WSJ: Zuckerberg tried to buy Snapchat for more than $1 billion

WSJ: Zuckerberg tried to buy Snapchat for more than $1 billion
Mobile messaging service Snapchat  is known for its self-destructing messages. The idea of the Mission Impossible like missive is to send a message that you don't want others stumbling on. The company, which recently raised $60 million at an $800 million valuation, doesn't turn a profit yet, or even generate revenue, but is growing rapidly. Last month, the service processed 350 million "snaps" versus the 200 million it processed in June. Now, the start-up is trying to raise $200 million at a valuation of $3 billion to $4 billion.

The whole story behind Snapchat must have reminded Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg of Instagram. Facebook bought the rapidly growing photo-sharing social networking site last year, for $1 billion in stock. By the time the deal closed, Facebook's shares had declined enough to make the deal worth about $750 million. A report in Friday's Wall Street Journal says that Zuckerberg was trying to get in touch with Snapchat to discuss a $1 billion plus acquisition of Snapchat, but the messaging company's co-founder Evan Spiegel turned him down according to those in the know.

While Zuckerberg can point with pride to the continued growth of Instagram after the acquisition as a reason for Snapchat to give in to a Facebook purchase, apparently the powers that be at Snapchat believe the company is worth more. And who is to say that rebuffing Zukerberg isn't the right move. After all, the company has tripled it's valuation since June and Snapchat could end up being worth much more than what a Facebook acquisition could bring.

The problem with an acquisition of Snapchat would be figuring out how to monetize the company. It took a long time for Facebook to figure out how it might make money on its Instagram purchase. The latter has announced that it will be running ads on the site and the other day, it showed its members what ads will look like on Instagram. Even with the new ads, there is still no guarantee that Facebook will ever turn a profit on Instagram. Considering this, perhaps Snapchat's Spiegel did Facebook a solid by turning down Zuckerberg.

source: WSJ



1. Chris_Bakke

Posts: 246; Member since: Jan 23, 2013

Getting 6 second snaps from companies would be annoying as hell, and there's no guarantee that people would watch them.

2. Sire3008

Posts: 87; Member since: Sep 26, 2013

Mark Z has the money to throw around.. Who knows what he has in mind making those moves

3. woodshop20

Posts: 459; Member since: Sep 14, 2013

Facebook for Android sucks. It's laggy, and incredibly buggy. Please fix that first before you buy other people apps, Mark Z.

6. blazee

Posts: 414; Member since: Jan 02, 2012

works incredibly fine for me

4. joens16

Posts: 9; Member since: May 07, 2013

A good way to monetize would be to make you watch a quick ad before you can watch a snap sent to you. I wouldn't want an ad on every snap but maybe every once in a while

9. JewBakaUCFG

Posts: 176; Member since: Sep 25, 2012

Stop giving them devious ideas!

5. jamesedward318 unregistered

All I am going to say is that SnapChat has provided me many of good images for a while now. That is all!

7. Daytonadave17

Posts: 54; Member since: Oct 26, 2013

Snapchat for windows phone please!! I mean dammit. What's the hold up!!???

8. InspectorGadget80 unregistered

I would never sell anything to mark.

10. downphoenix

Posts: 3165; Member since: Jun 19, 2010

I hope Zuckerberg keeps investing in these fads that are turning into toxic assets to at least offset what he gets off Facebook.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.