iPhone 17 Pro vs Galaxy S25: Are Apple’s $300 extras really worth It?

Power versus practicality. Here’s what separates the iPhone 17 Pro from the Galaxy S25.

2comments
We may earn a commission if you make a purchase from the links on this page.
Person holding an orange iPhone 17 Pro next to a gray Samsung Galaxy S25.

Apple’s iPhone 17 Pro has landed with an all-48 MP camera system including a new 4x tetraprism telephoto camera, brighter 3,000-nit display with anti-reflection coating, and faster 40W charging, all for $1099. Samsung’s Galaxy S25 comes at a lower price of $799 with a feather-light body, Snapdragon 8 Elite, and a familiar triple-camera setup.

But does the S25 offer a better bang for your buck than the iPhone 17 Pro? After all, it has a lot going for it: it offers excellent day-to-day speed, a bright 6.2-inch 120Hz display, and one of the most compact, lightweight designs you can buy at this price.

To find out, we put both phones through our in-house tests for battery life, camera quality, display performance, and raw speed. Beyond the numbers, we also lived with these devices to see how they behave off the benchmark track. Here’s what we learned and which one we think fits different kinds of buyers best.

iPhone 17 Pro: $0.00/mo. at Verizon

$0 /mo
$30 55
$31 off (100%)
The powerful iPhone 17 Pro is finally here! You can now get the new Pro with an upgraded design and a brilliant display for as low as $0.00/mo. at Verizon. You must set up a new line on an Unlimited Ultimate plan and trade in a device to take advantage.
Buy at Verizon

iPhone 17 Pro Max: $2.77/mo. at Verizon

$2 77 /mo
$33 33
$31 off (92%)
The impressive iPhone 17 Pro Max is available at Verizon. Right now, you can save up to $1,100 on the premium device when you activate a new line and trade in an eligible device. The promo is only available with an Unlimited Ultimate plan.
Buy at Verizon

Samsung Galaxy S25

6.2-inch
Triple camera
4000 mAh
12GB
$449 at Amazon

iPhone 17 Pro vs Galaxy S25 differences:


7.9
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
7.4
Samsung Galaxy S25
6.7
8
7.1
6
8.3
8.7
8.5
8
8
8
8
10
Battery Life
Photo Quality
Video Quality
Charging
Performance Heavy
Performance Light
Display Quality
Design
Wireless Charging
Biometrics
Audio
Software
7.1
7.2
6.6
6.1
7.8
8.4
8
7
6.3
8
7
8

Table of Contents:

Read more:

Design and Size

Samsung keeps the compact crown, Apple experiments with durability


Samsung's Galaxy S25 continues to be one of the most compact flagships on the market. It's 7.25 mm thick and weighs only 162 grams. It’s one of the lightest premium phones you can buy today.

Apple’s iPhone 17 Pro, on the other hand, ditches titanium in favor of a forged aluminum unibody with Ceramic Shield 2 on both the front and back. Apple claims that Ceramic Shield 2 is three times more scratch-resistant than before. While this design improves durability, it also makes the Pro thicker at 8.3 mm and heavier at 194 grams. Oh, and there's that new "camera plateau" that is… maybe not the prettiest look.



The Galaxy S25 colors include Mint, Icy Blue, Navy, and Silver Shadow. Apple has experimented a bit with the iPhone 17 colors this year, adding a Cosmic Orange this year, alongside a Silver and Deep Blue options (yes, there is no black iPhone Pro this year).


Apple finally raises the bar when it comes to display brightness. The iPhone 17 Pro’s 6.3-inch OLED display now hits up to 3,000 nits outdoors, making it the brightest iPhone screen yet, and a small step ahead of the Galaxy S25’s 2,600 nits peak. Both panels have a 1-120Hz.

Samsung comes with a slightly smaller 6.2-inch screen, which also looks excellent. For biometrics, Apple relies on Face ID inside the Dynamic Island, while Samsung pairs an ultrasonic fingerprint scanner with basic Face Unlock.

The iPhone 17 series also introduces a new seven-layer anti-reflective coating. It’s not as effective as the Galaxy S25 Ultra’s treatment, but side-by-side comparisons with the iPhone 16  make the improvement clear.

Display Measurements:



In our lab, the iPhone’s 20% APL brightness measured higher, while the Galaxy reached stronger full-screen (100% APL) brightness; both dim impressively low for nighttime use, though. Color accuracy is better on the iPhone, while the gamma on the Galaxy is flatter and a touch cooler by default.

The main biometrics are different between the two phones. The iPhone uses Face ID, while the S25 FE uses an excellent ultrasonic fingerprint reader (plus basic face unlock). Both are quick and accurate, but Face ID allows you to unlock your phone without touching it, which can come in handy.

Performance and Software

Snapdragon vs A19 Pro: the clash of a new generation


The iPhone 17 Pro debuts Apple’s new A19 Pro chip, built on TSMC’s 3nm N3P process. Apple finally introduces a vapor chamber cooling system, which should help sustain peak performance for longer.

Samsung uses Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Elite (for Galaxy), which is also a 3nm chip. It delivers blazing-fast performance, especially in graphics-heavy tasks, and it is paired with 12 GB of RAM.

Storage-wise, the iPhone starts at 256 GB and tops at 1 TB, whereas the S25 starts at 128 GB and tops at 512 GB.


Recommended Stories

On the software side, the Galaxy S25 leans heavily into Galaxy AI, powered by Google’s Gemini. Features like Circle to Search, Live Translate, and Note Assist are deeply integrated into One UI 7.

Apple’s iOS 26 introduced the new Liquid Glass design and features like Live Translate for calls, Call Screening, and Smart Replies. But Apple Intelligence is still rolling out, and Siri’s major overhaul is delayed until 2026 or later.

CPU Performance Benchmarks:


Geekbench 6
SingleHigher is better
Apple iPhone 17 Pro3668
Samsung Galaxy S253031
Geekbench 6
MultiHigher is better
Apple iPhone 17 Pro9498
Samsung Galaxy S259626


In Geekbench 6 single-core, the A19 Pro pulls clearly ahead of Snapdragon 8 Elite. In multi-core, the roles are reversed, with the Snapdragon coming on top in heavy multi-threaded tasks.

GPU Performance:


3DMark Extreme(High)Higher is better
Apple iPhone 17 Pro5914
Samsung Galaxy S255959
3DMark Extreme(Low)Higher is better
Apple iPhone 17 Pro3506
Samsung Galaxy S252500

Peak scores are essentially a the same, with a tiny edge to Galaxy, but the iPhone’s vapor chamber and aluminum shell keep performance steadier over time. In long sessions, Apple’s sustained score remains much higher, so big games hold framerates more consistently on the 17 Pro, while the S25 drops off harder once heat builds up.

Camera

Apple finally upgrades the telephoto camera


The Galaxy S25 relies on a familiar triple-camera setup that carries over from the S24: a 50 MP main, a 12 MP ultrawide, and a 10 MP 3x telephoto. You also get software features like Expert RAW, Log video, Audio Eraser, and strong AI-driven processing to elevate results. However, the hardware hasn’t seen meaningful changes in a while, which makes the system feel a bit outdated.

With the iPhone 17 Pro, for the first time, the Pro models adopt an all-48 MP triple-camera system. Both the main and ultrawide cameras have been updated with new pipelines to capture finer detail and better dynamic range across lighting conditions.

The brand-new 48 MP telephoto comes with a tetraprism telephoto lens that supports 4x optical zoom at 100 mm and a much longer 8x zoom at 200 mm, with improved stabilization on a larger sensor. For photos, digital zoom now extends up to 40x, pushing the iPhone Pro series into territory previously dominated by Samsung’s Ultra series.

On the front, Apple has upgraded the selfie camera to 18 MP, giving users higher resolution, a wider field of view, and more flexible framing options. It also comes with optical image stabilization, which should come in handy when recording vlog-style videos.

Apple has also brought Dual Capture video to the Pro models, letting you record simultaneously with the front and rear cameras. That's something Galaxy phones have been capable of for a while now.

Keep in mind that Dual Capture video is recorded as one file, so you cannot remove the front camera feed after the recording is done.

PhoneArena Camera Score:


Photo
Video
Phone Camera
Score
Photo
Score
Main
(wide)
Ultra
Wide
Selfie Zoom
Apple iPhone 17 Pro 156 162 84 24 28 26
Samsung Galaxy S25 147 151 80 21 27 23
Phone Camera
Score
Video
Score
Main
(wide)
Ultra
Wide
Selfie Zoom
Apple iPhone 17 Pro 156 150 77 23 26 24
Samsung Galaxy S25 147 142 74 21 26 21
Find out more details about photo and video scores for all phones we have tested on our PhoneArena Camera Score page

The iPhone 17 Pro scored higher in our controlled camera tests, particularly when it came to the telephoto and main camera. The S25 keeps things competitive for casual snaps and social media, but if you plan on extensively using the cameras, the iPhone 17 Pro is the better tool for the job.

Main Camera




The iPhone 17 Pro clearly had some issues with exposing for this cloudy day here. The shadows are darker then they should be, which makes for a much less pleasing image compared to that of the S25. Colors and detail look good on both.

Zoom Quality




The same trends we say with the main image sensors continue with the telephoto cameras. The difference here is that the iPhone has a 4x optical zoom (and 8x optical quality zoom), while the S25 has a 3x zoom. The iPhone's image has higher detail, but the way the phone has handled the scene is not ideal.



I much prefer the colors from the S25 here. They are more natural, whereas the iPhone has thrown in a greenish tint to the whole image.

Ultra-wide Camera




Just like when we compared the main cameras, the S25 has exposed the scene better with its ultrawide. That said, the iPhone's image is more detailed and sharper.

Selfies




Both selfie cameras do a great job, but the new one on the iPhone 17 Pro has a wider field of view, which would come in handy for group shots.

Battery Life and Charging

Apple's biggest jump in battery capacity


The Galaxy S25 comes with a 4,000 mAh battery and 25W wired and 15W wireless charging. Apple doesn't disclose the iPhone's battery size, but we expect it to be somewhere around ~3,900 mAh for the nano-SIM version, and ~4,200 mAh for the eSIM one. Wired charging on the iPhone has increased to 40W wired, while wireless remains at 25W with Qi2.2 support.

One small detail is that the S25 has 4.5W reverse wireless charging, while the iPhone 17 Pro can only charge other device via cable.

PhoneArena Battery and Charging Test Results:


Battery Life
Charging
Phone Battery Life
estimate
Browsing Video Gaming
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
4252 mAh
6h 42min 17h 6min 8h 25min 10h 8min
Samsung Galaxy S25
4000 mAh
7h 6min 18h 29min 8h 1min 12h 20min
Phone Full Charging 30 min Charge
Wired Wireless Wired Wireless
Apple iPhone 17 Pro
4252 mAh
1h 16min Untested 67% Untested
Samsung Galaxy S25
4000 mAh
1h 22min 1h 37min 54% 32%
Find out more details about battery and charging for all phones we have tested on our PhoneArena Battery Score page

Despite its slightly larger battery, the iPhone 17 Pro got 20 minutes less of estimated battery compared to the Galaxy S25 life in our tests. The difference came mainly from our Browsing and Gaming tests, where the S25 lasted 1-2h more.

Both phones get a full charge in under 1h and 20min, but the iPhone reached 67% in 30 minutes, whereas the S25 reached 54%.

Audio Quality and Haptics


Both are good pretty good. The iPhone 17 Pro’s speakers are cleaner at higher volumes with a bit more mid-bass weight, while the S25 sounds a bit leaner. Both get loud, although we noticed that the iPhone 17 Pro's max volume is not as high as its predecessor.

Haptics are tight and precise on both phones. For calls and mics, Apple’s new four-mic “studio” setup on the Pro line captures clearer voice in noisy spots, while Samsung’s Audio Eraser can come in handy when recording video.

Specs Comparison


Here's a quick overview of the iPhone 17 Pro vs Galaxy S25 specs:



Which one should you buy?



Pick the iPhone 17 Pro if you want the best camera system under $1,200 that’s equally serious about photos and pro-grade video, steadier gaming performance over long sessions, brighter small-window HDR with lower reflectance, faster wired charging, and a tougher build that’s designed to shed heat. Creators, mobile gamers, and anyone who edits or shoots a lot will feel where the money goes.

Pick the Galaxy S25 if you want the lightest true flagship you can pocket today, prefer a smaller 6.2-inch footprint, love Samsung’s deep AI features and Gemini integration, value longer gaming battery life, and want reverse wireless charging. It’s also the budget-smarter option at $799; for many people, it delivers 90% of what they need for 70% of the price.

Google News Follow
Follow us on Google News
COMMENTS (2)

Latest Discussions

by MagentaMarx • 3
by TuGa121 • 1

Recommended Stories

FCC OKs Cingular\'s purchase of AT&T Wireless