Judge fines Apple for not including power brick in iPhone box

Apple was trying to groom iPhone users into understanding that they were no longer going to receive a power brick with the purchase of their expensive new handset. Apple knew that it wouldn't be taking a risk because it anticipated that other manufacturers would soon follow along.

Sure enough, after making fun of Apple for removing the charger and its earbuds from iPhone boxes, Samsung deleted its comments on social media that knocked Apple and also removed the power brick from the boxes containing some of its higher-priced handsets. Samsung also did the same thing when Apple eliminated the 3.5mm earphone jack from the iPhone 7 line.

At first, Samsung criticized Apple for getting rid of the 3.5mm jack until it removed the jack on the Galaxy Note 10. These days, it is more surprising to find a handset that comes with a 3.5mm port and ships with a power brick.

Apple tried to cloak its decision to stop shipping power adapters in a green flag stating that eliminating the brick would allow it to ship the iPhone in smaller boxes that would allow 70% more devices to fit on a shipping pallet. This would reduce yearly carbon emissions by 2 million metric tons, equivalent to taking 500,000 cars off the road.

There are those who do agree that Apple was being green by eliminating the charging brick and the EarPods from iPhone boxes; that is if you mean green as in the color of money. Earlier this year a report stated that Apple saved $6.5 billion by shipping boxes without any accessories.

Today, some interesting news came out of Brazil where a judge ruled that Apple must pay a customer who recently purchased a new iPhone close to the equivalent of $1,081. There was no charger in the customer's box which violates consumer law in the country. 

Tecmundo (via MacRumors) reported that Article 39 of the Consumer Code (CDC) in Brazil prevents what is known as a "tie sale." As a result, Apple cannot sell an iPhone and the charger, used to power up the phone's batteries, in separate transactions. Therefore, Apple is being sentenced after selling an iPhone and the related charger separately to the same consumer in the city of Goiânia.

According to the ruling announced by Judge Vanderlei Caires Pinheiro of the 6th Civil Court of Goiânia, Apple must compensate the consumer by paying him 5 thousand real for carrying out the "tie sale" of the company's devices. Brazilian consumer group Procon-SP tried to get the country to force Apple to include a charger in each iPhone box by stating that the charger is an "essential part" of using a smartphone.

Procon-SP also said that by not including the charger in the iPhone box, Apple was violating the Brazilian Consumer Defense Code, an argument that Apple countered by saying that many already have older power adapters in their homes allowing Apple to help make the environment greener by not shipping new ones alongside a newly purchased iPhone.