iPhone 17 vs iPhone 16e: The best value iPhone in years vs the cheapest

0comments
We may earn a commission if you make a purchase from the links on this page.
Person holding a green dual-camera iPhone and a white single-camera iPhone side by side.

Intro


The iPhone 17 has entered the stage with a bunch of upgrades that fans were waiting for. Among those, the most important ones are a smoother 120Hz ProMotion display, a sharper 48 MP ultrawide camera, and faster wired charging.

But you might be asking yourself: how does it stack up against Apple's latest more budget phone, the iPhone 16e? Apple’s new budget-friendly model launched last year at $599 and still offers flagship performance, long battery life, and most importantly an affordable entry point into the iPhone ecosystem.

If you already own the iPhone 16e, or if you’re choosing between these two iPhones today, the big question is whether the iPhone 17’s upgrades are worth the extra $200.

To find out, we put both phones through our in-house tests for battery life, camera performance, display quality, and chip performance. We also spent time some time with these devices to see how they perform in real life. In this detailed comparison, we’ll share our results and help you decide which phone is the smarter choice for your needs.

iPhone 17: $0.00/mo. at Verizon

$0 /mo
$23 05
$23 off (100%)
Get the iPhone 17 and enjoy improved design, better battery life, and top-tier performance. Right now, you can get the phone for $0.00/mo. with Unlimited Welcome, Unlimited Plus or Unlimited Ultimate plan.
Buy at Verizon

iPhone Air: $0.00/mo. at Verizon

$0 /mo
$27 77
$28 off (100%)
The slimmest iPhone is here! You can now buy the powerful iPhone Air at Verizon for $0.00/mo. with a new line activation on select Unlimited plans and a trade-in. This is an online-only offer.
Buy at Verizon

iPhone 16e: $0.00/mo. with new line activation

$0
$599 99
$600 off (100%)
The iPhone 16e is available for $600 off over 36 promo credits with a new line activation at Verizon. You must activate an Unlimited Plus or Unlimited Ultimate plan to take advantage.
Buy at Verizon


iPhone 17 vs iPhone 16e differences:


7.7
Apple iPhone 17
6.6
Apple iPhone 16e
5.9
7.6
6.8
6.1
7.6
8.6
8.5
8
8.2
8
8
10
Battery Life
Photo Quality
Video Quality
Charging
Performance Heavy
Performance Light
Display Quality
Design
Wireless Charging
Biometrics
Audio
Software
6.1
5.6
4.1
4.9
6.2
6.4
8
8
5.7
8
7
10

Table of Contents:

Also read:

Design and Display Quality

Premium vs entry-level build


The iPhone 16e carries over the older flat-edged design, resembling the iPhone 14. It uses an aluminum frame with glass on the front and back and features Ceramic Shield only on the front. So, it is still a durable phone, but it has thicker bezels, and it lacks some of the refinements that you will find with the iPhone 17.

The iPhone 17 looks and feels more premium. It has slimmer bezels around its larger 6.3-inch display and introduces Ceramic Shield 2 on the front, which Apple claims is three times more scratch-resistant. The back sticks to reinforced glass rather than Ceramic Shield 2, keeping some differentiation from the Pro line.


As for size, the iPhone 17 is slightly taller, thicker, and heavier.



Looks-wise, the iPhone 17 colors are:
  • Black
  • Lavender
  • Mist Blue
  • Sage
  • White


And the iPhone 16e colors are simply:
  • Black
  • White


The iPhone 16e uses a 6.1-inch OLED with a standard 60Hz refresh rate and up to 1200 nits peak brightness. It’s a big step up from the LCD screens of past budget iPhones, but it still feels dated in 2025.

The iPhone 17, on the other hand, finally gives the base iPhone a 120Hz ProMotion OLED panel with adaptive refresh from 1 Hz to 120 Hz (enabling the Always-On display feature). It’s also much brighter, peaking at 3000 nits outdoors and 1600 nits in HDR, which is a huge jump over the 16e, making it easier to use in direct sunlight.

Apple has added a seven-layer anti-reflective coating to the iPhone 17 displays.

It does not match the Galaxy S25 Ultra’s stronger treatment, but in MrWhoseTheBoss’s hands-on comparison, the improvement over the iPhone 16 series is clearly visible.

Display Measurements:



The iPhone 17’s display is in a different league. Our tests show peak brightness above 2600 nits, compared to under 800 nits on the 16e, making it vastly easier to use outdoors. Add to that ProMotion 120Hz for smoother scrolling and gaming, and the 17 completely outclasses the 16e’s 60Hz, dimmer panel.

Performance and Software

A19 vs A18: AI-ready vs cost-focused


The iPhone 16e is no slouch with the A18 chip, which is the same processor found in the iPhone 16. Paired with 8 GB RAM, it delivers flagship-grade performance at a much lower price point.

The iPhone 17 steps things up, though, with the new A19 chip, built on TSMC’s 3nm process. It’s more efficient and optimized for sustained performance, especially in longer gaming or creative sessions. Both models come with 8 GB RAM, but things are different when it comes to storage: the iPhone 16e starts at 128 GB, while the iPhone 17 doubles that to 256 GB base storage.

Recommended Stories


On the software side, both run iOS 26, which introduces:
  • The new Liquid Glass design language
  • Call Screening for the Phone app
  • Live Translate during calls
  • Smarter Messages with custom chat backgrounds and polls
  • Visual Intelligence features like instant object recognition and dual-camera video capture

Apple Intelligence is available on both, but the most advanced features like the smarter Siri are still on hold until at least 2026.

CPU Performance Benchmarks:


Geekbench 6
SingleHigher is better
Apple iPhone 173527
Apple iPhone 16e3166
Geekbench 6
MultiHigher is better
Apple iPhone 178798
Apple iPhone 16e7763


The iPhone 17’s A19 chip is not that far ahead of the A18 in the iPhone 16e. In Geekbench, single-core scores are 3527 vs 3166, which is about a 11% higher. Multi-core performance sees a similar in size improvement, moving from 7763 to 8798, or roughly a 13%.

GPU Performance:


3DMark Extreme(High)Higher is better
Apple iPhone 175172
Apple iPhone 16e3017
3DMark Extreme(Low)Higher is better
Apple iPhone 173295
Apple iPhone 16e2495

There is a more obvious jump in performance when it comes to graphics. In 3DMark Extreme (High), the iPhone 17 scores 5172, which is way ahead of the 16e’s 3017 (nearly a 70% difference). On the sustained (Low) run, the iPhone 17 also holds up better with 3295 versus 2495. This suggests much stronger gaming performance and less throttling under extended loads, making the iPhone 17 better choice for graphics-heavy tasks by far.

Camera

iPhone 17 adds sharper selfie cam and a flagship-grade ultrawide


The iPhone 16e is Apple’s most stripped-down modern iPhone when it comes to cameras. On the back, it has a single 48 MP main camera that still delivers impressive image quality. It supports Smart HDR, Night Mode, and 4K Dolby Vision video recording, but it lacks the versatility that comes with multiple lenses. There’s no ultrawide for landscapes or macro shots, and no telephoto for higher-quality zoom.

On the front, the iPhone 16e retains the familiar 12 MP selfie camera used in previous models. It supports Portrait Mode and 4K video, but compared to the iPhone 17’s new 18 MP front camera, it will likely capture less detail and sharpness, particularly in low-light scenes.

Besides its new selfie camera, the iPhone 17 also comes with:
  • A 48 MP main camera with a larger quad-pixel sensor that helps create better dynamic range and capture more light in dark conditions.
  • A brand-new 48 MP ultrawide camera, replacing the older 12 MP one (defaults to 24 MP). This upgrade brings along not only sharper ultrawide photos but also much better macro photography, as that's the camera that iPhones use for macro.
  • The new 18 MP Center Stage selfie camera that debuted with the iPhone 17 has a new square-sensor design that gives you sharper detail for selfies and video calls, and the wider field of view makes it better for group shots. It comes with Center Stage, which allows the camera to follow you during video calls.  The camera also uses AI to automatically adjusts framing for group selfies. Thanks to the sensor's square design, you don't have to turn your phone sideways when you want to take a horizontal shot.

The Camera Control button remains exclusive to the more premium model (not that it's a big loss), but the AI-based Visual Intelligence features are available between both phones.

PhoneArena Camera Score:


Photo
Video
Phone Camera
Score
Photo
Score
Main
(wide)
Ultra
Wide
Selfie Zoom
Apple iPhone 17 150 156 84 24 28 21
Apple iPhone 16e 118 128 81 N/A 26 22
Phone Camera
Score
Video
Score
Main
(wide)
Ultra
Wide
Selfie Zoom
Apple iPhone 17 150 145 77 23 26 18
Apple iPhone 16e 118 107 66 N/A 25 15
Find out more details about photo and video scores for all phones we have tested on our PhoneArena Camera Score page

As expected, the iPhone 17 leaves the 16e in the dust in our tests. It scores much higher in both photo and video, thanks to its dual-camera system with an ultrawide. The 16e’s single rear shooter feels limiting, and the 17 gives you more flexibility and higher quality.

Main Camera


Invalid image meta


Besides the slightly different white balance, you will find it difficult to notice any differences between the iPhone 17's maind camera and the one on the iPhone 16e

Zoom Quality




Since both phones use sensor crop to zoom in, the differences when using the 2x mode are the same as those in regular 1x mode.

Ultra-wide Camera




As mentioned, the 16e does not have an ultrawide camera, which means it cannot get image angles like the one above. An ultrawide camera can come in handy when you want to capture more in the image but don't have enough space to move back.

Selfies


Invalid image meta


Selfies look rather similar between the two phones, despite the new 18 MP on the iPhone 17

More Camera Samples


Invalid image meta


Video Quality


Video Thumbnail

Battery Life and Charging

Bigger battery vs faster charging


The iPhone 16e packs a larger 4,005mAh battery compared to the iPhone 17’s 3,692mAh cell. However, thanks to its more efficient chip and stacked battery design, the iPhone 17 still delivers noticeably longer battery life.

Charging is another area where the iPhone 17 comes out ahead. It supports up to 40W wired charging (Apple claims 50% in about 20 minutes), 25W MagSafe/Qi2 wireless charging, and even 4.5W reverse wired charging. The iPhone 16e, by contrast, is limited to 20W wired (50% in 30 minutes) and 7.5W wireless, with no MagSafe magnets or reverse charging support.

PhoneArena Battery and Charging Test Results:


Battery Life
Charging
Phone Battery Life
estimate
Browsing Video Gaming
Apple iPhone 17
3692 mAh
6h 13min 16h 47min 7h 19min 9h 12min
Apple iPhone 16e
4005 mAh
6h 4min 17h 27min 6h 59min 7h 45min
Phone Full Charging 30 min Charge
Wired Wireless Wired Wireless
Apple iPhone 17
3692 mAh
1h 16min Untested 67% Untested
Apple iPhone 16e
4005 mAh
1h 41min 4h 54min 47% 8%
Find out more details about battery and charging for all phones we have tested on our PhoneArena Battery Score page

Despite having a slightly smaller cell, the iPhone 17 matches the 16e thanks to the more efficient A19 chip and stacked battery design. Charging is also dramatically faster: 67% in 30 minutes vs just 47% on the 16e.

Audio Quality and Haptics


Audio quality is noticeably better on the iPhone 17, with fuller sound and improved balance. The iPhone 16e sounds flatter and weaker, especially at higher volumes.

When it comes to haptics, both phones feel precise and strong, as you’d expect from Apple.

Specs Comparison


Here's a quick look at the iPhone 17 vs iPhone 16e specs:


Summary



The iPhone 16e is Apple’s most affordable modern iPhone, delivering solid value with A18 performance, a capable main camera, and dependable battery life for $599. Still, it comes with a few clear compromises, including a 60Hz display, single rear camera, slow charging, and no MagSafe support.

The iPhone 17 finally makes the base model feel genuinely premium with its 120Hz ProMotion display, higher-resolution ultrawide camera, faster charging, and larger base storage. At $799, it’s the stronger long-term investment and the more well-rounded phone overall.

If you simply want the most affordable entry into iOS, the iPhone 16e remains a smart buy. But if you’re after a true flagship experience without going Pro, the iPhone 17 is the one to get.

Google News Follow
Follow us on Google News
COMMENTS (0)

Recommended Stories

FCC OKs Cingular\'s purchase of AT&T Wireless