Alleged Galaxy S5 (SM-G900F) version appears on AnTuTu with 2.5 GHz chipset and 3 GB of RAM
posted by Daniel P. / Dec 19, 2013, 5:45 AM
An eventual Samsung Galaxy S5 candidate has been unearthed, under the codename SM-G900F, in AnTuTu's benchmark database, just as it appeared in Browsermark not long ago. The handset seems restricted to 1080p display resolution, despite the numerous rumors about it sporting a 2K HD, 1440x2560 pixels screen.
the one with ISOCELL technology that Samsung bragged about not long ago.
Now, this could be just a working prototype of the Galaxy S5, though this late in the game, with an eventual Q1 launch, Samsung is probably hitting the conveyor belts with the handset already. Alternatively, there might be a more premium brand from Samsung next year, the elusive F-series handsets we heard about, which will sport the rumored 2K flagship with metallic chassis and 64-bit Exynos processor. Let's not forget that we had an SM-G900S leaked not long ago, and this one was listed with 1440x2560 screen, plus the same 2.5 GHz chipset, while an SM-G900A was claimed to be in testing by AT&T, so there are obviously plenty of Galaxy S5 versions floating around at the moment.
Samsung Galaxy S5 OS: Android 6.0 Marshmallow, 5.1 Lollipop, 5.0 Lollipop, 4.4.4, 4.4.2 View Full specs
- Display 5.1" 1080 x 1920 pixels
- Camera 16 MP / 2.1 MP front
- Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 801, Quad-core, 2500 MHz
- Storage 32 GB + microSDXC
- Battery 2800 mAh(21h 3G talk time)
Posts: 60; Member since: Aug 15, 2013
only 3GBs of ram?! is this a joke?! I wanna play Halo 5 on my phone, I need more ram and ofc more pixels! fu** the battery life, OS n design!
posted on Dec 19, 2013, 6:10 AM 19
Posts: 140; Member since: Aug 16, 2012
I will bet that the Samsung Galaxy S5 will not be a 64 bits, no 16MP camera, no 2K Screen resolution and no metal building! I bet! Who agree with me?
posted on Dec 19, 2013, 6:12 AM 7
Posts: 1021; Member since: Nov 02, 2013
Me. It would be suicidal and foolish launching a 64-bit phone running a 32-bit OS.
posted on Dec 19, 2013, 6:31 AM 6
Posts: 2293; Member since: Feb 14, 2011
It would be quite easy for Android to become 64-bit capable since it is based on Linux which has been 64-bit capable for a while now. To sum it up better: "Android uses a virtual machine in which apps are run, so only the Dalvik VM will need to be updated to 64-bit. Existing apps aren’t likely going to need any changes at all." http://pocketnow.com/2013/10/0
posted on Dec 19, 2013, 1:07 PM 2
Posts: 225; Member since: Oct 10, 2013
It will be having 64bit , 16MP camera and ofcourse 2K screen . but there will huge wrap on design but i doubt it will be metal but it will surely something better. only question is now is will the 64bit exynos will be 14nm or 20nm ? will they include FDD lte and TDD lte on this chip ? ( both together as china and india will be using TDD lte )
posted on Dec 19, 2013, 6:43 AM 4
Posts: 290; Member since: May 03, 2012
2k amoled could be possible. And there wouldn't be a significant difference between 13mp and 16mp samsung cams. And metal body usually implies a unibody design or a non-removable battery, which is not Samsung's style.
posted on Dec 19, 2013, 7:54 AM 3
Posts: 3718; Member since: Nov 03, 2012
This is not S5 for sure as it should have score atleast near to Note 3 (31k+), where G2 has 35k+ AnTuTu score.
posted on Dec 19, 2013, 6:17 AM 2
Posts: 574; Member since: Aug 20, 2012
Same overclocked old SoC architecture from Qualcomm.
posted on Dec 19, 2013, 6:37 AM 2
Still can't impress me after I saw Vivo Xplay 3S with almost the same spec, beautiful metal body, beautiful UI, but only costs $580. *cough* Samsung rapes your wallet *cough*
posted on Dec 19, 2013, 7:01 AM 1
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):