Rule change for FCC spectrum auction requested by Sprint, T-Mobile, Spire and Dish

Rule change for FCC spectrum auction requested by Sprint, T-Mobile, Spire and Dish
T-Mobile, Sprint, Dish Network, Spire Wireless and others are requesting changes to the way that the FCC will conduct its auction for the 600MHz broadcast television wireless spectrum. The group wants the federal agency to conduct the auction as planned, with one big change; it wants half of the spectrum being auctioned off, roughly 40MHz, to be reserved for smaller carriers.

Current FCC laws prevent the agency from holding more than 30MHz of spectrum aside for carriers who currently own less than 45MHz of spectrum under 1GHz in a given market. This would prevent industry leaders like Verizon and AT&T from bidding. Sprint and T-Mobile argue that if the reserve isn't increased to 40MHz, only one small carrier will be able to grab a 10MHz x 10MHz block which would allow AT&T and Verizon to grab 10MHz blocks or more. To prevent this, T-Mobile would like to see purchases made from a larger reserve limited to 20MHz. This would prevent one small carrier from buying up all of the allotted spectrum held aside for smaller players in the industry.

The larger carriers like AT&T and Verizon argue that by increasing the size of the reserve, it will limit their participation in the auction, which will lead to a lower amount of money raised. It will also limit the amount of spectrum put up by broadcasters to be auctioned off since the television station owners might feel that they won't receive an acceptable amount of money for their licenses.

FCC Commissioner Michael O'Rielly warned earlier this month that putting too much spectrum in reserve for low priced carriers could make the entire auction fail. As an example, he pointed out that at a recent Canadian auction of AWS-3 spectrum, reserved spectrum winners accounted for only 4.58% of the total amount of the receipts. That was 20 times lower than the receipts brought in by buyers of unreserved spectrum.

source: FierceWireless



1. waddup121 unregistered

nice nice

3. johnbftl

Posts: 283; Member since: Jun 09, 2012

"Oh boo hoo. I'm John Legere, I can tout how much greater my company is than everyone else, claim I have the best LTE network, but I'm going to cry about the real companies being able to afford to bid higher on the spectrum than I can afford." That's business buddy. Quit crying like a little girl and realize your company is garbage and only survives off of your parent company. Don't worry though, they'll soon sell you off and you'll be out a job.

5. Salazzi

Posts: 537; Member since: Feb 17, 2014

Sure. While we're at it, how about Verizon and AT&T charge more and more to provide you your service. Your cries for getting price gouged would fall on deaf ears.

4. Augustine

Posts: 1043; Member since: Sep 28, 2013

IOW, the FCC is just looking out for bucks to finance the rest of the hollow, corrupt and bankrupt federal government which it's part of. The little carriers, like the "little people", be damned!

6. painnpanic

Posts: 34; Member since: Dec 18, 2013

So most of you are against small companys having a chance to improve there network to meet peoples demands, and allow the big two to charge for more spectrum. Busness wise yes you can make more money selling to the bigger companys but the people who really hurt are these smaller companys, and its customer because they will have no choise but to goto to the bigger (higher price) companies for better service. So one aution in Canada failed. This is the U.S. not the same.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit for samples and additional information.