BLU Vivo XL User Reviews

Overall user rating

4.0

The overall rating is the average of all user reviews, while the overall alternatives are the ones that has been listed most.

Build quality
6.0
Text input
9.0
Everyday usage
2.0
UI speed
9.0
Camera
9.0
Multimedia
2.0
Internet
10.0
Call quality
2.0
Battery
10.0
Reception
2.0
Display
10.0
Post new review

Please note that each user review reflects the opinion of its respectful author and not of PhoneArena.

MotoFoner posted on Apr 17, 2016, 2:37 PM
Posts: 34; Member since: May 11, 2015

4.0

Wanted to love it, but worst phone I've handled in years.

MotoFoner has owned it for less than 3 months before publishing this review

I wanted to love this budget screamer with its USB-C, "fake" phone call feature and impressive-looking specs, but came all crashing down after using about 5 minutes. The interface is awful - truly awful - and was forced to immeduately install a different launcher. The "fake call" feature had so much potential, but it greyed out the speakerphone option so it was rendered useless. The coup de grace was teh atrocious, tinny, crackly speaker. It was useless on conference call and thus was rendered unusable for me. I know it's only USD150, but you can get a used Moto X 2014 for that and have a decent, fast phone.

Build quality
6.0
Reception
2.0
Call quality
2.0
Internet
10.0
Multimedia
2.0
Choppy video playback.
Camera
9.0
UI speed
9.0
Everyday usage
2.0
Text input
9.0
Display
10.0
Battery
10.0

6 out of 16 people found this review helpful.

Report
You must be a registered user to post a user review
This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.
FCC OKs Cingular's purchase of AT&T Wireless