Motorola Shamu aka Nexus 6 full specs leak: 5.2" QHD screen, Snapdragon 805 and Android L
posted by Daniel P. / Aug 13, 2014, 6:19 AM
"Funny story" - that's how the saga about the Motorola Shamu GFXBench database leaks should begin. The handset is pegged to be an upcoming Google Nexus 6 candidate, but judging from today's revelation, it might also be one of the most potent flagships around when it lands, which is not exactly in sync with the usual Nexus line traditions. Yesterday, we posted the Shamu appearing in the offscreen Manhattan test database, flaunting scores commensurate with a Snapdragon 801 chipset, paired with a 1080p display.
LG G3's QHD resolution. Still, the phone, named after a killer whale, keeps graphics scores close to those of handsets with 1080p displays, while the G3 with Snapdragon 801 and Quad HD panel scores much lower. Furthermore, the Korea-exclusive LG G3 Cat. 6 that sports a Snapdragon 805 processor, also scored lower than the Shamu, despite that it matches the high-res panel with an Adreno 420 GPU. Still, these are just preliminary test results, and both the onscreen and offscreen scores of the Shamu seem to match, so the test obviously isn't accounting for the display resolution here yet. In fact, we don't even need to guess what kind of a more potent processor will land in the Motorola Shamu, as in the meantime the specs info entries got fully populated in the GFXBench database, and you can see them in the slideshow below.After reviewing the onscreen test rankings, however, it was discovered that the Motorola Shamu is listed as having a 2392x1440 pixels display, which, if we discount the eventual soft keys strip space, works out to a display with the
They show that a quad-core Snapdragon 805 will be running the show, clocked at the hearty 2.6 GHz. The Quad HD 1440p resolution got confirmed in the table, and we even get to know the screen size now - a 5.2" diagonal, which is, thankfully, a far cry from the 5.9" size bandied about before. We also get 3 GB of RAM, 32 GB of internal storage, and a 12 MP camera on the back, capable of 4K UHD video recording, plus a 2 MP front shooter. Needless to say, Android L is the operating system of choice out of the box.
Breathtaking specs indeed, so we keep our hopes high that the Motorola Shamu will indeed transform into a Nexus 6, and will be announced together with an HTC-made Nexus 8 tablet on a separate Google event some time in September, as rumored. With these specs, both are shaping up to be worthy poster kids of the new Android L that will be hard to beat for the holiday season, so we can't wait for more info to trickle down the pipe.
Google Nexus 6 OS: Android 7.1 Nougat, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow, 5.1 Lollipop, 5.0 Lollipop View Full specs
- Display 6.0" 1440 x 2560 pixels
- Camera 13 MP / 2 MP front
- Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 805, Quad-core, 2700 MHz
- Storage 64 GB
- Battery 3220 mAh(24h talk time)
Posts: 1345; Member since: Nov 12, 2011
posted on Aug 13, 2014, 6:24 AM 18
Posts: 4562; Member since: Mar 13, 2014
With the Tegrak1, would've been much better.
posted on Aug 13, 2014, 7:23 AM 8
Posts: 277; Member since: Aug 15, 2013
Yeah, except with the QHD part. I don't care much for QHD display :S
posted on Aug 13, 2014, 8:05 AM 6
Posts: 113; Member since: Aug 16, 2012
I'll buy one if Shamu is waterproof.
posted on Aug 13, 2014, 4:42 PM 3
Posts: 104; Member since: Sep 26, 2013
Actually the Nexus smartphones ALWAYS have the highest end specs. No, not always the most megapixel cameras but CPU, GPU, RAM, display resolution/ppi always matches or beats what’s out there on the market. The 2011 gen3 Galaxy Nexus was one of the first two have HD 720p display, and with a large (for that time) 4.65″ screen. Dual core 1.2GHz CPU with 1GB RAM. In late 2011 benchmarks showed it handily beat the iPhone and Galaxy S model of that year. In 2012, the Nexus 4 had quad core CPU with 2GB RAM. Again, top of the line, beating the iPhone 5 and the Galaxy S3 In 2013, the Nexus 5 was one of the first phones (after the LG G2) to have the awesome Snapdragon 800. 4.95″, 1080p (which was standard by then), 2GB RAM. It topped the benchmark scores, matching the iPhone 5S and beating the Galaxy S4. Google does it right. The only complaint is usually about battery size and camera megapixels. But to come in at under $400, you really can’t complain much. Of course after the 2010 gen2 Galaxy S (4.0"), there was no more SD card slots, but that was to improve performance efficiency. It's a design decision by the engineers. Still people complain about that.
posted on Aug 14, 2014, 8:59 AM 2
Posts: 17; Member since: Aug 15, 2014
Don't forget that Nexus One, it was also at the front of the pack in terms of CPU. And it was one of the first phones to have active noise cancellation, long long before the iPhone. It really popularized that feature. It also used the Audience chip, which is by far the best noise cancellation chip. Bizarrely the Nexus S had no noise cancellation at all, the Galaxy Nexus had very bad noise cancellation, and the Nexus 4 and 5 have used Qualcomm's Fluence noise cancellation, which is okay, but nowhere near as good as the Audience chip. So the Nexus One is still the best of the Nexus phones for noise cancellation and was way ahead of it's time. This regression in all subseuqent Nexus phones continues to by a frustration, for me. Even Apple dropped the Audience chip, which they copied from the Nexus One by putting it in the iPhone 4, but then dropped it in the iPhone 5 for a very sucky in house solution. LG briefly used the Audience chip in some of their phones, as well as HTC. But they have both dropped it also. Only Samsung continues to consistently put the Audience chip in their flagship phones. So, strange as it is, the Nexus One is still at the head of the pack for in call noise cancellation, as good as the handful of current flagship phones that still use the Audience chip, and way better than anything else.
posted on Aug 15, 2014, 4:20 PM 0
Hope 64 GB version is made.
posted on Aug 13, 2014, 6:25 AM 16
Posts: 1918; Member since: Dec 07, 2011
They'd be stupid not to. It was idiotic of Motorola to not ship a 64GB version of the Moto X. Not sure what the reasoning was behind the Nexus series not shipping with 64GB with 32GB being the max.
posted on Aug 13, 2014, 7:17 AM 0
Posts: 361; Member since: May 31, 2013
Great specs, the comparison of yesterday was also interesting, because it shows it beats the LG G3 (6 vs 10,7 frames) on the same hardware. So either the device is heavily optimized or Android L is just that much better.
posted on Aug 13, 2014, 6:26 AM 5
Posts: 582; Member since: Jun 28, 2012
Really hoping that they finally get a Badass Camera in there. Something like 1/1.8" sensor size and OIS+ with great low light capabilites.
posted on Aug 13, 2014, 6:27 AM 10
Posts: 22; Member since: Nov 20, 2013
Nooooo 5.2 Is just too big... The N5 barely fits my pocket already :(
posted on Aug 13, 2014, 6:29 AM 4
Posts: 193; Member since: Oct 29, 2012
Quit wearing skinny jeans and it will fit easily.
posted on Aug 13, 2014, 6:38 AM 14
Posts: 228; Member since: Dec 22, 2012
.2 inches isn't that much, especially when bezels can be reduced so drastically. I was worried about it being a 6 inch phone lol. Hopefully Google puts some consistency in their naming and calls it the Nexus 5 (2014).
posted on Aug 13, 2014, 7:13 AM 8
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):