Latest issue for Samsung: Galaxy S7 rear camera lens mysteriously shatters


One company happy to see 2016 end tonight is Samsung. The company had a great start to 2016 as the Samsung Galaxy S7 and Samsung Galaxy S7 edge quickly became the top Android flagship models. And smartphone fanatics were eagerly awaiting the feature packed Samsung Galaxy Note 7. This was to be the first Galaxy Note model to be protected from the rain. And with that IP68 certification rating, the phablet could be submerged in up to nearly 5-feet of water for as long as 30-minutes and escape unscathed.

But in an attempt to throw everything into the Galaxy Note 7 but the kitchen sink, Samsung engineers tried to create internal space by designing a svelte battery. But in doing so, Samsung apparently didn't leave enough room to prevent volatile parts of the cell from touching. As a result, several Galaxy Note 7 units exploded. A couple of recalls later, and the Galaxy Note 7 was pulled off the market.

The latest problem affecting Samsung has to do with the camera on the back of the Galaxy S7. In a story that was published in the Consumerist last week, a Galaxy S7 owner named Sean woke up and discovered that the glass on his back camera had shattered even though it was left untouched and in a case overnight. 

As you might imagine, Sammy wasn't buying the story and refused to honor the warranty. Other owners of this model have apparently been experiencing the same issue and have posted about it on the Samsung Community website. While Samsung's response to some of the posts call the damage an "isolated incident," the thread contains 22 pages of similar complaints.

Even if you've already laid out the $70 or so that it costs to repair the camera lens, legal help might be on the way. A law firm named Keller Rohrback L.L.P. is looking to speak with Galaxy S7 owners whose rear camera lens shattered despite the lack of any impact. If this has indeed happened to you and Samsung refuses to give you the time of day, click on the sourcelink. The law might be on your side.


source: KellerRohrbackLLP, SamsungCommunities, Consumerist via Forbes

Related phones

Galaxy S7
  • Display 5.1" 1440 x 2560 pixels
  • Camera 12 MP / 5 MP front
  • Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 820, Quad-core, 2200 MHz
  • Storage 32 GB + microSDXC
  • Battery 3000 mAh(28h 3G talk time)
Galaxy S7 edge
  • Display 5.5" 1440 x 2560 pixels
  • Camera 12 MP / 5 MP front
  • Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 820, Quad-core, 2200 MHz
  • Storage 32 GB + microSDXC
  • Battery 3600 mAh(36h 3G talk time)

FEATURED VIDEO

143 Comments

1. Klinton

Posts: 1409; Member since: Oct 24, 2016

So killing Note7 was not good enough??? LOL Too bad. Samsung even without the Great Note7 managed great with the older GalaxyS7/7Edge. Still the best phones of the year 2016. That's not acceptable. Righ? So the organized attacks and scams should never stop. BTW does any US lab have found what is the ''problem'' with Note7? I mean real proved, not BS speculations!

2. ctdog4748

Posts: 797; Member since: Mar 05, 2016

Obviously there was a problem with the Note 7 otherwise Samsung wouldn't have recalled it. Twice.

6. Klinton

Posts: 1409; Member since: Oct 24, 2016

Really? And what was the problem? Please tell us! Except of that US(China, Tawan) can not make device in this category and all ppl, even the iboys fall in love with Note7? Or the jackless iPhone7 and lame Pixel were in danger(meaning Wall Street) And all the fake reports were over the US media every single day? And even the US(China, Taiwan) authorities were involved. Even Obama. ROTFL

21. Dr.Phil

Posts: 2442; Member since: Feb 14, 2011

Doesn't Obama use a Samsung phone now? I'm pretty sure he does since he stopped using his Blackberry. Also, why would the US want to harm Samsung when Samsung just announced two separate U.S. investments of $1 billion over the next year for more chipsets at it's Austin, TX factory and another $1.2 billion over 4 years for the development of the IoT in the U.S.? Not to mention they employ over 15,000 people in the country that contribute economical gains and tax dollars. And Apple uses Samsung for chipset manufacturing and will very soon need Samsung for it's displays. I'm sorry, but this conspiracy that Apple and the US want Samsung to fail just doesn't seem in any bit logical. Apple has more to lose if Samsung fails because while Samsung focuses it's R&D dollars on producing better chipset manufacturing processes, better display technology, etc. Apple is able to use it's R&D dollars to focus on things like car technology, software development, and technology design. You do realize that when Samsung loses, it means less money going into R&D which means someone would have to pick up the tab. Apple doesn't want to have to divert research dollars away from what it's doing because it's relying on Samsung to make these developments that end up benefiting Apple products.

27. mikehunta727 unregistered

Don't mind the nonsense conspiracy spouting nonsense. You can't change their minds dude, I am not sure what it is with heavy Samsung fans but they seem the most emotional and sensitive to me from my years of experience in both person and seeing many forum posts across a multitude of sites.

40. Klinton

Posts: 1409; Member since: Oct 24, 2016

'Don't mind the nonsense conspiracy spouting nonsense' To say that you must give some reasonable explanation of what's going on. I just explained my points. I'm not 'heavy Samsung fan' ! I stay with Notes only because no other OEM can make device in this category. I hate that. Samsung started to behave like Apple there. Don't listen to us. Hunting for apple-zombies. Made Note 5 with sealed battery and no SD support. With Note7 SD support is back at least.

47. kiko007

Posts: 7500; Member since: Feb 17, 2016

"To say that you must give some reasonable explanation of what's going on. I just explained my points." No. As the arguing party, it is YOUR job to provide evidence as to your claim.....not him. That's Debate 101. "I'm not 'heavy Samsung fan' !" ^Says that, followed by.... "I stay with Notes only because no other OEM can make device in this category." #TrumpSupporterLogic "I hate that." That is relevant to Doc's rebuttal how exactly? "Samsung started to behave like Apple there. Don't listen to us. Hunting for apple-zombies. Made Note 5 with sealed battery and no SD support. With Note7 SD support is back at least." Breaking News: Company in the business of making money is trying to do just that......MAKING MONEY. We have a reporter on sight to analyze the shocking scoop.........news at 11./s

53. Klinton

Posts: 1409; Member since: Oct 24, 2016

'Company in the business of making money is trying to do just that......MAKING MONEY.' Of course! But why shouldn't we hate it, when there is not competition in this category '#TrumpSupporterLogic' What's wrong with the logic, if there is not Note-like device in the market. Involving politics here to prove you ''point'' is pathetic. I'm not Trump's fan, simply hate Hilary. But what connection you see with Note 7 here?(except of the media of course) 'No. As the arguing party, it is YOUR job to provide evidence as to your claim.....not him' Here you have it. 1.No Note7 exploded after the ban. 2. The year has passed and no proved ''problems'' with Note7 announced- not by Samsung, neither by any US lab or other labs. Does it means something to you?

72. wando77

Posts: 1168; Member since: Aug 23, 2012

3) No s7 phones catching fire before the ban. Now they are catching fire after the ban. No camera glass complaints either. This is Apple etc systematically taking down their biggest competitor.

115. trojan_horse

Posts: 5868; Member since: May 06, 2016

My sentiment exactly...^^ I think there's probably foul play behind this whole Note7 fiasco... Samsung can't be friends with everyone, after all.

131. mikehunta727 unregistered

Sammobile reported it a few days ago beforE PA. You know it's legit when Sammobile reports a negative issue like this on their website Also do you really think Apple is actually doing this..? It could be any of Samsung's competitors really that is doing this but i highly doubt there is sabotage going on, just seems like conspiracy nut s**t. Samsung is actually the only one to hand been caught red handed trying to sabotage other companies by paying people to troll online regarding other companies products and leave false bad reviews on competitors products and etc

132. Klinton

Posts: 1409; Member since: Oct 24, 2016

'You know it's legit when Sammobile reports a negative issue like this on their website' LOL LOL LOL So you are the only one, that doesn't know ...SamMobile is created by bunch of iboys to look ''legit'' , just like Cult of Android is made by the guys from Cult Of Mac SamMobile has NOTHING to do with Samsung, except of to strike from the back and other media to fool ppl by quoting it.

139. trojan_horse

Posts: 5868; Member since: May 06, 2016

I'm proud of you for this post ^^. You nailed it. Good job in debunking the logic that just because SamMobile reported on a negative issue about Samsung makes it legit. First off, SamMobile has no affiliation with Samsung. Secondly, SamMobile is just a news site which makes revenue by publishing hot-topic reports. SamMobile also reported on the incident of a Note7 catching fire and burning a Jeep, but it was later proven (by investigators) that the incident was fake and not legit!

140. Klinton

Posts: 1409; Member since: Oct 24, 2016

Yup SamMobile was created, just for one simple reason: Bashing Samsung to look ''legit''. And other media to quote it ....like ''news coming from Samsung's site''. BTW most of those 'AndroidBlah' named sites are created with the same reason.

157. mikehunta727 unregistered

SamMobile is widely known on the internet, from XDA, all the way to GSMArena as one of the best sources for Samsung information, but you the conspiracy nut claims "iBoys" made the site . You have no good arguments ever and you have failed this argument miserably. Nothing you say changes the fact that consumers who have the S7 are reporting this issue directly to CPA Me thinks Klinton and Trojan Horse are the same users, Trojan Horse always needs to have himself "validated" by someone else and can never participate in the argument himself. Classic fake strongman argument

159. mikehunta727 unregistered

Over 100+ positive Samsung news articles posted to Sammobile this year, roughly 25-30 negative news articles for Samsung this year on Sammobile, most of them being from the Note 7 saga only. You are clueless and are just talking out of your ass now. Cult of Mac and cult of Android literally have nothing to do with Sammobile lmao...classic strawman argument you are putting up mate. You know the trolls are for real on this site when they are now trying to debunk Sammobile and claim "iboys made it" Sammobile isn't like PA and reports anything that is clickbaitish, the writers on sammobile go out and get their stories verified/accuracy check before publishing, it is a site run by passionate Samsung fans and users Time for you to go back into the troll pad with your tin foil hat now, pizzagate needs some more studying!

156. mikehunta727 unregistered

What did he debunk? Sammobile is the place for Samsung fans to get up to date accurate information on Samsung news. SamMobile only reports stories that have been verified to occur , just check their Service agreement, says so right there. Them reporting the Jeep incident doesnt make them any less wrong, they simply reported what was occuring and they recitified the title after the investigation also rightfully so. With the S7 glass cracking, it is consumers reporting this issue to th Consumer protecion agency and them reporting it publically. No one said Sammobile has affiliation with Samsung, that doesnt change anything regardless at the fact that users are reporting this issue. So both you guys can hold this L now for the failed argument you have put up

158. mikehunta727 unregistered

Here is your logic, negative Samsung story comes up, you say this : "oh corporate sabotage, I dont doubt if someone or Apple is purposefully sabotaging this, this story is probably fake, Sammobile is just a regular news website despite most of the internet knowing it is one of the best sources for accurate Samsung news!" and then when another company has a negative news story you rip and blast them, fanboy logic. You are whats called the classic emotional Samsung sheep on the internet. It helps to be a realist who is grounded in reality. You make genuine Android tech lovers look bad

155. mikehunta727 unregistered

Sammobile is created by a bunch of iBoys? Sammobile was created by Samsung fans over 4 years ago as a place for Samsung users to get accurate information on Samsung news. Sammobile reported it because a consumer agency has been getting reports of consumers S7's glass cameras starting to crack. You have failed once again

162. mikehunta727 unregistered

http://www.samsunggeeks.com/2012/12/19/who-are-sammobile-sammobile-com-interview/ "made by iBoys" More like the complete opposite actually Sammobile is the largest Samsung community around https://www.sammobile.com/about-us/ 6.4 million unique visitors visited Sammobile in April 2015, most of the users coming from the U.S, in which Samsung has a very heavy presence in. Your argument of "iBoys" has been utterly destroyed and regurgitated and shat back out

75. sissy246

Posts: 7124; Member since: Mar 04, 2015

"I stay with Notes only because no other OEM can make device in this category." "#TrumpSupporterLogic" That makes no since. He is right, no other company has made a note type phone with note features.

55. mikehunta727 unregistered

Blah blah pizzagate, blah Trump going to bring back all coal jobs blah blah, CHYna blah Dr. Phil logically broke down your poor argument. Take the tin foil helmet off

59. Klinton

Posts: 1409; Member since: Oct 24, 2016

Let's hope that Dr. Phil is happy with your dumb ''support''. LOL

61. mikehunta727 unregistered

Hold this L for failing your argument bad

28. Klinton

Posts: 1409; Member since: Oct 24, 2016

'why would the US want to harm Samsung' They don't want(and they can not) kill Samsung. Simply they don't wan't Samsung to be on the top of the most profitable industry. And to suck up the apple's zombies. The zombies are the blood of the Wall Street's darling stock. Of course without Samsung we will not have today's technology. But the business is business. For them is better Samsung to make newest tech components, R&D innovations.....and Apple just to pack them, put fancy color and take the cream of the profit. China is other case, but ,,,,same

46. Dr.Phil

Posts: 2442; Member since: Feb 14, 2011

Except Samsung stock has gone up a lot more than Apple's stock. In fact, after Samsung's second recall, Apple stock fell significantly over the following month. Even if you had invested in Samsung stock before the Note recall, you still would have made a significant profit at this point. It hardly affected their stock. And as I have argued in my other comments, the recall was actually in some ways a blessing for both Samsung and consumers. The Note 7 was not really that big of an upgrade over the previous Note 5. It wasn't like the jump from the Note 3 to the Note 4 where there was this more significant upgrade. In fact, there were a lot of people who commented on here when the Note 7 released wondering what was so different from the S7 edge or the previous Note 5. So now Samsung has something to prove to consumers and I have no doubt they are going to put everything they have into ensuring the next Note is top tier and in some ways revolutionary from the rest of the Note series.

56. Klinton

Posts: 1409; Member since: Oct 24, 2016

'Except Samsung stock has gone up a lot more than Apple's stock.' It was not expected. But imagine if Note7 was not killed(just look at the Note7 owners) Well I agree that Note7 was not huge upgrade(though it was not less than Note4 over Note3). But it nailed it with the design and the size over dislay comparing the iPhones, for tempting the world's zombies that Apple posses right now, wating(and promised by the media year after year)- small bezel and unique phone . Do not underestimate the market researches of the US authorities, They ware stoned by the market researches and got desperate. The company that posses world's zombies, posses the cream of the business, And the stock Pyramid. So that was unacceptable. Period

150. BlackhawkFlys

Posts: 924; Member since: May 07, 2014

Note 7 was waterproof, It had a microSD card Slot, It had a curved screen, It had a better design than the Note 5, It's S-Pen was better than the Note 5, It had a better camera than the Note 5. A note is not comparable to an S7. They are both very different devices.

30. Tariq123

Posts: 186; Member since: May 15, 2016

I think Google did it cuz they knew their phone is crap lol

71. Klinton

Posts: 1409; Member since: Oct 24, 2016

Not only Googe. Or Apple (even I don't thing they are the main players in this game) The plot is on higher level : Wall Street, US authorities ....and of course China having same interest ...helping. If you CAN'T make Note....kill Note.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.