Asus Eee Pad Slider benchmark tests

Asus Eee Pad Slider benchmark tests
After being impressed unanimously by the Asus Transformer Prime, our expectations in terms of raw processing power has been raised, but considering that the Asus Eee Pad Slider is sporting the same internals as the original Transformer, we’re not expecting to see the same results.

Very much a first-generation Honeycomb tablet, the Asus Eee Pad Slider is powered by none other than a dual-core NVIDIA Tegra 2 processor. Relatively speaking, it’s sufficient enough to carry most basic tasks with minimal effort, but in testing out its full capacity, we do notice the usual instances of choppiness and sluggishness with its performance. With static wallpapers, the Eee Pad Slider offers a decent amount of responsiveness while navigating across its homescreen – though, there are some sprinklings of slowdown. However, it’s never to the point stagnant, but at times, such as in the case of using live wallpapers, it becomes increasingly prevalent.



Rightfully so, the benchmark scores put up the tablet are indicative of any other dual-core CPU packing tablet we’ve seen in the past running on Honeycomb. For starters, we’re able to get scores between 1,500 and 1,900 on Quadrant, which are hardly eye-catching numbers in this day and age. Nevertheless, the scores are justified marks in keeping it in good light with its rivals. Moreover, the AnTutu benchmark test graces it with an overall score of 5,099, which is yet again something that’s not particularly earth shattering. Indeed, it meets the results established by other dual-core wielding devices out there, like the LG Optimus 2x and HTC EVO 3D, but it’s nowhere close to the numbers delivered by class leading devices such as the Asus Transformer Prime, Samsung Galaxy Nexus, and Galaxy S II.

Related phones

Eee Pad Slider
  • Display 10.1" 1280 x 800 pixels
  • Camera 5 MP / 1.3 MP front
  • Processor NVIDIA Tegra 2, Dual-core, 1200 MHz
  • Storage 32 GB

FEATURED VIDEO

6 Comments

1. Birds

Posts: 1172; Member since: Nov 21, 2011

I don't care I still want one.

2. toaster

Posts: 114; Member since: Sep 13, 2011

It's 2012. Please stop using Quadrant. It is almost useless at giving an accurate representation.

4. twenti7

Posts: 152; Member since: Jul 09, 2011

Agreed. A couple years ago the EPA changed their test for estimating fuel economy in cars because manufacturers began to make cars able to perform better in the tests than in real-life driving. Phone manufacturers seem to be doing the same thing.

3. belovedson

Posts: 1061; Member since: Nov 30, 2010

it runs at around the same price as the original transformer and keyboard combo on sale? i dont get it whats the point

5. twenti7

Posts: 152; Member since: Jul 09, 2011

It costs a bit less than buying the keyboard dock with the Transformer. And in my personal experience, the built-in keyboard is much more responsive than the separate keyboard dock.

6. remixfa

Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008

its a +/- experience. The built in keyboard is way more convenient than having to remember to bring the Add on, and its more cost effective. However, the add on brings with it a second battery and more connection options... and i believe a slightly bigger keyboard. So like anything, its pick what you want more. Price and convenience, or extended battery and options.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.