x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.

Samsung SGH-X620 User Reviews

Post new review

Please note that each user review reflects the opinion of its respectful author and not of Phone Arena.

Jaimin
posted on 03 Sep 2006, 10:22

6

Mobile

This mobile sucks And its a crap cell phone. It is worst mobile in the whole world. It has no facilities and the infared is screwed up. it cant take the formats of even a wallpaper.IT IS RUBBISH!!!!

Design 6/10
Features 6/10
Sound Quality 6/10
Signal Strength 6/10
Value for money 6/10

1 out of 2 people found this review helpful. Do you?

Report

abc
posted on 02 Jul 2006, 17:39

6.6

good enough but keys not easy to use

the c key is not good both in terms of design and use... it is small and when we press on it the down arrow is pressed many times. and it is a lack to make disabled the photo sending via infrared light... we just send the phonebook but what about the photos? also battery is not powerful, do not you see Nokia?
its battery duration for a normal use is about 5-7 days but for samsung x620 just 3 days...

Design 8/10
Features 5/10
Sound Quality 5/10
Signal Strength 9/10
Value for money 6/10

0 out of 1 people found this review helpful. Do you?

Report

Nagarajan
posted on 07 Nov 2005, 21:33

7.8

SGH-X620 - Value for money??

Before SGH-X620, I was using Nokia 3120 which was a basic 4K colour model with GPRS The set looks very impressive and it fits snugly. It has its own ups and downs and I will first deal with the downsides of the set.

To start with, there is no direct access to the phone entries in one single step. It requires a minimum of three steps before you have a look at the desired entry. Moreover, the entries from SIM can only be copied on to the phone memory but not moved. The dialing fonts are of big size but unfortunately there is no provision to reduce the size. The ‘C' button for going back to the previous menu or deleting an entry is inconveniently place and one has to use his/her nails to operate them. The icon for ‘Phone settings' in the main menu is misleading as this is not represented by the usual ‘spanner & hammer' symbol. In fact I spent nearly half-an-hour to finally connect the icon with ‘Phone Settings'. The ‘alarm' feature has only three default tones to choose from and one cannot choose a tone of his/her choice from the ringtones. There are quiet a few default melodies which cannot be deleted. These tones are somewhat jarring and unnecessarily eat up the memory space. I also feel that the volume of the ringtones is a bit low and on a busy street one is sure to miss one or two calls. The phone misses out on some of the popular features of other brands, namely Profiles(silent, discreet, sound etc.) and customisation of keys. The ‘profiles' feature allows...  

Design 8/10
Features 7/10
Sound Quality 7/10
Signal Strength 9/10
Value for money 8/10

0 out of 2 people found this review helpful. Do you?

Report

PRIYANKA
posted on 15 Oct 2005, 11:32

8.8

Fabulous Model

I have this model and it's brilliant
I suppose i'm the first one to buy it.
enjoy!!!well it's got everything.The FM is awesome.
It's sound recorder is the best.!!!!

Design 10/10
Features 10/10
Sound Quality 8/10
Signal Strength 9/10
Value for money 7/10

1 out of 2 people found this review helpful. Do you?

Report
You must be a registered user to post a user review

Latest stories