LG K10 User Reviews Back

Overall user rating

4.0

The overall rating is the average of all user reviews, while the overall alternatives are the ones that has been listed most.

UI speed
3.0
Camera
2.7
Multimedia
4.7
Internet
4.3
Call quality
4.0
Battery
3.0
Reception
4.3
Display
4.7
Build quality
6.0
Text input
4.3
Everyday usage
4.0
Post new review

Please note that each user review reflects the opinion of its respectful author and not of PhoneArena.

ChillaxedLatino posted on Jun 06, 2020, 6:44 PM
Posts: 0; Member since: Jun 06, 2020

4.0

Pretty Embarassing for a Budget Phone like LG K10

ChillaxedLatino has owned it for more than one year before publishing this review

LG K10 is a joke in terms of low-end specs and the fastest battery life drain I have ever seen on a smartphone. What's worse is that after two years of using it, the performance gets incredibly worse as it gets hotter after one hour of use. The phone looks pretty on the outside, but on the inside, however, not so much.

Build quality
4.0
Feels flimsy and forgettable.
Reception
3.0
Jumps all over the place.
Call quality
3.0
Its okay I guess.
Internet
6.0
About the same exact web app performance like every smartphone I used.
Multimedia
6.0
Nothing to complain about that one.
Camera
5.0
Camera with flashlight is rather decent.
UI speed
3.0
It's awful after installing updates.
Everyday usage
4.0
It gets deteriorating after a while.
Text input
6.0
Pretty easy.
Display
7.0
The design display is pretty good to look at.
Battery
2.0
Awful battery life after a long time using it.

Pros

  • The design presentation

Cons

  • Bad specs and terrible performance after a year of use.

Is this review helpful?

Report

Vaporizz posted on Jun 19, 2017, 8:57 AM
Posts: 0; Member since: Jun 19, 2017

6.0

Decent Phone, Poor Camera

Vaporizz has owned it for more than one year before publishing this review

I got the K10 about a year ago, It has been a pretty solid phone, besides for the fact the camera is garbage... I have friends with iPhones with half the mega pixels that take much better photos.. Not sure why this occurs

Build quality
8.0
Reception
8.0
Call quality
8.0
Internet
6.0
Multimedia
6.0
Camera
2.0
UI speed
5.0
Everyday usage
5.0
Text input
4.0
Display
5.0
Battery
6.0

Pros

  • Sturdy Design

Cons

  • Bad Camera
  • Small Storage

3 out of 4 people found this review helpful.

Report

three3nine posted on Jun 27, 2018, 12:50 PM

2.0

Junk

three3nine has owned it for more than one year before publishing this review

Didn't really have any expectations for this phone because it was almost free but it still was/is disappointing.

It locks up, shuts off at times, takes terrible pictures and is SLOW, SLOW, SLOW. The WiFi is terrible and the phone eats battery like there's no tomorrow.

Again, these phones are cheap but they're also junk. You can spend a little more, get an older phone, and have a better (and more reliable) piece of technology.

I guess it's better than no phone at all but it's a close race. There have been numerous times where I literally considered throwing the phone out my car window while driving down the freeway because it angered me so badly. They really aren't good phones. You can do so much better.

Build quality
6.0
Reception
2.0
Call quality
1.0
Internet
1.0
Multimedia
2.0
Camera
1.0
UI speed
1.0
Everyday usage
3.0
Text input
3.0
Display
2.0
Battery
1.0

Pros

  • Fairly Decent Physical Build

Cons

  • Battery Life
  • Call Quality
  • WiFi
  • Camera
  • Not Enough Memory
  • Display Brightness

0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

Report
You must be a registered user to post a user review
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.
FCC OKs Cingular's purchase of AT&T Wireless