x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Home
  • News
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 3 vs Apple iPhone 5: first look

Samsung Galaxy Note 3 vs Apple iPhone 5: first look

Samsung Galaxy Note 3 vs Apple iPhone 5: first look

One is nearly at the end of its product cycle, while the other is just embarking on its journey very soon – it’s our first look between the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 and the Apple iPhone 5. Samsung surely made headlines after announcing its latest phablet, and after the festivities of yesterday’s big launch event, the Note 3 is yet another offering in Sammy’s portfolio that’s vying to take down the iPhone 5 from its perched top spot, where it has remained steadily at the top of the ladder, untouched by both newcomers and veterans alike.

Design

Painstakingly obvious, there’s a noticeable size disparity between these two prized smartphones. The Note 3 is simply one beast of a smartphone when it comes to sheer size, making it the more unwieldy device to hold in one hand – whereas the iPhone 5 is significantly smaller, thus, making it the easier of the two to grasp. At the same time, there’s more of a solid construction and premium element attached to the iPhone 5’s design, which continues to prove itself as the more attractive device. Well, the Note 3 changes the pace with its slightly more sophisticated choice of materials, a faux-leather casing, but as a whole, it’s still a plastic device underneath it all. When all is said and done, the two handsets appeal in many ways – some will prefer the large size of the Note 3, while others enjoy the compact and premium feel of the iPhone 5.

Display
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 vs Apple iPhone 5
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 vs Apple iPhone 5
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 vs Apple iPhone 5
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 vs Apple iPhone 5

Samsung Galaxy Note 3 vs Apple iPhone 5


Sorry iPhone 5, even though its 4-inch Retina display produces some of the most realistic colors on any display out there, as a whole, it’s being outclassed by the larger screen of the Note 3. First there’s the matter of resolution, which the Note 3 stands out more for its higher resolution of 1280 x 1920 – whereas with the iPhone 5, it’s just 640 x 1136 pixels. Secondly, when big screens are all the rage nowadays, the Note 3’s immense 5.7-inch Super AMOLED display makes the 4-inch Retina display of the iPhone 5 look miniscule – plus, the size of the Note 3’s display is a great conversational piece with random strangers. And finally, the oversaturated colors produced by the Super AMOLED panel of Sammy’s newest prodigy gives it that iridescent glow in the dark to really catch the attention of people. Then again, the iPhone 5’s Retina display has always been a strong showing outdoors when it comes to visibility with the sun present.

Interface

Let’s lay this one down very quickly for all of you folks. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3’s TouchWiz Nature UX experience running on top of Android 4.3 Jelly Bean is one feature filled thing than the iOS 6 experience of the iPhone 5, but it’s the iPhone 5 that proves to have the easier learning curve. Armed with an arsenal of features that rely on its new S-Pen, it’s wonderful that the Note 3 really focuses on being a note-taking centric device – something that would naturally appease business professionals who are on the go. Heck, drawers and artists will also appreciate what the S-Pen can do for them. However, seeing that there’s so much to know and learn with the Note 3’s experience, it can potentially come off as being too overwhelming by other people. Alas, that’s where the iPhone 5 comes into mind, as its iOS 6 experience is so darn easy to navigate around and operate – allowing even first timers to quickly adapt.

Processor and memory

Again, there’s a bit of a disparity between these two when we look at their respective processors. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is being manufactured using the 2.3GHz quad-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 chipset or 1.9GHz Exynos 5 Octa core processor – with both being stuffed with 3GB of RAM. Not surprisingly, it seems so much better on paper than the iPhone 5’s 1.3GHz dual-core Apple A6 processor coupled with 1GB of RAM. As we’ve come to realize, specs don’t always dictate the real world performance, and as we briefly look at the two, we’ll say that they perform evenly with some basic functions.

Storage wise, we can’t help but think about that handy dandy microSD card slot that’s available with the Note 3, which will be offered in both 32GB and 64GB capacities. In contrast, the iPhone 5 lacks any expandable storage, but it’s available in 16GB, 32GB, and 64GB flavors.

Camera

Hey, hey! The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 shares the same camera in use with the Galaxy S4, so it’s almost certain that it’ll produce the same crisp results. However, until we actually snap our own photos and videos, we can’t pass a whole lot of judgment on its 13-megapixel auto-focus camera. Still, the 8-megapixel iSight camera of the iPhone 5 has already established itself as a top contender in the photo and video shooting departments – so it’ll be intriguing to see how Sammy’s latest pride and joy can stack up against it.


Expectations

Here’s the thing, the iPhone 5 has already established itself as the most popular smartphone right now, as it targets a broad range of consumers. On top of that, it continues to perform handsomely in the midst of new competition that’s always trying to trump it. With the Samsung Galaxy Note 3, it might not appeal to the same general mass of people that the iPhone 5 manages to succeed in capturing, but we still can’t count it out how much more extensive it is in terms of pure hardware specs and its software experience. In fact, the S-Pen alone is something that is unique to the Galaxy Note series – something that can’t be replicated by the iPhone 5.




63 Comments
  • Options
    Close




posted on 05 Sep 2013, 12:17 17

1. rallyguy (Posts: 574; Member since: 13 Mar 2012)


What a crappy totally biased article. I have no interest in reading another article by John V. Thanks for wasting my time.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 12:22 5

5. DukeX (Posts: 327; Member since: 28 Aug 2013)


Then go tp BGR or Gizmondo. Those guys are way worse

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 20:42 1

55. InspectorGadget80 (Posts: 6736; Member since: 26 Mar 2011)


oh hell no not BGR i stop going to their website two years ago ever since one of their BIAS reporter saying the 1st GALAXY NOTE is TOO BIG for him. only one i can actually go too now and days is phonedog.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 12:28 4

7. rawbow (Posts: 428; Member since: 30 Mar 2012)


praise Apple for anything and its biased? They should make you the president for your pro Samsung comments as it will be so unbiased right?

Note 3 hands down is the best phone that android can have but please do tell us about this article. What do you think in this article is biased. As far as I am concerned, it's true.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 13:24 13

29. rallyguy (Posts: 574; Member since: 13 Mar 2012)


So calling out a biased article makes me pro Samsung?

No unlike many, including possibly you, I call it as I see it. What in my comment is pro Samsung? If you can't see it then you are blind. The article is biased from start to finish. I assume you are pro Apple with your blind backing?

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 14:30 1

37. bigstrudel (Posts: 518; Member since: 20 Aug 2012)


This is just like the Lumia commercials.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 22:24 1

58. gamblor77 (Posts: 75; Member since: 26 Apr 2012)


The article is biased because they chose to compare the Note 3 to a completely out-classed, irrelevant phone that children and grandparents use. He is seriously reaching just to keep iPhone in the headlines when it's really a useless dinosaur with 1/10 of the functionality. "Hey look at me guys! My phone is still cool... RIGHT?" :O Give me a break! IPhone 5 is a year old and may as well be 7 years old because it hasn't changed since the original.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 12:30 12

8. MistB (Posts: 581; Member since: 07 Jul 2012)


It's true, I can't personally get myself to like John's reviews with his smugness always putting down whomever faces the IPhone, yes i use an Apple as well but he and Alan F/Ray S always have their way to put the IPhone over fresher and superior offerings. The language he uses is so blatantly favouring the Apple product no matter what.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 20:46 1

56. InspectorGadget80 (Posts: 6736; Member since: 26 Mar 2011)


you should take a look at the baised review from RAY S. when he called the XPERIA Z1 a expensive handset and not even talking bout the 20mp camera on the back. pff. PA need too hire new writers getting sick and tired of baised journalist here.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 12:50 3

12. LetsBeHonest (Posts: 1022; Member since: 04 Jun 2013)


I didn't see any bias in article. They just pointed out some iPhone 5's pros, like great outdoor visibility and smooth experience on dual core cpu (less powerful cpu compared to note 3).
But i prefer note 3 over iPhone 5 or even 5s.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 12:54 16

15. PAPINYC (banned) (Posts: 2315; Member since: 30 Jul 2011)


I didn't have to read it, I could tell it was biased just by the graphic: firstly, he semi obstructs Samsung's name (which is its' logo) and, then, puts in an iLLegitimate iPhone 5 with an "AFTERMARKET" warranty-voiding-AppleCare backplate.

TALK ABOUT TRULY UNPROFESSIONAL; didn't even have to look at the reporter (if you can call it that).

Reporting = Objectivity!
Not, oh my favorite iDevice is gonna' look "owned" next to that Samsung Beast!"

He'll probably ban me for this .. 3, 2, 1, ½, ¼, ⅛

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 13:13 14

24. SuperAndroidEvo (Posts: 4416; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)


He also said that the iPhone 5 is better in direct sun light, like if he was able to take the Samsung Galaxy Note III outside & ACTUALLY TEST this. lol

Yeah I may have to agree with you here, that was a bit sketchy at best.

+1

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 13:38 7

33. PAPINYC (banned) (Posts: 2315; Member since: 30 Jul 2011)


Thank god I didn't waste my time with that true rubbish, it would have been 60 seconds of my precious life that I would never have gotten back. Who wrote the "article" (I use that word everso loosely here, looser than Kim Kardashian at a High School Football game - 10 years or so ago)??

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 13:57 4

35. SuperAndroidEvo (Posts: 4416; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)


lol That's funny. I plead the 5th.

PAPINYC, that white Samsung Galaxy Note III is ULTRA HOT right?

I think that's the one I am going to GET. My wife is going to get my rooted HTC Droid DNA the VERY moment I buy this SEXY, SEXY piece of marvelous technology.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 15:21

43. PAPINYC (banned) (Posts: 2315; Member since: 30 Jul 2011)


I've got the white Note II, tres sexy but so is the titanium so, it boils down to personal style; something the iHaveNots 5S folks no nothing about. The more I watch the Unpacked Event E2, the more I'm thinking of getting the Note 3; I haven't finished watching it though, between errands, gym & subway (good thing I downloaded it from Youtube - something the writer of this (let's call it "piece") has no experience in doing since his favorite phone doesn't let him download more than 25MB per iDownload. Anyway, iDiGress, my dilemma: do I have my phone "stolen" [again] and spend the money for another deductible and then use the sale of [hypothetically] my 3 Galaxy Note II's or do I go straight for the Note 3 and only use the sale of two of those hypothetical devices to leverage my purchase?? Hypothetically speaking, of course :D

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 15:29

44. k1ng617 (Posts: 264; Member since: 13 Oct 2009)


He had to have the iPhone over the Note 3 cuz if he did it in reverse the iPhone would simply disappear!

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 13:51 8

34. AnTuTu (Posts: 971; Member since: 14 Oct 2012)


Comneon Johhhhnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn Vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv from iPhonearena

Please don't embarrass Note 3 by comparing it with Fruit 5.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 15:55

48. PunyPoop (Posts: 741; Member since: 18 Jan 2013)


Do the review, I think you know what's best ;)

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 20:41 2

54. InspectorGadget80 (Posts: 6736; Member since: 26 Mar 2011)


hey what do u expect by a ifan from John V. just like RAY S. Iphonearena have alot of bias journalist. they don't like big size screens saying its TOO BIG too put in the pocket or in your hand

posted on 06 Sep 2013, 01:44 1

61. nasznjoka (Posts: 360; Member since: 05 Oct 2012)


hey stop with that iPhonearena! Its long gone! There's no bias after all its just his 'own' opinion so don't take it seriously if you perceive it as bias!

posted on 06 Sep 2013, 00:35 1

60. imran86 (Posts: 46; Member since: 14 Sep 2012)


Everytime I see John V's name on an article, I close it right away as I know he is on rotten apple payroll. He should be banned from being a tech journalist for 100 years.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 12:18 12

2. ottje (Posts: 22; Member since: 18 Dec 2012)


haha looks like a mother and her baby

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 12:57 7

17. PAPINYC (banned) (Posts: 2315; Member since: 30 Jul 2011)


You do mean mother and her embryo, don't you??

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 12:19 26

3. McLTE (Posts: 714; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)


"premium element attached to the iPhone 5’s design, which continues to prove itself as the more attractive device"

I am SO freaking tired of hearing this statement. Attractive is measured by how it looks.

If you LOOK at the devices, how could one possibly say "oh yeah.. the iPhone clearly is more attractive". Most phones these days look very similar.. a rounded corner here or there, beveled glass.. blah blah.

If you showed these 2 phones to someone who had never seen a phone, I bet they'd say they booth look about the same on the attractive scale.. it's a brick shaped phone with rounded corners.

And...

"but as a whole, it’s still a plastic device underneath it all" That doesn't need to be communicated as a negative. Many of us LIKE the fact that our Notes or GS phones are plastic, light and durable. If my Note was made like an iPhone, it'd weigh 5 lbs!

I swear the writers at PA have lost (or never had) any ability to be OBJECTIVE. They riddle the reviews and first looks with their own slant on what constitutes a quality phone.

Guess what.. BOTH are quality phones.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 15:51 2

47. SGSatlantis (Posts: 205; Member since: 20 Jul 2011)


Please let me continue your rant...

"...the Note 3 is yet another offering in Sammy’s portfolio that’s vying to take down the iPhone 5 from its perched top spot, where it has remained steadily at the top of the ladder, untouched by both newcomers and veterans alike."

And basically, this is a LIE! The S4 sold more than the iPhone 5 worldwide last quarter. What top spot? What ladder?

"...Android 4.3 Jelly Bean is one feature filled thing than the iOS 6 experience of the iPhone 5, but it’s the iPhone 5 that proves to have the easier learning curve."

This is only a good thing if you are over 60. Sure you can remove all those features to make it easier to use, but than you'll end up with a phone not a smartphone. Get it?

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 20:48 2

57. InspectorGadget80 (Posts: 6736; Member since: 26 Mar 2011)


yeah watch when the same iPhone 5s launch they say its the most beautiful phone in the world now covered in gold. just wait n see what they say then. com on PA fired your bias articles. i think we should all leave PA and have them less n less readers then they would shut down their website. i'd say we should protest agianst BIASED journalist to get rid of them

posted on 06 Sep 2013, 19:08

63. darkkjedii (Posts: 12618; Member since: 05 Feb 2011)


You're an idiot, and can't even form correct paragraph's. PA is a tech site, and a business, they're not going to try to satisfy only a certain demographic. You better be careful, before you find yourself banned for trying to incite a protest. Stop starting sentences with lowercase letters "too". That's the correct use of "too".

posted on 06 Sep 2013, 05:16

62. RH234 (Posts: 15; Member since: 21 Aug 2013)


Check out his Moto X-Note 3 comparison. It's even worse

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 12:21 15

4. ajac09 (Posts: 1367; Member since: 30 Sep 2009)


omg iphonareana at its best

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 12:27 16

6. McLTE (Posts: 714; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)


I re-read the whole article again and I can honestly say that was one of the worst articles I've ever seen written here at PA.

Did Apple pay you to write that? Bash on the design of the Note 3, but for every key feature or spec, throw something in about how Apple is established or good enough.. wow.

I'm dumbfounded by the poor writing here at times.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 12:52

13. SonyXperiaNexus (Posts: 374; Member since: 01 Oct 2012)


idk, it seems OK to me. It didnt look like he was taking sides and if he was, it was the note 3's in most places while pointing out that i5 isnt THAT bad.
P.S. How many times are we gonna see the i5 raped by every new phone turn by turn? it seems pointless to do an i5 comparison to me, just sayin

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 13:13 12

23. McLTE (Posts: 714; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)


Read it again.. and look for how the tone of the whole article is..

To me anyway, it's clearly a piece written to coddle the iPhone.. It's ok little iPhone.. you're still good enough! Yes, the Note 3 has "XX" or "YY".. but you still are good to! Don't cry!

I do agree with you... These 2 phones have NO business being in a direct comparison

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 14:47 4

39. -Shadow- (Posts: 26; Member since: 26 Mar 2013)


even worse, is John V. the most unbiased PA writer .I would've expected this from Ray or Michael but... very disappointed of John.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 12:36 9

9. 1113douglas (Posts: 192; Member since: 04 Jul 2013)


These phones should not be compared. You are comparing the newest and most powerful smartphone in the world vs the year old iPhone 5. The galaxy s3 beat the iPhone 5. Sorry but this is not worth watching who in the world would buy an iPhone over this.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 13:03 7

19. Googler (Posts: 813; Member since: 10 Jun 2013)


They are comparing the newest and most powerful phablet against a phone 1 year old that only has a 4" screen is more accurate. Can't even believe they bothered with this comparison, there's so many other phablets that could have been put against each other.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 13:28 2

31. rallyguy (Posts: 574; Member since: 13 Mar 2012)


This was one of my thoughts also. The Note is in a different class of phone or phablet. One is a large phone, one is not. These are two phones that appeal to two different types of people.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 12:40 7

10. JMartin22 (Posts: 1245; Member since: 30 Apr 2013)


It's a talking point of there's to go after a phone that uses plastic (Samsung more aggressively)

I wouldn't exactly call the iPhone 5 premium when it scratches, chips and blemishes very easily. They don't know how to be objective and leave their own subjective points of view out of an article, rather than just being comparative with their offerings and functional capabilities.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 12:48

11. Mxyzptlk (Posts: 4165; Member since: 21 Apr 2012)


A BMW can scratch relatively easy and yet it's premium. IPhone 5 is still the better phone.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 12:55 10

16. LetsBeHonest (Posts: 1022; Member since: 04 Jun 2013)


Only if you consider note 3 as a phablet.
iPhone 5 is great device but note 3 wins this fight. May be iPhone 5s comes par with note 3 but not the iPhone 5

but iPhone 5 still can be better phone for you if you dislike Android and if iPhone satisfy your needs
it's just a matter of personal preference.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 13:16 7

26. McLTE (Posts: 714; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)


If BMW came out with body panels made of an alternative material such as plastic, would you suddenly cry that the car is garbage and clearly not premium?

Sorry, but premium is not measured by build quality alone.. it's the entire experience and in that area Apple has been matched and passed by.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 13:24 9

30. amilcarmz86 (Posts: 95; Member since: 09 Jul 2013)


PA please bring the thumb down button again...

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 12:52

14. tedkord (Posts: 5261; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)


I didn't think it was an overly biased article. He gave a few points to each.

However, the writing, sentence structure, etc...were atrocious. Now I'm going to assume the the author speaks English as a second language, and it's admirable that he speaks more than one language , but isn't there any editorial process at PA?

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 13:03 5

20. PAPINYC (banned) (Posts: 2315; Member since: 30 Jul 2011)


Yeah, just wait until that iPhone 5S is unveiled, they'll devote 10 pages of content to the one article summarizing the new model and then Copy & Paste everything from the iPhone 5 and the iPhone 4S' review comparisons, respectively. And, if that's not enough, they'll post 100 articles in 3 days about how miraculously marvelous the iPhone 5S is [in their opinion] … Just wait!

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 13:01

18. intos (Posts: 87; Member since: 06 Jan 2012)


hmmm ... i suspect that the iphone 5 compare to the galaxy note 3 the screen is not so bright cause is not set to the highest level...

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 13:06 14

21. softfurryanus (banned) (Posts: 232; Member since: 09 Jul 2013)


Ladies and gentleman: I give you the dumbest, most irrelevant comparison of 2013

Really though... maybe it's just me but it's almost at the point where I don't feel that iPhones are even at the same level of the more recent Android flagships, and ESPECIALLY not comparable to a phablet.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 13:18 8

27. McLTE (Posts: 714; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)


I couldn't agree more!

I've found myself no longer considering it the ultimate phone that all others are measured against.. it's just one of a pack of phones for the mid range user.

Definitely not at the top tier for me.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 13:11

22. bucky (Posts: 1574; Member since: 30 Sep 2009)


iPhone takes this one.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 22:37 1

59. gamblor77 (Posts: 75; Member since: 26 Apr 2012)


IPhone takes it in the ass and nothing more.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 13:14 2

25. amilcarmz86 (Posts: 95; Member since: 09 Jul 2013)


tiny little iphone.... paying the article... :D

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 13:23 3

28. McLTE (Posts: 714; Member since: 18 Oct 2011)


Also.. What camera was used to take these pics? Generally speaking, when trying to show off a phone, using razor thin depth of field is not such a good idea. Fail.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 13:31 8

32. Nephylim (Posts: 134; Member since: 04 Apr 2013)


Note 3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>​>> Iphone 5

I don't need be a genius or read John V to know that.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 14:21

36. darkkjedii (Posts: 12618; Member since: 05 Feb 2011)


The note 3 is great n all, but the back is hideous. It looks like a BBall shoe. Anyways it wins this from a sheer specs comparison. I'm keeping my note 2 though, and copping a 5S.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 14:49 1

40. Googler (Posts: 813; Member since: 10 Jun 2013)


I gotta agree with that, the stitching affect looks off. If I pick one of these up, first thing I'm doing (even before pulling the trigger on this) is Google a new backing for it, preferably a metal one.

In comparison, the original N7 backing was the best. Miss that on the newer version, the slight change makes it more slick to hold, not like how the older backing had that stay in place hold feel to it.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 15:17

42. darkkjedii (Posts: 12618; Member since: 05 Feb 2011)


Good post

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 15:42 1

46. PAPINYC (banned) (Posts: 2315; Member since: 30 Jul 2011)


That's not the only thing you're probably "copping" - what's wrong with Basketball?? Don't tell me you can't "Jump"??

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 16:20

50. tedkord (Posts: 5261; Member since: 17 Jun 2009)


for less than $10 you can have any kind of back you want on the note 3 from Amazon.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 19:17

53. darkkjedii (Posts: 12618; Member since: 05 Feb 2011)


That's good to know Ted, thanx for the info. I'm not a basher, you know that. I'm simply stating my opinion...I do not like the stitched leathery back. They shoulda followed the s4 back, which is gorgeous.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 14:42 1

38. SonyFindOneDroidple (Posts: 501; Member since: 11 May 2013)


Cmon.. i never thought that IPHONE 5 IS THE TOP CONTENDER AND STILL UNBEATEN BY THE 1080P FLAGSHIPS OF ANDROID.. I would even want to have a Note2, S3, One X, Xperia TX, HTC Butterfly, G Pro etc than ip5! And as i remember, Gs4 held to be the best camera in many comparisons here in PA, just recently been outclassed by the mighty G2.

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 15:13 2

41. Naytess (Posts: 17; Member since: 08 Jun 2010)


I'd like to make a recommendation to the writers/reviewers of PA...

I'm waiting for one of these phone info/review sites to take a different approach to reviewing cell phones. I REALLY am not interested in (& very tired of) reading phone reviews or phone comparisons by reviewers who believe the phone they're reviewing or comparing is inferior to their own phone/OS of choice...even if they happen to be right (which is not typically the case here at PA).

Here's what I AM interested in: I'd like to know what an Android user "likes" or "dislikes" about a new Android phone. Or, what a phablet (a term I still can't stand to use) user "likes" or "dislikes" about the Note III, or HTC One Max, etc. Or, what an iphone user "likes" or "dislikes" about the new iphone iteration. THEN what would be great is to read a dialogue/discussion between an Android user and an iphone user, &/or BB user, &/or Windows Phone user, etc discussing what they "like" and "dislike" about the new phone they're reviewing/comparing. At that point, any bias would be expected, and perhaps even appropriate...not to mention "balanced". I like the idea of people reviewing phones who wouldn't normally go for said phone. But, I'd also like to hear from those who WOULD go for said phone.

In short, consider taking a "multiple reviewers with multiple preferences discussion" approach to reviewing/comparing phones. Merely reading why a [enter cell phone make/model/OS of preference here] user holds the non-objective opinion that his year old phone can still contend with a brand new offering is so damn tired.

Just my $0.02

P.S. Note III FTW by TKO ;^{D>

posted on 05 Sep 2013, 15:34

45. good2great (Posts: 1040; Member since: 22 Feb 2012)


haha... all the sore bottoms in here... hehe

PA you guys are geniuses!!!

sure know how to anger your reader android klan...lol

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories