Apple drops a patent and some claims against Samsung in ITC suit
posted by Alan F. / Mar 12, 2012, 6:26 PM
The claim construction rulings determine if the judge agrees with either side about certain terms used in each parties claims and can often decide who will win a patent infringement case. The patent involved in the claim construction that Samsung won, U.S. Patent No. 7,863,533, is for a "cantilevered push button having multiple contacts and fulcrums," and is being dropped from the case by Apple. Also being dropped by Apple are claims 1-3, 11, 12, 15, 16, and 21-27 of U.S. Patent No. 7,789,697 on "plug detection mechanisms ", and claim 3 of U.S. Patent No. 7,479,949. The latter patent is known as the "touchscreen heuristics patent" which was co-invented by the late Steve Jobs. This claim deals with which object on the UI is selected when two objects on the have overlapping "hit regions".
Most courts smile on the act of simplification, especially when it involves a number of technological issues like we have here. Next on the agenda is the actual trial, set to start May 31st and end on June 6th. And from there, we expect to get the ruling. Apple will now have 4 patents at issue in this particular case against Samsung.
CAN WE PLEASE STOP TALKING BOUT APPLE VS. SAMSUNG FOR ONCE AND GET BACK TO PHONE NEWS. THIS IS GETTING NONSENSE. AND I BLAME Apple that started this law suit in the first place
posted on Mar 12, 2012, 7:31 PM 7
Posts: 3; Member since: Mar 07, 2012
i blame Samsung for copying apple in the first place
posted on Mar 12, 2012, 7:36 PM 4
Posts: 1476; Member since: Dec 01, 2011
and I blame Apple for not being competitive enough to take it like a man and beat Samsung with good products instead of lawsuits. Look at Pepsi, it was pretty much a Coca-cola copy, yet Coca-cola is still more famous.
posted on Mar 12, 2012, 8:00 PM 11
Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008
having some asthetic similarities are not grounds to sue your competition out of existence. If it were, Nike would have sued Reebok, Addidas, and all the others for making shoes that resembled their basic shape. That is basically what Apple tried to do. Did Zenith sue everyone that made a 4:3 TV in a box shape?? Did Sony sue everyone that made a 16:9 flatscreen? At least now they are using actual patents which is much more legit since its a patent, but as we know the patent process in america is beyond broken anyways. This was nothing more than Jobs obsession which was only brought to fruit because of their seemingly unlimited supply of cash to constantly sue everyone. You are not guilty just because you get sued, and your not innocent just because your doing the suing. HOPEFULLY this means that Cook is starting to lighten the lawyer load of frivolous bully lawsuits.
posted on Mar 12, 2012, 9:25 PM 4
Posts: 1994; Member since: Jun 15, 2011
You can sue for asthetics in my opinion if someone is stealing brand identity but not for stupid things like the act of sliding to unlock or having a phone with a black bezel that is touchscreen. Its up to the judge to decide if brand identity is stolen.
posted on Mar 12, 2012, 10:57 PM 1
Posts: 35; Member since: Mar 02, 2012
This Alan F. dude purposely writes stuff to get people to argue lol. Just relax people, and go play with your smart phones. you will feel better afterwards :-)
posted on Mar 12, 2012, 9:26 PM 9
Posts: 6330; Member since: Mar 31, 2010
Whatever company had the first actual screen on a phone should sue APPLE as they copied that idea and put a screen on their phone....shame on APPLE....and that keyboard with the letter Q - APPLE should be sued for placing that on the keyboard....
posted on Mar 13, 2012, 2:32 AM 1
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):