x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Hidden picShow menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Alleged iPhone X specs leak out: 2.5GHz chipset, high-res display, and 512 GB version

Alleged iPhone X specs leak out: 2.5GHz chipset, high-res display, and 512 GB version

Posted: , by Daniel P. Daniel P.

Tags :

Alleged iPhone X specs leak out: 2.5GHz chipset, high-res display, and 512 GB version


Alleged carrier database listing of one iPhone X

Alleged carrier database listing of one iPhone X

There has never been an iPhone as leaked as the upcoming "all-screen" edition dubbed tentatively iPhone X, and today is no exception. Hours before the actual announcement, the Russkies seemingly strike again, leaking information about the most anticipated phone of the season. We kid, but what you see below is seemingly a screen grab from a carrier database that lists the specs and different versions of one iPhone X.


Since the screen diagonal is listed as 5.8" with 1125 x 2436 pixels, we can only assume that the alleged screen grab features the "bezel-less" iPhone X rumored to start at $999. What will you get for a grand provided that this leak below holds water in the end? Well, an AMOLED display, 2.5 GHz Apple A11 chipset, 12 MP camera set, and 3 GB of RAM is what the specs show. The rumors about the eventual RAM and internal storage amounts seem to be reiterated here one more time, so we might indeed see a 512 GB version that would reportedly cost $1199 being announced today. Fun times.


source: @VenyaGeskin1


50 Comments
  • Options
    Close





posted on 12 Sep 2017, 07:33 9

1. Myphoneisonfire (Posts: 398; Member since: 05 Sep 2016)


Nice , Can't wait for the Ultimate combo.
Main phone : Note 8 ( Exynos )
Second Phone : iPhone X

posted on 12 Sep 2017, 07:34 15

4. notfair (Posts: 233; Member since: 30 Jan 2017)


why would you do that? to show off that you're not poor?

posted on 12 Sep 2017, 07:49 2

12. sgodsell (Posts: 5057; Member since: 16 Mar 2013)


Well if iOS stays the same, then you cannot run multiple tasks at once, but the Note 8 can and it supports split screen multitasking. Something that all iPhone's have yet to even try.

posted on 12 Sep 2017, 07:50 3

13. Cat97 (Posts: 416; Member since: 02 Mar 2017)


No, to show that he only has one kidney left.

posted on 12 Sep 2017, 07:50 14

14. SupermanayrB (Posts: 1185; Member since: 20 Mar 2012)


Maybe he's a tech junkie that likes to switch back & forth between platforms, who's also not poor.

posted on 12 Sep 2017, 08:10 1

21. drunkenjay (Posts: 1103; Member since: 11 Feb 2013)


yeah. im also a tech junky and go back and forth with apple and samsung products as well.

posted on 12 Sep 2017, 08:02 8

20. Myphoneisonfire (Posts: 398; Member since: 05 Sep 2016)


I only mean't to show my love for cutting edge consumer tech. You just took it the wrong way.

posted on 12 Sep 2017, 08:35

25. disatrousrainbow (Posts: 43; Member since: 24 Oct 2015)


It's still highly excessive. I mean, I used to rock two phones for work but never out of choice because, well, again, excess but hey I guess if it works for you...

posted on 12 Sep 2017, 10:09

47. Klinton (Posts: 925; Member since: 24 Oct 2016)


And what 'cutting edge tech' in iPhone you see?
So if you already have Note 8 , to buy iPhone8 too?
Beg to explain!

posted on 12 Sep 2017, 08:20

23. KingSam (Posts: 626; Member since: 13 Mar 2016)


Why does it bother you?Are you poor? Its his damn money. And some of us like the best of both worlds. My phone has 1 GB ram and a crap mediatek so I'm not rich either.

posted on 12 Sep 2017, 08:48

30. Mreveryphone (Posts: 1397; Member since: 22 Apr 2014)


I'm probably going to do the same. My note 8 is already getting long in the tooth...

posted on 12 Sep 2017, 09:16

37. Plasticsh1t (Posts: 2443; Member since: 01 Sep 2014)


Long in the tooth? Some people will never get satisfied (assuming that you're serious about it).

posted on 12 Sep 2017, 09:30

42. TechGirl90 (Posts: 386; Member since: 06 Feb 2017)


Pardon my ignorance, but what does "Long in the tooth" mean?

posted on 12 Sep 2017, 09:37

43. kiko007 (Posts: 5733; Member since: 17 Feb 2016)


Older... essentially. Or another way to look at it is the Note isn't the new kid on the block anymore, and he's testing different waters.

posted on 12 Sep 2017, 10:07 1

46. Mreveryphone (Posts: 1397; Member since: 22 Apr 2014)


Nah... I'm just being facetious... I will more than likely get the anniversary edition is it's advanced enough and not just a rehashed 7 with all screen front...

posted on 12 Sep 2017, 07:34 3

2. notfair (Posts: 233; Member since: 30 Jan 2017)


typically apple. base version 64, then skips the 128 and goes straight forward to humongous storages, which I like. good for you apple.

posted on 12 Sep 2017, 07:51 8

15. Cat97 (Posts: 416; Member since: 02 Mar 2017)


They do this (skipping the perfect size/sweet spot) in order to milk more money from customers, there is no other reason. Apple pays like $2 per 128GB chip, and they charge customers $100 extra.

posted on 12 Sep 2017, 07:52 2

17. Scott93274 (Posts: 5582; Member since: 06 Aug 2013)


lol, you think 512 MB is a lot of storage?

posted on 12 Sep 2017, 07:53 2

19. Scott93274 (Posts: 5582; Member since: 06 Aug 2013)


Aw, damn, they fixed their typo.

posted on 12 Sep 2017, 09:19

38. Nathan_ingx (Posts: 4376; Member since: 07 Mar 2012)


Well, at least, it's a first for a mobile to come with that amount of storage.
Apple #Revolutionary.

posted on 12 Sep 2017, 10:15 3

48. trojan_horse (Posts: 5337; Member since: 06 May 2016)


Yeah, though previous Android handsets have been offering SD card capacity to up 2TB of expandable storage... Too bad that kind of capacity isn't available yet, 'cause it'll be dope!

posted on 12 Sep 2017, 07:34

3. CreeDiddy (Posts: 1039; Member since: 04 Nov 2011)


Can't wait for 2018 launch...my phone is the 6.4" Plus model...

posted on 12 Sep 2017, 07:36

5. AVVA1 (Posts: 45; Member since: 01 Aug 2017)


EXCITED

posted on 12 Sep 2017, 07:36 7

6. fyahking (Posts: 1036; Member since: 28 Jan 2015)


512 MB!!!

posted on 12 Sep 2017, 07:46 1

8. Scott93274 (Posts: 5582; Member since: 06 Aug 2013)


Hello 1985. lol

posted on 12 Sep 2017, 08:41

27. g2a5b0e (Posts: 3914; Member since: 08 Jun 2012)


More like 1995. We got our first desktop around '94. It was fairly high-end at the time & it had 512 MB of storage. Computers in 1985 were still working with KBs.

posted on 12 Sep 2017, 08:49

32. Soundjudgment (Posts: 171; Member since: 10 Oct 2016)


Lay off of my 20MB Seagate Hard Drive!!

posted on 12 Sep 2017, 09:12

35. thxultra (Posts: 254; Member since: 16 Oct 2014)


break out those 5.25inch double density disks 400kb woohooo

posted on 12 Sep 2017, 09:25

41. Scott93274 (Posts: 5582; Member since: 06 Aug 2013)


ya'll are funny. :)

posted on 12 Sep 2017, 09:24

40. Scott93274 (Posts: 5582; Member since: 06 Aug 2013)


Na! I had a 10GB Hewlett Packard in 1998... though I think you might be right that 512 MB might have been a bit much for 1985.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories