Study shows that Samsung phones had the highest failure rate during Q1 2018

Study shows that Samsung phones had the highest failure rate during Q1 2018
The latest "State of Mobile Device Repair & Security" report issued by data security company Blancco, covers the first quarter of this year. According to the research firm, from January through April, Samsung's phones had the highest failure rate among the manufacturers it tracks at 27.4%. At 22%, the Apple iPhone 6 had the highest malfunction rate among iOS devices, followed by the 16% failure rate for the Apple iPhone 6s. Overall, 15.2% of iOS devices failed during the first quarter of 2018 compared to 18.9% of Android models.

That the iPhone 6/6s should have double-digit failure rates shouldn't be surprising. In 2016, the touchscreens on a number of iPhone 6 and iPhone 6s units stopped working, and a horizontal gray bar appeared. Dubbed "Touch Disease," the problem was apparently related to a decision made by Apple not to use an epoxy on the iPhone 6 circuit boards that it had always used in the past.

Apple also started throttling the processing speeds of the Apple iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus, iPhone 6s, iPhone 6s Plus, iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus last year. Depleted batteries in some of these models could not provide the power needed by these phones to handle certain tasks, and that caused affected models to just shut down. Apple fessed up to using the update to iOS 10.2.1 to quietly install the throttling capabilities, and started offering discounted battery replacements as an apology.

While Samsung topped all manufacturers during Q1 with a 27.4% failure rate, Xiaomi was next among Android users with a 14.2% rate. Motorola was third after 9.6% of its devices failed in Q1.

The data was compiled by Blancco using iOS and Android devices handed over to Blancco from carriers and retailers for "testing and erasure." The information found that 74.3% of iOS devices are running iOS 11, while 52% of Android phones are powered by Android Nougat. The latter is one generation behind the most up-to-date Android Oreo build. Here is an amazing stat; nearly the same number of Android users have Oreo installed on their phone (1.3%) as the number running 2010's Android 2.3.x Gingerbread (1.2%)

The biggest performance problems for iOS devices, according to the report, was Bluetooth and Wi-Fi connectivity.  That was followed by problems using a headset (like the absence of a 3.5mm jack) and mobile data. Android issues included problems with the overall performance of handsets, and troubles with the camera, microphone and battery charging. Alarming for Androids users and manufacturers, 34% of Android phones had issues with performance during the first quarter of 2018 compared to 10% during the same quarter of 2017.

source: Blancco



2. NateDiaz

Posts: 1092; Member since: Mar 03, 2018

Defenders in 3..2..1..GO

107. Reybanz88

Posts: 101; Member since: Jul 28, 2016

Is anyone even gonna mention Pic#3 that literally shows iOS failing on average 48% vs Android 24% in the first quarter '18. Do you all see Asia's iOS failure rate! 87% like come on.

4. aegislash

Posts: 1526; Member since: Jan 27, 2015

Quite a shame, really. You'd expect better from the face of Android. The only issue I myself have experienced is having to return my Note7...twice. But other than that mess, none of my Samsung devices have ever *failed*.

7. Xperia14

Posts: 1208; Member since: Sep 01, 2015

I know four people with the S8(+). All four of them have had problems with focussing and a blurry camera, and the fix was to hit the camera. This was actually a common problem. Besides that, two had the battery already being replaced, and the third one also doesn't last long anymore (dies within 6 hours).

14. aegislash

Posts: 1526; Member since: Jan 27, 2015

There's one thing about my Note8 that bugs me. It isn't a performance issue, or even any sort of software doesn't bother me per say, but it appears as if light is bleeding from beneath the left-hand side where the front glass meets the metal frame. Not enough to even notice unless you intentionally put your face up to the phone and look for it, but there's definitely light shining through. Hasn't affected the phone at all since it's been in the water a hundred times and still works like day one...just a cosmetic defect maybe? I did Google it and see that a few others had the same thing happening.

17. Xperia14

Posts: 1208; Member since: Sep 01, 2015

Hm, that's weird as it doesn't use a backlight.. (like my G6, that also suffers from light bleeding).

18. aegislash

Posts: 1526; Member since: Jan 27, 2015 I know this post will be deleted since they hate external links, but there's one thread.

19. Xperia14

Posts: 1208; Member since: Sep 01, 2015

Hm, seems to be caused by a gap between the frame and glass. Not that big of a deal if you ask me.

20. aegislash

Posts: 1526; Member since: Jan 27, 2015

Yeah it's basically nothing. Doesn't affect water resistance or anything sooo.

30. Humanoid

Posts: 1226; Member since: Dec 11, 2017

I thought only lcd had light bleeding. My G Pad has more than 10% of the screen covered

37. Subie

Posts: 2415; Member since: Aug 01, 2015

aegislash, The fourth paragraph is a little misleading in allowing the reader to think that Samsung units have a 27.4% failure rate. This is wrong. The graph that Alan provides actually suggests that of all the failed Android devices 27% of them were Samsung. Given that Samsung sells 300+ million phones per year this is exactly what you should expect. If we were able to compare the amount of devices sold per manufacturer vs the amount of reported failures as well, Samsung's quality rating could look much better than articles like this have lead most of the users commenting here to believe...

5. Mr.Pussy

Posts: 348; Member since: Feb 16, 2017

Samsung have many phones. Do they combined all the phones as 1 big failure. They split Apple 1 for 6 and the other for 6s. I don't get it.

33. uberzero

Posts: 53; Member since: Jul 07, 2018

Good observation. That study failed to mention the name of those models with failure rate for each manufacturer. Additionally, those Android smartphones model from say manufacturers have different updates depending of the carriers further twisting the results as posted on this report. When a study takes account those key factors, then we can discuss.

50. piyath

Posts: 2445; Member since: Mar 23, 2012

27.4% for entire Samsung lineup and 15.2% for entire iPhone lineup, is that so hard to grasp? Again if you wanna compare Operating system wise it's 15.2% for iOS and 18.9% for Android... It's very clear.

53. cmdacos

Posts: 4302; Member since: Nov 01, 2016

15% of 'high end premium' phones vs 18% largely low end phones? Thats a low bar you're setting for apple.

71. Mr.Pussy

Posts: 348; Member since: Feb 16, 2017

What I am reading its said 27.4% for Samsung. 22% for iPhone 6 and 16% for iPhone 6s you bone head. It would be nice if PhoneArena would break it down for Samsung as well then so we all know what to expect.

6. RebelwithoutaClue unregistered

So an overall expensive premium phone fails 15.2% of the time when an overall cheap budget phone fails at 18.9%?

9. toukale

Posts: 662; Member since: Jun 10, 2015

That's the wrong way to look at product failure rates, unless you are a fanatic trying to push some sort of agenda (we are going to leave that one alone). Every man made product is going to failed, the issue is what happened when such product failed. Does the manufacturer honor/stand behind their products, how easy/long did the manufacturer took to resolved the issue. How long did you have to go without the product etc... Those are the things I consider when I buy anything above $50.

31. RebelwithoutaClue unregistered

Haha so funny that you felt the need to reply when I was kidding around

45. piyath

Posts: 2445; Member since: Mar 23, 2012

27.4% Samsung failure doesn't count babe?? Are you so blind to not see the elephant in the

87. RebelwithoutaClue unregistered

So sweet that you felt the need to comment on my joke as well. As I expected you would babe

51. piyath

Posts: 2445; Member since: Mar 23, 2012

Note 8 is $950 so it's not a cheap phone, is it? Pizel 2 xl is $850 is it cheap for you?? Not for me. iPhone 2018 lineup starts at $349, here is the link...

54. cmdacos

Posts: 4302; Member since: Nov 01, 2016

Yes, 950 is cheap for me... Especially when there is value behind that 950. I'm not paying $10 for a dinosaur like phone with a screen full of icons like it's 2007

88. RebelwithoutaClue unregistered

So all those Android phones are expensive phones and not some cheap ass phone?

8. whatev

Posts: 2396; Member since: Oct 28, 2015

Loving android trolls bashing this study but they don’t remember when they were orgasmic when the same company reported some time ago that iOS devices had higher failure rates, love double standards < 333

12. aegislash

Posts: 1526; Member since: Jan 27, 2015

But so far, nobody has bashed the study. What exactly are you complaining about?

26. cmdacos

Posts: 4302; Member since: Nov 01, 2016

Lmao... Pre-emptive strike I suppose hahaha

58. whatev

Posts: 2396; Member since: Oct 28, 2015

I’m not complaining, I just love it, wanna take a look at the comments? :)

83. Cicero

Posts: 1144; Member since: Jan 22, 2014

You better take a look at the graphics posted at the end of article. Than, if you can read a graph, you will understand how misleading is written the article by Alan. Clickbait by Apple lover, Alan.

94. whatev

Posts: 2396; Member since: Oct 28, 2015

Do you understand that even in a hypothetical case where Samsung and Apple had the same failure rate, Samsung would still be worse because android devices are a lot more than iOS ones? Wanna take some math lessons?

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.