mm) one, which gives you a nearly 3D effect when you walk further back from your subject.

And indeed, the quality we get is great and the perspective feels right. Look closer and you would notice that the software is able to pick up individual strands of hair and separate them from the background with great precision.

One word of warning: notice the aggressively saturated colors from the Vivid color profile in the above images. We really wish we took those portraits using the neutral Zeiss color mode.

Vivo has its usual bokeh simulations too, which are fun (you can pick between various bokeh ball shapes).

Ultra-Wide Camera


14mm mode




At its widest 14mm mode, the ultra-wide camera captures excellent photos with little distortion and an excellent amount of detail. This is indeed one of the best ultra-wide cameras we have tested so far.

During the day, the advantage is noticeable, but you really notice its big advantage in low light when its able to capture a lot more light than competitors.

28mm mode



We had our doubts about using sensor crop for most of our photos (to match the perspective of a traditional smartphone main camera), but when we actually looked at the photos, the quality is really hard to distinguish from a native lens.

Detail is excellent, there are no changes to the color science and especially during daytime you won't encounter a drop in quality.

Front Camera



Selfies also look nice on the Vivo, with a good amount of detail and pleasing skin tones.

Video Quality


While Vivo mostly manages to go around the 35mm conundrum with a crop from the ultra-wide camera, this is not the case for video.

And you can easily see that in the footage. We bet most folks would still need that wider perspective for most of their videos and 35mm would usually be a bit too zoomed in.

That's why most videos recorded on the X200 Ultra will use the ultra-wide camera and if you try to match the standard 24mm perspective on the X200 Ultra, your footage ends up looking very noisy and details drops quite a bit. Switching to the main 35mm lens fixes that, but then your perpsective is too tight.

Overall, I think video recording is the biggest issue we encounter when faced with the 35mm lens question, and Vivo does not convince us it has any good solutions for that.

Vivo X200 Ultra Performance & Benchmarks



While the X200 Pro launched with a MediaTek chipset, the X200 Ultra switches to the flagship Snapdragon 8 Ultra.

Our unit also has 16GB of RAM, which definitely helps with multitasking and AI future-proofing the phone.

CPU Performance Benchmarks:


Geekbench 6
SingleHigher is better
vivo X200 Ultra3107
vivo X200 Pro2803
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra3137
Xiaomi 15 Ultra2962
Geekbench 6
MultiHigher is better
vivo X200 Ultra9419
vivo X200 Pro8218
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra9769
Xiaomi 15 Ultra8965


No surprises in the CPU performance tests — the X200 Ultra performs on par with other flagship Android phones like the Galaxy S25 Ultra.

GPU Performance


3DMark Extreme(High)Higher is better
vivo X200 Ultra6772
vivo X200 Pro6187
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra6208
Xiaomi 15 Ultra5826
3DMark
Extreme(Low)Higher is better
vivo X200 Ultra3351
vivo X200 Pro2790
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra2981
Xiaomi 15 Ultra4771

The GPU scores, however, are interesting. We see that the X200 Ultra handles itslef better under stress as its performance after 20 minutes of heavy-duty gaming is nearly 10% better than the Galaxy S25 Ultra.

However, if you truly want a gaming phone, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra delivers much higher results.

Vivo X200 Ultra Software




The Vivo X200 Ultra runs on Origin OS which is a very interesting take on Android and it has lots of cool additions that you don't have on stock Android.

We would say that it's among our favorite Android skins. For example, it's nice how you can drag and drop files and images to a separate vault and then easily drop them as an email attachment, or quickly share them with someone.

In terms of software support, we expect four years of OS upgrades and a few more years of security updates, which is a standard among Chinese phone makers, but not as good as the seven years of OS upgrades you get from Samsung and Google.

Vivo X200 Ultra Battery

Best battery life of 2025, simple as that

vivo X200 Ultra
( 6000 mAh )
vivo X200 Ultra
Battery Life Estimate
9h 37m
Ranks #2 for phones tested in the past 2 years
Average is 7h 4m
Browsing
22h
Average is 16h 23m
Video
13h 41m
Average is 10h 8m
Gaming
14h 19m
Average is 10h 10m
Charging speed
90W
Charger
64%
30 min
0h 47m
Full charge
Ranks #35 for phones released in the past 2 years
Wireless Charging
30W
Charger
N/A
30 min
N/A
Full charge
Find out more details about battery and charging for all phones we have tested on our PhoneArena Battery Score page


With a 6,000 mAh silicon-carbon battery and careful system-wide optimizations, the X200 Ultra surpasses expectations and shows mainstream phones that you can innovate here as well.

PhoneArena Battery Test Results:


Battery Life
Charging
Phone Battery Life
estimate
Browsing Video Gaming
vivo X200 Ultra
6000 mAh
9h 37min 22h 0min 13h 41min 14h 19min
vivo X200 Pro
6000 mAh
9h 11min 21h 19min 14h 4min 10h 38min
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
5000 mAh
8h 0min 20h 49min 8h 54min 14h 21min
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
6000 mAh
7h 33min 16h 39min 10h 11min 13h 29min
Phone Full Charging 30 min Charge
Wired Wireless Wired Wireless
vivo X200 Ultra
6000 mAh
0h 47min Untested 64% Untested
vivo X200 Pro
6000 mAh
0h 53min Untested 61% Untested
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
5000 mAh
1h 9min 1h 58min 68% 33%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
6000 mAh
1h 3min Untested 58% Untested
Find out more details about battery and charging for all phones we have tested on our PhoneArena Battery Score page

On our lightest web browsing test the X200 Ultra scores exactly 22 hours, beating most rivals except for the iPhone 16 Pro Max, which lasted some 40 minutes longer.

But then for YouTube video streaming, the Vivo X200 Ultra lasts an insane 13 hours and 41 minutes. The already excellent iPhone 16 Pro Max scores "merely" 10 hours and a half on the same test and the Galaxy S25 Ultra lasts for less than 9 hours. The Vivo gets nearly 50% longer battery life than the Galaxy!



You also have wireless charging support with 30W speeds, but you need to use a proprietary Vivo charger to get the full speed.

Vivo X200 Ultra Audio Quality and Haptics


You get very good audio quality via the loudspeakers on the X200 Ultra. They get quite loud and you get some depth to lows, which is always appreciated on a smartphone.

As for haptics, they are also very good with a nice, tight feedback, so no complaints on that either.

Should you buy it?



Well, you cannot buy the Vivo in most Western markets, so the question is not really relevant here. But the Vivo X200 Ultra is clearly an incredible camera phone.

The clever idea of a 35mm main lens and a much better ultra-wide camera brings lots of benefits and results in fantastic images.

However, that gigantic camera bump is not only an eye sore — it's a serious design flaw and one that many people won't be able to forgive. As for my personal conclusion, well, this will not become my daily driver for long, but I'm taking this phone on my next trip to Italy. It's a really exciting camera and would make for a great second phone, if you have that luxury.

Loading Comments...

Recommended Stories

FCC OKs Cingular\'s purchase of AT&T Wireless