Living with the Samsung Galaxy S6, week 1: The cool embrace of metal-on-glass

This article may contain personal views and opinion from the author.

While I certainly wasn't the first person outside of Samsung to put his hands on the new Galaxy S6, I did get the opportunity to check it out in person immediately after its Unpacked 2015 event on the 1st of March — over a month before it hit the shelves worldwide. Somehow, I managed to stay at the helm of the stampede to the show floor, and just like that — I was now looking directly at what is likely to go down in history as one of Samsung's more ambitious projects to date.

Yeah, Samsung had a lot to prove. Sales were slumping, consumers were complaining, and it had something of an image problem that its main rival (and, ironically enough, business partner) Apple didn't. In fact, Apple was reaping crazy profits. While some of us may ridicule Samsung and play up other, up-and-coming manufacturers, the fact is that the South Korean behemoth remains the only real Android challenger as far as the iPhones are concerned. Again — Samsung had a lot to prove, and to an audience that some will agree is more demanding and has far fewer reasons to stick with the team.

Bespoke design, a more lightweight user interface, a camera combo that was up to speed with the times, and enough new hardware to excite the specs-hungry Android crowd. With that, Samsung would have a chance to deter naysayers that thought it weak and a victim of its own success, show its ability to innovate even when the stakes are highest, and cement its spot as Android's paragon. Not a trivial list, even when your market cap is measured in the hundreds of billions and you're the most vertically integrated phone maker out there. And yet, it seems like Samsung knocked each of these points off the list.

There's a world of difference between seem and did, however. Which is why I was commissioned to take the Galaxy S6 through its paces — much in the same way I did with its predecessor, the Galaxy S5, a year ago. Did Samsung really hit the nail on the head this time around?

The cool embrace of metal-on-glass

When you're in a position where you can look up and see no other branches above you — like Samsung is — you usually make for a great target for critics and consumers alike. Relentlessly, unmercifully, you're expected to deliver. On each and every occasion, and on each and every front. No clemency. Being top dog ain't easy.

For a while now, though, my opinion has been that the patient needed the bitter medicine. Not only has the company managed to seriously dilute the brand value of its Galaxy line — it containing dozens upon dozens of marginally different products — but it also underestimated our desire to wield devices that were computing powerhouses as much as they were fashion statements. To me, Samsung design never was an exciting topic, for its devices were often very plain-looking and utilitarian. That can be an advantage, of course, but given how capable even entry level devices are nowadays, it's only natural that diminishing returns in that area kicked in, and I and many others started attributing less value to ever faster chipsets and memory. Design is no longer a secondary or tertiary consideration.

Judging by the Galaxy S6, Samsung has definitely discovered that about us, and has delivered its most impressive design to date. Not only does the S6 feature a more impressive set of materials (metal and glass) for its extremely thin construction, it actually feels like an item that you want to take good care of, and one that you like fondling. Unfortunately, those two sheets of Gorilla Glass 4 protecting the front and back are magnets for fingerprints, but the rear piece is definitely the more problematic. The reasons for that are two.

First off, thanks to a nano-coating process that Samsung excitedly discussed during the Galaxy S6's unveiling, the rear actually glows in subtly different hues depending on the angle that light falls on it from. Furthermore, there's a depth that can be perceived under the glass, which definitely makes it easier to spot fingerprints and various smudges. And secondly, some of the color options simply fail to mask residual oils as well as the Black Sapphire model I've got handy. That's a good enough reason for me to steer away from the other options, save for maybe the white.

In any case, the glassy exterior of the Galaxy S6 complements the aluminum frame and power and volume buttons very well. A grade 6013 alloy, we're talking about aluminum of even higher quality than the one used with the newest iPhones (grade 6063) — lightweight and durable enough that it also happens to be a part of planes, cars, yachts, mountain bikes, and many other. According to Samsung, it's 1.5 times stronger than 6063, and 1.2 times more resistant to scratches.

Thinness is not all about compromises

While I definitely won't go as far as to claim that thinness is a useless metric — a slender device usually feels more luxurious than a bulky one, all things being equal — it's nevertheless a design decision that me and the rest of the PhoneArena team sometimes have a hard time justifying. Why? Because the trade-offs can be pretty steep.

Samsung shaved off 0.05 inches (1.3 mm) when transitioning from the Galaxy S5 to the Galaxy S6. That's a substantial reduction, and one that meant that the company had to settle for a smaller battery and a protruding camera on the back. And while thinness doesn't necessarily help with ergonomics, I have to say that, so long as you pick up a protective case with the S6, you'll be thankful for it. In fact, even without it, the Galaxy S6 is a comfortable device to hold and operate.

According to a 2014 poll I published, most of you will nevertheless cover the S6, despite Samsung's claims that its smartphone is anything but a glass canon. That's where its slim profile comes in handy, as the chart above shows. A gain of of 0.12 to 0.21 inches is easy to stomach when the material integrity of your flashy new Galaxy S6 is on the line.

Part of the club

While fingerprint scanners on smartphones is nothing really new, it wasn't until Apple released the iPhone 5s with Touch ID that the industry as a whole felt it simply had to jump on the bandwagon. What followed was a barrage of Android devices that touted a scanner of some type, and the list of manufacturers now includes the likes of HTC, Huawei, Meizu, Oppo, various other Chinese makers, and of course, Samsung! 

Indeed, starting with the Galaxy S5, Samsung also entered the club, though we'd argue that it was limited to the bike room at first. That's because its swipe-type scanners simply weren't good enough for everyday use, unless you were incredibly patient and forgiving. Sure, subsequent software updates did make things a little better, but the end result was still unsatisfactory for a flagship device. The issue was also compounded by the fact that you had to, somehow, manage a perfectly aimed swipe over the physical Home button (which doubles up as a scanner), making for some truly awkward movements. I'm honestly jubilant in saying that these days are behind us for good.

With the Galaxy S6, Samsung has finally moved to a touch-type scanner, and it works splendidly. Not only am I not required to perform a perfectly precise and awfully awkward swipe up anymore, I also no longer have to worry that I'll inevitably drop the phone whilst going for my 5th, likely unsuccessful, attempt. I've been using the fingerprint scanner since day one with the Galaxy S6, and I've been tremendously happy with it — especially since I am finally used to waking up the device with the Home button, and not the power key on the side.

But the sensor's application isn't limited to simply unlocking the device. You can use it to authenticate PayPal transactions and even to log into websites where you're registered and wouldn't want anyone making use of your account. At least as long as you're sticking with the default Samsung browser. Third-party apps, such as LastPass, can also make use of the scanner.

Best of both worlds: Samsung's new approach to display design

Samsung continues to be at the forefront of display technology, and it proved that with the Galaxy S6 edge. Not only is the sloping display of the Galaxy S6's cousin a remarkable feat of engineering, it's also one of the most color-accurate panels on the market. As you can imagine, the same is also true of the S6.

For years, however, Samsung's Super AMOLED displays have been a controversial topic to say the least. While they've always commanded a legion of supporters, it was hard arguing against hard data, which indicated some pretty significant inaccuracies in terms of color reproduction — usually of the overblown, extremely saturated type. But colors that 'pop' have been very effective in drawing consumers to Samsung devices, so the company has been resisting change for a long time. That time is now finally over, but instead of compromising on either aspects, the handset maker had a different, and quite ingenious idea.

Starting with Galaxy Tab S line of tablets, Samsung made true-to-life color reproduction an achievable target. No, it didn't give up on 'colors that pop', but instead introduced comprehensive display profiles that tweak the smorgasbord of variables that combine to create an image on the screen. This way, both camps were satisfied, as each had access to a preferred color profile. Not only does this approach work, it's actually preferable over having to settle for either.

As you can surmise, the Galaxy S6, with its 5.1-inch, 1440 x 2560 pixel resolution Super AMOLED display, is on the list of similarly blessed Samsung devices. Sure, it arrives at your doorstep with the default 'Adaptive' display profile on, but you can switch to 'Basic' in just a few taps. It may appear 'lifeless' next to AMOLED Cinema or AMOLED Photo, but it's by far the most color-accurate in the bunch, with an excellent color temperature of 6584 K (6500 is optimal!), meaning that whites are white, and grays are gray across the intensity spectrum. At 2.11, average gamma is also pretty decent (2.2 is optimal), though we observe a deterioration at higher brightness levels, where the image starts looking brighter, more washed out than it should. In general, however, we've got a very color-accurate display with a great RGB balance, all the while retaining the very healthy 563 nits of peak brightness and 2 nits at the lowest (awesome for night owls). This means that the coming of the summer shouldn't worry you — you'll be using the Galaxy S6 on the beach problem-free, even though that comes at the expense of color accuracy when you need it to go full out. In my opinion, that's more than a fair deal.

For what it's worth, I've been using the screen in 'Adaptive Display' mode, which tweaks contrast, color saturation, and sharpness depending on what's being shown on the screen, and that's been working well for me. The mode is also supposed to save you some much needed battery juice (more on that in due time) in the process. If you're a stickler for color accuracy, however, you might want to jump into Basic and make use of that.

Overall, top marks for Samsung's efforts with the Galaxy S6. It's the best of both worlds molded into a single display, and that ought to finally put the age-old Super AMOLED debate to rest. My only complaint? 3.7 million pixels on what is essentially a 5-incher simply can't be justified, especially since it comes at the cost of battery life. Notice that I'm not complaining that content for such a resolution is basically non-existent, even though it is, because that's how advancements in tech usually happen — early adopters cover most of the costs of R&D and get a bare minimum in return. If you're happy being one, then that's great. Personally, I'd argue that the Galaxy S6 would have been a better device had Samsung stuck with a lower resolution display, giving the battery a much-needed breather. Oh, how it could use one!

To be continued...

Story timeline

Related phones

Galaxy S6
  • Display 5.1" 1440 x 2560 pixels
  • Camera 16 MP / 5 MP front
  • Processor Samsung Exynos 7 Octa, Octa-core, 2100 MHz
  • Storage 128 GB
  • Battery 2550 mAh(23h 3G talk time)



1. PapaSmurf

Posts: 10457; Member since: May 14, 2012

Phone of 2015.

47. iCameToBashYou

Posts: 16; Member since: Feb 26, 2015

For a little while, anyways.

63. steodoreben

Posts: 379; Member since: Sep 26, 2013

I agree. "While fingerprint scanners on smartphones is nothing really new, it wasn't until Apple released the iPhone 5s with Touch ID that the industry as a whole felt it simply had to jump on the bandwagon." HMMM. I was thinking of Motorola ATRIX 4G.

2. TyrionLannister unregistered

I'm using for about a month now and I must agree that the display is bananas. Though the thing I'm really surprised about is the battery life. I expected really bad battery life and it turned out exceptional. I usually have about 60% left at the end of the day with about 2.5 hour screen on time.

4. arch_angel

Posts: 1651; Member since: Feb 20, 2015

same here bro

7. alouden unregistered

60% with 2.5 hours screen on time? That's pretty good.

11. maherk

Posts: 7054; Member since: Feb 10, 2012

My wife's S6 is doing muchhhh much better job in terms of battery life compared to my S6 Edge. I have a screenshot of the S6's battery chart, it managed to give 7:53hrs of sot with 16:31hrs of the charge and 7% left in it. The best i got with my Edge was close to 6:30 of sot, but is inconsistent and sometimes it can only give me 4 hrs of sot. Hopefully the released update will take care of this inconsistency once my Edge gets it.

27. TyrionLannister unregistered

The best I was able to get was about 7 hour 59 minute with 1% remaining. The 5.1 update will make it even better. Overall I'm happy with the battery life.

48. Slammer

Posts: 1515; Member since: Jun 03, 2010

You just damaged your battery by letting it drop below 10%. John B.

59. o0Exia0o

Posts: 903; Member since: Feb 01, 2013

There are conflicting reports on what is good for preserving the life of a cellphone battery. Some say that letting the battery drop below 50% is bad while others claim that below 20% is bad and then there are still others that claim that below 10% is bad. In my personal experience with cellular battery life I use my phone to the point of battery depletion where the phone shuts its self off and have seen no negative effects on my device or the battery life. I still average about 2 days of battery with, what I deem to be, moderate usage after about a year and a half. My wife on the other hand charges her phone every night, which it usually has 15-20% battery life left in it. The battery life on her phones seem to take a dive over the time she has them after about a year. Which report is about battery life is and the best time to recharge them is right or wrong I cant say, but judging by my own personal experience in the matter I would not be quick to judge Tyrionlannister on how he uses/recharges his property, it is after all his device and he will have to pay to have it repaired or replaced if his usage damages or disables it. -Exia-

20. osubucks69

Posts: 15; Member since: Dec 12, 2012

Thats great to hear because I was a little concerned about battery life. I usually get 2 days from my S5. What about call quality?

25. TyrionLannister unregistered

The call quality is pretty good. If you think your S5 is good, the S6 is better.

41. osubucks69

Posts: 15; Member since: Dec 12, 2012

Thanks. Getting the itch to go get one...

3. arch_angel

Posts: 1651; Member since: Feb 20, 2015

I use the basic screen mode. I like color accuracy above all else.

10. natypes

Posts: 1110; Member since: Feb 02, 2015

I agree. Although many apps I don't notice much difference except clash of clans. It's horrible looking in any other setting but basic. Very over saturated.

13. maherk

Posts: 7054; Member since: Feb 10, 2012

Amoled cenima for me. What can I say, i love to get punched by those amazing colors the screen produces.

8. Jason2k13

Posts: 1477; Member since: Mar 28, 2013

bought my s6 edge when it 1st came out, and I have no problems with it so far. I haven't experienced lag yet, no reboot and only overheats when its charging. Only problam I have is ram management, but then again it hasn't really affected me much since apps still run fast.

17. ithotarachi

Posts: 7; Member since: May 12, 2015

Same here bro, some people are complaining about the lack of efficient ram management, but apps still run fast, and I'm getting a considerable amount of improvement in the battery life after switching from the iphone 6.

35. drewcheek98

Posts: 2; Member since: Jun 03, 2014

Wow metal and glass, it's not like the iPhone 4 had years ago but of course android fans are gonna say this is the best designed phone ever

38. j2001m

Posts: 3061; Member since: Apr 28, 2014

The glass on the iPhone 4 was cheap crapwith the normal cheap metal. Apple use, plus the edge is got the edge and users are paying more then the iPhone for the 1st time just for looks, hahahah, that and the best tech cash can buy

40. drewcheek98

Posts: 2; Member since: Jun 03, 2014

actually the metal was stainless steel

55. Taters

Posts: 6474; Member since: Jan 28, 2013

Which was the wrong choice considering antennae gate. Lol

57. c.hack

Posts: 614; Member since: Dec 09, 2009

Compared to the S6 crap the iPhone 4 from many years ago was a much better design. The S6 parts fit poorly. Its nothing but another slavish copy of Apple. Samsuck said their phones were better than Apple because they had a removable battery - no more. Slavishly copying Apple. Samsuck said their phones were better than Apple because they had a removable storage - no more. Slavishly copying Apple. But with all the crapware Samsuck and the carriers put in their phones they desparately need that expandable memory. I guess if you're fool enough to but Samsuck junk you don't know any better.

61. Taters

Posts: 6474; Member since: Jan 28, 2013

Hack is a very fitting name for you because you are obviously an uneducated hack.

62. g2a5b0e unregistered

You clearly taking it very personally. It might be time for you to grow up & realize that none of this really matters that much.

39. o0Exia0o

Posts: 903; Member since: Feb 01, 2013

Wow a 5.5" 1080p screen, its not like android had years ago but of course Apple fans are gonna say this is the best designed phone ever.... See I can play that game too....

45. TerryTerius unregistered

You... You do realize that material usage and design are two completely different things right? Wallets and messenger bags, boxers and t shirts, or forks and spoons must all look identical to you because of their similar materials.

54. Taters

Posts: 6474; Member since: Jan 28, 2013

Go do an iPhone 4 vs gs6 drop test and you will see the difference.

58. c.hack

Posts: 614; Member since: Dec 09, 2009

Yeah the S6 shatters because it uses cheaper glass and is poorly constructed. I saw one shatter from a 6 inch drop onto a desk.

60. Taters

Posts: 6474; Member since: Jan 28, 2013

Lol okay there retarded. The gorilla glass 4 glass is cheaper than the homemade gorilla glass 1/ ion glass on the iPhone 4....right..... Lol

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.
FCC OKs Cingular's purchase of AT&T Wireless