Motorola DROID Turbo vs Samsung Galaxy Note 4 vs LG G3: specs comparison

Motorola DROID Turbo vs Samsung Galaxy Note 4 vs LG G3: specs comparison
The super pixel-dense Quad HD displays are quickly becoming the go-to choice in the highest tier of Android devices. The first among the well-known smartphone manufacturers to employ this new top-of-the-line display technology was LG with its G3. The rest of the gang followed suit and we got treated to a whole bunch of Quad HD-toting handsets, like the S Pen-toting Samsung Galaxy Note 4 and the ginormous Google Nexus 6. Well, we have a new kid on the Quad HD block, as the just-unveiled Motorola DROID Turbo is the latest Android monster with an extremely pixel-dense display in store. 

Being one of the most compact devices to employ this display tech, the fresh DROID goodness has an extremely high pixel density, only rivaled by a not-so-popular version of the Samsung Galaxy S5, the Samsung Galaxy S5 LTE-A. Well, the latter is not widely-available, so we determined that we'll compare the new Motorola with the two most popular Quad HD phones available at the moment, the Galaxy Note 4 and the LG G3 that we spoke of earlier. Undoubtedly, the battle will be nothing short of fierce one, because all three contenders have pretty well-endowed specs sheets.

Check them out right below and you be the  judge on which one's got the winning hand!

Motorola DROID Turbo vs Samsung Galaxy Note 4 vs LG G3

Display

Display size

5.2 inches
5.7 inches
5.5 inches

Resolution

1440 x 2560 pixels
1440 x 2560 pixels
1440 x 2560 pixels

Pixel density

565 ppi
515 ppi
538 ppi

Technology

AMOLED
Super AMOLED
IPS LCD

Screen-to-body

70.76 %
74.39 %
75.22 %

Hardware & Performance

System chip

Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC

Processor

Quad-core, 2700 MHz, Krait 450
Octa-core, 1900 MHz, ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm
Quad-core, 2500 MHz, Krait 400

GPU

Adreno 420
Mali-T760 MP6
Adreno 330

RAM

3 GB LPDDR3
3 GB LPDDR3
3 GB LPDDR3

Internal storage

64 GB
32 GB
32 GB

OS

Android (6.0 Marshmallow, 5.1 Lollipop, 4.4.4)
Android (6.0 Marshmallow, 5.1 Lollipop, 5.0 Lollipop, 4.4), Samsung TouchWiz UI
Android (6.0 Marshmallow, 5.1 Lollipop, 5.0 Lollipop, 4.4.2)

Battery

Capacity

3900 mAh
3220 mAh
3000 mAh

Charging

Qualcomm Quick Charge 2.0
Qualcomm Quick Charge 2.0
 

Talk time

 
 
19.00 hours
the average is 19 h (1113 min)

Stand-by time

 
 
22.8 days (548 hours)
the average is 20 days (489 h)

Talk time (3G)

 
20.00 hours
the average is 24 h (1414 min)
21.00 hours
the average is 24 h (1414 min)

Stand-by time (3G)

 
 
23.0 days (553 hours)
the average is 27 days (645 h)

Stand-by time (4G)

 
 
25.0 days (600 hours)
the average is 25 days (590 h)

Music playback

 
82.00 hours
 

Video playback

 
14.00 hours
 

Camera

Rear

Single camera
Single camera
Single camera

Main camera

20.7 megapixels
16 megapixels
13 megapixels

Features

Autofocus
Optical image stabilization, Autofocus, Back-illuminated sensor (BSI)
Optical image stabilization, Laser autofocus, Back-illuminated sensor (BSI)

Specifications

Aperture size: F2.0
Aperture size: F2.2; Focal length: 31 mm; Sensor size: 1/2.6"; Pixel size: 1.12 μm
Aperture size: F2.4; Focal length: 29 mm; Sensor size: 1/3.06"; Pixel size: 1.12 μm

Video recording

3840x2160 (4K UHD) (24 fps), 1920x1080 (Full HD) (30 fps)
3840x2160 (4K UHD) (30 fps), 1920x1080 (Full HD) (60 fps)
3840x2160 (4K UHD) (30 fps), 1920x1080 (Full HD) (30 fps)

Recording format

 
 
MPEG4, H.263, H.264

Features

Video calling
Optical image stabilization, Continuous autofocus, Picture-taking during video recording, Video calling, Video sharing
Optical image stabilization

Front

2 megapixels
3.7 megapixels
2.1 megapixels

Video capture

1920x1080 (Full HD)
2560x1440 (QHD) (30 fps)
1920x1080 (Full HD)

Design

Dimensions

5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches (143.5 x 73.3 x 11.2 mm)
6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches (153.5 x 78.6 x 8.5 mm)
5.76 x 2.94 x 0.35 inches (146.3 x 74.6 x 8.9 mm)

Weight

6.21 oz (176 g)
the average is 6.1 oz (176 g)
6.21 oz (176 g)
the average is 6.1 oz (176 g)
5.26 oz (149 g)
the average is 6.1 oz (176 g)

Materials

 
Back: Plastic; Frame: Aluminum
Back: Plastic

Resistance

Splash
 
 

Biometrics

 
Fingerprint (swipe)
 

Features

Touch sensitive control keys
Notification light, Touch sensitive control keys
 


FEATURED VIDEO

13 Comments

1. Lememurilo

Posts: 50; Member since: Oct 13, 2014

No OIS or expendable memory?

3. blingblingthing

Posts: 982; Member since: Oct 23, 2012

Then get a Note 4 or LG G3

2. jcdz89

Posts: 78; Member since: Mar 01, 2013

DROID turbo > everything else..

4. torr310

Posts: 1708; Member since: Oct 27, 2011

The supported bands are not as many as other phones. Wish every phone will be a world phone. Apple did a good job on this.

5. rob5150

Posts: 183; Member since: Oct 31, 2011

Who makes up the spec chart above? In the first line both the g3 and note 4 are larger dimensions. But the icon for the dimensions show that the turbo is bigger?

6. ThirdEye

Posts: 33; Member since: Oct 31, 2012

LG G3 does have LTE Band 4(1700/2100) compatibility. LG G3 D851 is the model.

7. mawhob2222

Posts: 219; Member since: Mar 22, 2014

Droid Turbo > note4 + xperia z3 + iPhone6

8. darkkjedii

Posts: 31678; Member since: Feb 05, 2011

This is the new beast, spec wise, it's hands down the best. Real world usage is needed though. Nice phone Moto.

9. Rorschach

Posts: 83; Member since: Apr 26, 2013

Welcome back, moto

10. gigaraga

Posts: 1454; Member since: Mar 29, 2013

Droid Turbo looks good, but Note 4 seems to be better. Loving the QHD race nonetheless though.

11. supermario

Posts: 5; Member since: Sep 06, 2014

11.2mm thickness is a shame. And no OIS or storage expansion don't help either. Otherwise its a killer, especially with the battery. I think the Note 4 still seems like a better overall package.

12. Droid_X_Doug

Posts: 5993; Member since: Dec 22, 2010

"I think the Note 4 still seems like a better overall package." +1. Note 4 is not a carrier-exclusive item, either.

13. Fazz1977

Posts: 153; Member since: Oct 15, 2014

They can spec it up all they like, Moto have poor QC and don't honour their warranty.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.
FCC OKs Cingular's purchase of AT&T Wireless