Samsung's Galaxy S6 Active may come with a microSD card slot, but at a high cost

Samsung's Galaxy S6 Active may come with a microSD card slot, but at a high cost
When Samsung finally unveiled the Galaxy S6 and Galaxy S6 edge at the start of this month, everybody gawked at the sleek looks of the new handsets – no denying there. However, many were irked by the omission of two features that have, more or less, become signature for Samsung through the years – a user replaceable battery and a microSD storage expansion slot.

Now, since Sammy has done so well in battery optimization with its previous flagships – the Note 4 and Galaxy S5 – and has added a couple of pretty effective power saving modes, we'd feel safe to assume that less and less users feel the urge to carry a spare battery on them at all times. So, the removable battery issue may not affect many, though, the amount of users that will be missing the microSD card slot is, indeed, much larger – there's just something about being hard-limited to the phone's internal SD that irks Samsung fans, as they've boasted about expandable storage for years.

Well, hardcore devotees of Sammy's older style may want to wait just a little longer, as the Galaxy S6 Active may meet their needs a bit better, according to the following report.

Reddit user “garshol” sat down with a Samsung rep a couple of days ago to discuss the new Galaxies, and the Active was among the topics at the table. The ruggedized version of Sammy's latest flagship will boast “similar” hardware under the hood, according to the report, and will come with an SD card slot. However, it will also come at a cost – according to garshol's posts, the Active's camera will be a lower class than the one on the flagship model, but at least it may still have OIS. Additionally, the endurance model will not have a fingerprint scanner, and will lack a heartbeat sensor.

As for other features, appearance, and ruggedness – garshol's report says that the Active's battery may be removable, and it will see a return of the physical navigation buttons on the front. Supposedly, the phone is in final stages of development and should be launched some time mid-Summer.

We have to say we are a bit perplexed at Sammy omitting the heart-rate sensor from the Active version of its flagship (key word: “active”), but that's assuming that the report is 100% accurate. So, if it turns out that the rugged version of the Galaxy S6 has water resistance, removable battery, and a microSD card slot, would you prefer it to its sexy siblings?

source: Reddit via Phandroid

Related phones

Galaxy S6 Active
  • Display 5.1" 1440 x 2560 pixels
  • Camera 16 MP / 5 MP front
  • Processor Samsung Exynos 7 Octa, Octa-core, 2100 MHz
  • Storage 32 GB
  • Battery 3500 mAh(24h talk time)



1. techperson211

Posts: 1280; Member since: Feb 27, 2014

This kind of marketing strategy will not work for samsung there's a lot of Android OEM who offer a decent price of smartphone. Apple on the other hand is just one OEM of ios.

2. ChunkDiesel072014

Posts: 39; Member since: Feb 26, 2015

There's always a catch... if it has 5mp/13mp 1080p 2800mah and it has the same colors and of course the sd card slot and removable back id get it unlocked for my wife no problem

3. phonehome

Posts: 812; Member since: Dec 19, 2014

First. (I don't really care either but still felt like writing it) If S6 sales flop (as I hope for to allow the following), hopefully Samsung will have learned a lesson and feature the 'Active' with a removable battery in addition to the SD card slot. If not, then release an S6 'Utility' (or whatever they want to call it) which has both features that were stolen from loyal users. Not to mention restoring them with the S7 and not stripping the Note 5 of such.

29. j2001m

Posts: 3061; Member since: Apr 28, 2014

See my above post then they will remove all the memory r and w speeds and the phone will lag again as before

4. Heisenberg

Posts: 373; Member since: Feb 11, 2015

Honestly, human needs are insatiable. S5 came with all these features but it failed S6 stripped those features and added other things yet you aren't stil satisfied. Sammy isn't a stingy company, these two features have ways u can handle them. No SD card: cloud storage, 32gb base model, more storage options Removeable battery: excellent battery life, quick charge, wireless charge Presence of sd card will make the device slower. It's this same set of people that would still complain of lag. If you are good with the phone buy, if you aren't buy another phone and quit discouraging interested and potential buyers

6. phonehome

Posts: 812; Member since: Dec 19, 2014

S5 feels flimsy without a case (stubborn morons), and many S4 users were not due for an upgrade. And for the record; as flimsy as it might feel, it can survive being run over by an SUV. Can be viewed on YouTube.

27. Doctorluv unregistered

Well said #Heisenbeg!! U couldn't have said it any better

34. geodude074

Posts: 99; Member since: Mar 05, 2013

S5 was also uglier than yo momma.

43. Krjal

Posts: 425; Member since: Dec 19, 2013

The presence of an sd card does not make a device a slower. If you put in a slow sd card then accessing data on it will be slower but there are cards almost as fast as Sammy's UFS chips. I agree that with larger internal storage as standard it's less vital but it's still a loss of utility especially for professionals who use fast sd cards to store and move data around. I'm a graphic designer and I use sd cards all the time. Admittedly they're the more expensive and reliable ones but that's what I need jumping between tablets, Note 4 and cameras.

46. kevin91202

Posts: 642; Member since: Jun 08, 2014

@Krjal "The presence of an sd card does not make a device a slower. If you put in a slow sd card then accessing data on it will be slower but there are cards almost as fast as Sammy's UFS chips." This statement is completely wrong on all counts. 1. SD cards are MUCH slower than internal memory. 2. SD cards cannot transfer data quicker than UFS 2.0. 3. UFS 2.0 have speeds of real-world seq read of 320MB/s and seq write of 140MB/s, according to PA. 3. The fastest SD cards can only top out close 300MB/s. That's for UHS-II. UHS-I tops out at 100 MB/s. 4. There are no microSD that are UHS-II. 5. No smartphone in the world has UHS-I or UHS-II capabilities. 6. So, if you were to stick a UHS-I or UHS-II microSD card in your smartphone, you will only top out at speeds limited to the speed of the phone's SD controller. That's currently at about 30MB/s seq read, 20MB/s seq write. In conclusion, SD cards, if utilized for storing apps and photos/videos, will defeat the purpose of having Samsung's new UFS 2.0 memory.

5. delta

Posts: 80; Member since: Jan 29, 2015

The replaceable battery it's not because i need to carry two of them, it's because the battery eventually will die out of guaranty, or become fatty in a metal and glass sealed body that's a terrible thing, and with a removable one you just has to buy a new one on amazon. ...

7. phonehome

Posts: 812; Member since: Dec 19, 2014

And can't just walk into any store on a whim for replacement battery, unlike with Apple.

8. G9-Kokos

Posts: 27; Member since: Jan 31, 2015

You cant? Hm.. Its easy to remove the battery on S6. Its back is screwed and not very complex. Certainly not glue together like apple's.

13. mixedfish

Posts: 1551; Member since: Nov 17, 2013

The battery might be screwed in, but the rear cover is glued in. That's the same thing.

15. medicci37

Posts: 1361; Member since: Nov 19, 2011

Yeah good luck replacing that battery yourself

40. G9-Kokos

Posts: 27; Member since: Jan 31, 2015

Here in PA there was an article detailing how to remove the battery of S6 and it was rated moderate difficulty to do it. So yea. ill probably have enough luck to change the battery by myself. Thanks alot

9. Sagitter1

Posts: 12; Member since: Oct 13, 2014

Nonsense strategy, I can undestand the omission of the heartbeat sensor and the fingerprint scanner, but a lower camera is a real shame. As fot the removable battery it's understandable and the micro sd is nonsense, just sell it with 64 gb, it's plenty enough.

16. WWThinker

Posts: 55; Member since: Feb 10, 2012

Please keep your nonsense mouth shut! MicroSD is useful because it provides a fool proof way to transfer media, to load up a lot of media, ... Cloud storage is not exactly free. 64GBytes of eMMC storage can be filled up very fast for those who carries a lot of audio and video files while enjoying high-resolution photo and video taking at the same time!

18. epic_ninja420

Posts: 131; Member since: Nov 18, 2014

Yea because micro sd cards are not known to fail and they arent fool proof by any means, don't forget to unmount it or you will fry it. Why rely on external cloud storage when you can set up your own personal cloud at home?

19. Heisenberg

Posts: 373; Member since: Feb 11, 2015

It will be pre loaded with one drive and it's gonna be free for two years which is already an updrage year.

31. j2001m

Posts: 3061; Member since: Apr 28, 2014

1st sd card reader damage the bandwidth of the memory contorler and the r and w speeds of the phone making even the 1+1 faster then the note 4 and that before you put the sd card in. 2nd samsung give you 100+gb Of cloud for free that works better as its included within windows in the file manger so both are linked at the same time on the s6 3rd up to now iphones have had the fastest r and w speeds even with crap memory being used due to no sd card reader, the samsung a6 does not use Emmc storage it uses ufs 2.0 it needs more bandwidth than emmc that mean there is no way of adding sd card readers and is way more then 2x the speed of iphones in r and w speeds and way more then the note 4 4th if the Galaxy S6 Active as an sd card reader it will have emmc 5.1 storage and not ufs 2.0 and will lag like the note 4

30. j2001m

Posts: 3061; Member since: Apr 28, 2014

they just on about the 1.9 lens

10. romeo1

Posts: 814; Member since: Jan 06, 2012

I would love prefer it. I don't use my phone camera allot but when i do i only need ok quality as i usually only sent true WhatsApp. And an heart rate sensor is nothing i would need. I'd rather have the sd slot removable battery isn't needed if it has a battery life comparable with a z3

11. kobainez

Posts: 454; Member since: Apr 13, 2012

Why can't Samsung make s6 a waterproof phone with a glass body and a micro sd slot? Sony managed to do it but most Samdung fanboys complained about its bezels. S6 is not waterproof but still have a large bezels haha

23. lpratas

Posts: 398; Member since: Nov 09, 2011

Where are the large bezels, stupid troll! Go buy a sony phone, idiot.

25. vipervoid123

Posts: 163; Member since: Aug 27, 2013

Wow ~ awesome samfanboys ~ But at least you should know that S6 have lower screen to body ratio compare Xperia Z3 ~

42. phichart

Posts: 335; Member since: May 03, 2014

Ohhh... that's why sony is on the top... Lol hahahahaha..... If Sony is better than Samsung than every body will buy... Yeap... we should buy a Sony phone for Iron the Clothes hahaha

12. kobainez

Posts: 454; Member since: Apr 13, 2012

And no stereo speakers and smaller camera sensors

20. Heisenberg

Posts: 373; Member since: Feb 11, 2015

Good for you. Then go and buy Sony that incorporates all those features and leave Sammy thread alone. Def, you wouldn't do that cos you are a troll

24. lpratas

Posts: 398; Member since: Nov 09, 2011

Makes you itchy a$$, the camera sensors? Bigger than in your Sony toy, idiot.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.