The Android powered BlackBerry Priv is now available from T-Mobile

The Android powered BlackBerry Priv is now available from T-Mobile
If you're a T-Mobile customer who has been waiting for the BlackBerry Priv to land on the nation's third largest carrier, today is the day you've been looking forward to. The first Android powered BlackBerry is now available from T-Mobile's retail locations and online store. Qualifying customers can purchase the phone for $0 down, paying off the balance at the rate of $30 each month for 24 months. That works out to $719.99 (you get a penny back in change).

If you don't mind leasing the slider, you can turn to T-Mobile's JUMP! On Demand. With that program, you can pay $0 down (which is always the best part), and pay $34 for 18 months ($612). With this plan, you are entitled to trade-in your phone and exchange it for a hot new model up to three times a year. At anytime, you can purchase the device by paying off the remaining installment balance and "residual purchase amount."

If you are thinking about biting the bullet and paying the full retail price, you can actually save $20 by buying the unlocked version directly from BlackBerry. This model does support the T-Mobile pipeline. If you are interested in purchasing or leasing the device, click on the appropriate sourcelink. The BlackBerry Priv is available in your favorite color, assuming that your favorite color is black.

AT&T had an exclusive on the carrier-branded version of the phone in the U.S., which expired on January 20th. Both Verizon and Sprint will also be adding the slider to their equipment lineup in the not too distant future.


source: T-Mobile, BlackBerry via Crackberry

Related phones

Priv
  • Display 5.4" 1440 x 2560 pixels
  • Camera 18 MP / 2 MP front
  • Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 808, Hexa-core, 1800 MHz
  • Storage 32 GB + microSDXC
  • Battery 3410 mAh

FEATURED VIDEO

32 Comments

1. eman99

Posts: 410; Member since: Aug 03, 2010

And this is why we the consumers dumped 2 year contracts to pay this much for phones? Makes no sense 2 year contract with this phone 200 to 300 dollars years ago no sense why we are paying this much

6. TerryTerius unregistered

Because with smart phone sales volume falling, the only real way to counterbalance that is to make every unit more expensive. Basic economics.

21. WakaFlakaD

Posts: 576; Member since: Apr 30, 2011

Sure, it is 200 or 300, but you end up paying more through your monthly bill throughout the year and lock into a 2-year contract lol

2. DirtyDan23

Posts: 280; Member since: Aug 12, 2014

I can't believe people still fall for the Blackberry meme.

3. Bernoulli

Posts: 4360; Member since: Sep 01, 2012

Better than Samsung and of course anything is better than apple.

4. donfem

Posts: 708; Member since: Mar 30, 2011

I can't believe there are people out there who think they know it all and would tell others what to like.

5. xq10xa

Posts: 810; Member since: Dec 07, 2010

The Priv seems pretty cool. Overpriced for sure...but if you really like the phone then you will get it. I don't think many people actually will buy this phone though....just too much better competition.

10. Mxyzptlk unregistered

It looks cool but I don't think it's versatile enough to be worth that much money. You're better off getting the Nexus 6P or the Moto X Pure Edition

7. Rafishant

Posts: 396; Member since: Oct 13, 2015

That is why BlackBerry market share is falling day by day, and now it is close to ZERO. BlackBerry managed to sell merely 700K units last quarter. Even some unknown Chinese OEMs are now selling more than this. John Chen should've developed and focused on BB10 (their unique element). He just killed the handset division by abandoning BB10 and jumping to Android. Android didn't save many larger companies, so it would never do anything good to BlackBerry, when they only sell just thousands units of the Priv. Take a look at today's LG financial report!.

12. meanestgenius

Posts: 22049; Member since: May 28, 2014

Their market share is so low because no one was buying BB10 powered handsets due to the perceived app gap. Had BlackBerry continued down the "BB10 only" route, the handset division would most assuredly go away. With this, at least they have a chance at increasing handset sales and perhaps creating new BB10 handsets later down the line. I agree that Android isn't always the answer. That's clearly evident by Android stalwarts now struggling in the smartphone space. But BlackBerry had to do something. Next quarter will give us a more accurate picture of well the Priv is selling. And for the record, the 700,000 units was mostly BB10 flavored devices. The Priv had a limited release last quarter.

11. meanestgenius

Posts: 22049; Member since: May 28, 2014

Nice to see the Priv finally released in T-Mobile. Definitely would have picked it up from them had they released it sooner. But buying it unlocked, where I can take it to any GSM carrier I choose, has its advantages.

13. Crispin_Gatieza

Posts: 3137; Member since: Jan 23, 2014

Got mine today! Had to go to 3 stores before I found one that had them in stock. They're selling. In fact, 2 of the stores have deliveries scheduled for tomorrow because of demand. Miami's always been a BB town. About the only thing it's good for, and a basketball team.

15. Big_D5

Posts: 40; Member since: Jun 13, 2014

I got mine today at lunch.

17. Zeeya

Posts: 331; Member since: Mar 17, 2013

I love BlackBerry... but my next phone will be an iPhone 7. I just need specific apps which I just can't find on BlackBerry. But don't get me wrong, BlackBerry 10 is really awesome.

18. meanestgenius

Posts: 22049; Member since: May 28, 2014

What apps couldn't you find on a BlackBerry Priv that you need? Unless you don't like Android.

22. VZWEMP

Posts: 158; Member since: Dec 11, 2008

when did they mention owning Priv? They clearly stated BB10 in the last sentence.

23. Mxyzptlk unregistered

#selective reading

26. meanestgenius

Posts: 22049; Member since: May 28, 2014

Get off my sack, you #selectiveidiot.

27. Mxyzptlk unregistered

No one wants to hear about your f-ing sack. Get over it and stop whining.

28. meanestgenius

Posts: 22049; Member since: May 28, 2014

YOU want to hear about my f-ing sack, that's why you're always on it. You'll note, you took the shot at me first to get my attention. Now grow the f-up and stop seeking my attention, you insignificant little troll.

29. Mxyzptlk unregistered

I'll note what? That doesn't even make sense. Get over it, this is an open forum like you said. Stop getting your panties in a twist just because you got called out. And stop fantasizing me being on your sack you insignificant little twit.

30. meanestgenius

Posts: 22049; Member since: May 28, 2014

Of course it doesn't make sense to an idiot like you. You keep on saying "get over it", but you clearly can't get over the fact that you're on my sack. And you didn't "call me out". You took the cowardly route, as usual, and responded to someone else's post instead of responding to me directly. And YOU'RE the one getting your stained tighty whities in a bunch because I called YOU out for your tomfoolery. Be a man next time and respond to me, you cowardly little brat. And if you'd hop OFF my sack, I wouldn't have to constantly remark about how much you're on it.

31. Mxyzptlk unregistered

I am responding to you, you nut. The way I responded first was no different from how you normally do it. The only one who's staining their white panties is you and you're being your usual ignorant self. So don't tell me to be a man when you continue to fail being a man day in and day out. Oh wait, I forgot that you're Princess. Maybe you should worry about growing a sack first before having your sick fantasies about me hopping on something that doesn't exist.

32. meanestgenius

Posts: 22049; Member since: May 28, 2014

You're responding to me NOW. You didn't in your post #23, but I responded to YOUR post, since YOU were not man enough to respond to me, initially. Still a coward, Michelle. I understand stand that you're an idiot, but try and stay with me here. And I find it hilarious that a little boy that's into little boys would attempt to question my manhood. Especially when you're the one that constantly seeks my attention. I've told you no (emphatically) plenty of times, so take your man-crush elsewhere. And you keep saying that I don't have a sack, have sick fantasies, etc, but here you are, STILL on my sack that you claim that I don't have, and now you're even talking about it. Get it through your thick skull Michelle, and hop of my sack, already.

33. Mxyzptlk unregistered

Just like you don't respond to me every time you say "Lol got'em" to some comment responding to me. You're a big hypocrite. I am responding to you right now. What part of that are you having trouble understanding? I don't have to question your manhood. Your continuous comments about being on your fictional sack are what's making me question your manhood, or in this case, your lack of a manhood. Princess, you're pathetic. Unfortunately I drove myself down to your level with your continuous sack comments. Get over it, no one wants to hear about your sack. It's not my fault the ladies aren't interested in you or you're just too scared to step into the ballpark.

34. meanestgenius

Posts: 22049; Member since: May 28, 2014

What part of "you're a coward and you didn't respond to first" don't you understand? Oh wait, you're an idiot, so you probably don't understand anything I'm saying. And you're calling me a hypocrite, and yet you do the same "lol, got 'em" to some comment responding to me as well. Go ahead and say that you don't so I can once again out you as the lying hypocrite that you are. And you CAN'T question my manhood, considering that you're all on my "manhood", especially as of late. You could never be driven down to my level, because you're beneath me. And not only do you want to hear about my sack, you want to be all on it, as evident by the way you seek out my attention nonstop. And considering that I've had more ladies than you have pairs of stained tighty whities, the last part of your comment is invalid.

35. Mxyzptlk unregistered

Yup you're done here, Princess. I think you're buried now. Take your lumps like a man. Oh wait I forgot, Princess. It's sad, you're so lonely that you're having sick fantasies of me on your nonexistent sack. It's ok Meanest, there's a fish in the sea for everyone, even for you besides Chen.

36. meanestgenius

Posts: 22049; Member since: May 28, 2014

You just refuse to hop off my sack. I could understand if you were some hot chick, but you're some ugly dude that likes to cross dress and call himself Michelle, so you're definitely NOT my type. It's a shame that you have no life and dwell in mommy and daddy's basement, dancing in the mirror as you tuck in your infantessimal man parts singing "Goodbye horses" and sowing little dresses that you know won't fit your sloppy, misshapen body, destined to be alone. I CLEARLY bodied you with that last part of my comment. There is absolutely no coming back from that for you. Any further comment from you will just be an act of desperation on your part, and you'll just be directed to see this comment, #36. Prove me right like I know you will.

37. BobbyDigital

Posts: 2125; Member since: May 29, 2014

ROTFLMAO!! Got 'em!

38. meanestgenius

Posts: 22049; Member since: May 28, 2014

Lmao! I certainly did! He's done with that one. There is no coming back for him on this thread from that, even though he's gonna try. But he'll definitely be unsuccessful.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.