x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Hidden picShow menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Google Glass isn't the privacy-killer the media wants it to be

Google Glass isn't the privacy-killer the media wants it to be

Posted: , by Michael H.

Tags :

Google Glass isn't the privacy-killer the media wants it to be

You’ve likely seen the article run a number of times already, and they will just become more and more frequent as Google Glass gets closer and closer to release. The title of the article is always something designed to scare you, because “Google Glass is going to destroy privacy!” Well look, we’re not as reactionary and easily scared as some others, and we think that the target of the trouble is not Google Glass at all. It’s just a simple fear of the unknown; a fear of the new.

Some people are complaining that Google Glass won’t be a useful product, but that’s also not an interesting argument to us, because if you haven’t used a product, you can’t judge it. There have been countless times when new products have come to market that were something different, so we didn’t know how to process it. And, with Glass as with social networks, location-aware devices, and other technologies, there can be uses that arise after release that we never expected (and likely Google never expected either). Aside from those who want to dislike the unknown, there are also those who would use it to scare people in the name of “protecting the public”.

Misinformation and fearmongering

The base of the entire problem seems to be that Google Glass amounts to having an “always on” camera on your face. Let’s just start by debunking this claim, because if Google has found a way to have a camera constantly on, and constantly streaming video either to your phone storage or to the Internet, then we should actually be celebrating the breakthrough that Google has made in designing batteries. If Google Glass really can do everything the fearmongers claim, the battery of that device (and the storage capacity of the connected phone) have to be technological marvels the likes of which we’ve never seen before.

So, then the issue becomes simply that you have a camera on your face, and you can record video or take a picture any time you want. Of course, this is exactly like every other camera that has been in society for years and years, just on your face. Every one of us risks having our picture taken any time we walk out the door. That’s why it’s called “going out in public”. There’s no expectation of privacy when anyone can see you on the street. 

Incompatible arguments

Okay, but people claim they get “creeped out” by having their picture taken. This is also not true. If you don’t want your picture taken, you either avoid the person with the camera, or you ask the photographer to not take your picture. This is when our absolute favorite inane argument comes out about Google Glass, because many people would say “but you can never know when someone is taking pictures with Glass!”

Really? What amazes us is that some people can actually make this argument while simultaneously saying that they would never wear Google Glass because it isn’t “fashionable”. Here’s the little secret: the style of Google Glass is the privacy control. Look at any picture of someone wearing Google Glass, you cannot think "oh, those are just normal glasses." It is completely incompatible to complain about the potential privacy issues around Google Glass, and in the next breath, complain about how you wouldn't wear them because they look so strange.

Google Glass isn't the privacy-killer the media wants it to be

It’s not like Google designed Glass to blend in with traditional eyewear. Glass looks strange, it makes you take a second look, and it gives you pause, because it is different. And, when you’re recording a video, there is a red light that comes on, just like many other cameras. On top of that, if you want to take a picture, you have to either tap the touchpad of Glass, meaning a pretty big and noticeable movement with your arm, or you have to give a voice command, meaning you have to say out loud that you are taking a picture. Can someone explain again how we are supposed to be having our picture taken all over the place without noticing?

If someone is far enough away to take the picture with Glass without you noticing, they would have been able to take that same picture with any traditional camera or smartphone and you wouldn’t have noticed that either. This leads to what gets us so annoyed about the Glass articles so far: the fearmongering has been focused on the technology, even though the behavior we’re worried about is nothing new.

Refocusing the argument

If you know Jeff Jarvis, journalism professor and tech blogger, you’ve heard this appeal to reason before: we need to condemn the behavior, not the technology. For example, there has always been identity theft, technology can make it easier, but it’s the behavior that’s should be the crime, not the technology. The same applies here. We’ve had cameras for generations. We’ve had cameraphones, capable of easily distributing those images quickly, or even sharing them publicly on the web for years now. Google Glass is doing nothing new in that respect.

The same goes for the personal privacy issue where Google Glass will be feeding more information to Google about where you are and what you’re doing. You’ve had a smartphone with a constant connection to GPS and Google for a while now, and it’s doing a great job of giving Google all that information. And, you know what you’ve gotten out of the deal? Google Now, possibly the single most useful piece of software to come out of the mobile revolution to date.

The only thing that Google Glass has done wrong is to be a lightning rod for the issue. Google is obviously hyper-aware of the criticism already surrounding the device, and has been working to not only raise awareness of the product. Google has designed the Glass to stand out, to be noticed, so that any privacy concerns will be lessened.

Perhaps the privacy concerns can’t be removed completely, but they couldn’t be eradicated for cameraphones or point-and-shoot cameras that came before. Google Glass is nothing to get so scared about. It’s simply a new device using old technology in a new way. There will be an adjustment period, as always, but Google Glass shouldn’t hold any special place in the privacy debate. The “creep factor” comes from what people do with the technology, not the technology itself.

  • Options

posted on 05 Mar 2013, 11:15 4

1. p5yb0rg (unregistered)

Google glass would be the end of privacy as we know it. This would make it way too easy to be tracked and monitored by Google and the US Government. I'll pass.

posted on 05 Mar 2013, 11:22 38

3. MichaelHeller (Posts: 2720; Member since: 26 May 2011)

Easier to be tracked than with the phone in your pocket?

posted on 05 Mar 2013, 12:23 12

10. PhoneArenaUser (Posts: 5498; Member since: 05 Aug 2011)

Thanks for article, Michael H.
I think that you write best articles in PhoneArena.com and my question is why you are more in articles than in smartphone reviews? I and I think that majority other PhoneArena.com visitors would like to see more smartphone reviews from you, because current trend says that majority PhoneArena.com visitors anymore don't trust and don't take seriously reviews written by Ray S.

posted on 05 Mar 2013, 12:34 5

11. PhoneArenaUser (Posts: 5498; Member since: 05 Aug 2011)

I don't say that I like everything what you wrote (because everyone can have own subjective opinion), but I respect one thing, when I read your articles I see that you put more effort in articles than some other PhoneArena.com writers. Anyway I don't want to offend other PhoneArena.com writers, I just say that I think that Michael H. puts more effort in articles. And that's why I ask about why you don't make smartphone reviews. :)

posted on 05 Mar 2013, 15:27

20. p5yb0rg (unregistered)

Cell phones are very easy to track due to their gps and location based features. Google Glass however, will open many avenues and provide additional ways of tracking peoples interests, patterns, likes/dislikes, etc. Now, having the ability to tap into what we're watching/looking at during any given time, gives them full access to our lives.
It's so unfortunate for those who aren't aware that Google does monitor our searches and uses our results to personalize ads and what we intake.
Kudos to the uneducated.

posted on 05 Mar 2013, 15:58 4

21. MichaelHeller (Posts: 2720; Member since: 26 May 2011)

Any Google service that monitors you can be opted out of. GPS can be turned off. Google Goggles (which would be the only way to track what's in your photos) is an opt-in service. If you don't want Google monitoring your searches, use DuckDuckGo.

Kudos to spreading fear rather than knowledge.

posted on 05 Mar 2013, 16:10

22. p5yb0rg (unregistered)

My motive isn't to spread fear, but to pull back the curtains of those who aren't seeing the light or truth. Google's success is primarily based on their ads, which are focused around our search history/patterns. Do you honestly think randomly placed ads equate to success?
Do your homework bro.

posted on 05 Mar 2013, 17:49 3

29. joey_sfb (Posts: 6600; Member since: 29 Mar 2012)

And you are the google glasses expert without using one.... Gee!!!

I would reserve my comment till i actually own one.

posted on 05 Mar 2013, 18:09 2

30. bayusuputra (Posts: 963; Member since: 12 Feb 2012)

Do YOUR homework, sis..

You CAN opt out!!!

wtf is wrong with people, they don't effing now something and then just effing spread some effing bull..

Yes, Google tracks you, but that's when you don't want to opt out.. I don't see any ads in my inbox because I opt out.. As simple as that.. smh..

posted on 05 Mar 2013, 18:13 2

31. PhoneArenaUser (Posts: 5498; Member since: 05 Aug 2011)

Internet provider also can track you, maybe you should disconnect?

posted on 05 Mar 2013, 18:52 2

33. MichaelHeller (Posts: 2720; Member since: 26 May 2011)

Pulling back the curtain means telling both sides of the story. Everyone knows that Google's revenue is almost all based on ads, and those ads get more valuable with more info on us.

But, we get benefit from Google having more info on us too. We get better search results, we get better services, and we get better products.

And, as I said, you can opt out of all of this if you want to. But, your ISP tracks every website you visit without your consent, and there's no opt out there.

posted on 05 Mar 2013, 19:20

38. jroc74 (Posts: 6019; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)

Thank you.

How in the world does he think the MPAA and RIAA get info about ppl that download possible illegal material?

And if he is so paranoid...he must want Siri and Google Now to be half baked shells of what they are now. GPS apps are alot better when more of your info is known.

posted on 05 Mar 2013, 18:58

35. jroc74 (Posts: 6019; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)

Hotmail and outlook.com has search history/pattern ads.

Hotmail and outlook.com can be accessed on phones.

I await for your opinion about MS.

posted on 05 Mar 2013, 11:37 1

4. dr_fajardo12 (Posts: 118; Member since: 26 Aug 2012)

conspiracy theory?

posted on 05 Mar 2013, 11:43 3

6. Reluctant_Human (Posts: 904; Member since: 28 Jun 2012)

Yes Google was founded by the government after they were commanded by Illuminati to find out everything you do because you won't add them on facebook where you publicly and willingly post everything about your daily life..

OR bear with me on this one.. it could be because Google likes pushing the limits of technology because its PROFITABLE.. (cue ominous music)

posted on 05 Mar 2013, 12:10 4

8. technut (Posts: 74; Member since: 03 Aug 2012)

You do realize your being tracked right now right???

posted on 05 Mar 2013, 16:31

26. p5yb0rg (unregistered)

Do you realize you're not using correct grammar?

posted on 05 Mar 2013, 18:46

32. roscuthiii (Posts: 2241; Member since: 18 Jul 2010)

Do you realize your user name is comprised of leet? I mean really, leet?! So 1980's.

Oh, now I get your Google paranoia. You think it's 1984.

posted on 05 Mar 2013, 13:43 2

16. Aeires (unregistered)

There's a deep, dark cave waiting for you and your paranoia.

posted on 05 Mar 2013, 23:50 1

39. Jonathan41 (Posts: 532; Member since: 22 Mar 2012)

Right "p5yb0rp". I'm sure Google out to get us all. Just like Skynet, I'm going to watch The Terminator right now to prepare. I'll be sure to not use the Play store though...wouldn't want them getting suspicious, ey.

posted on 05 Mar 2013, 11:16

2. VJo003 (Posts: 360; Member since: 11 Mar 2012)

Who's she???

posted on 05 Mar 2013, 11:40 3

5. Smart (Posts: 76; Member since: 20 Aug 2011)

There are two "she"..........Who you talking about?

Both are gorgeous though....

And about google glass...I am excited as hell.....

Just waiting to get my hand on one....

posted on 05 Mar 2013, 11:46 4

7. _Bone_ (Posts: 2155; Member since: 29 Oct 2012)

Her identity is kept private.

posted on 05 Mar 2013, 13:01 1

14. disneydad (Posts: 114; Member since: 26 Mar 2012)

Perfect avatar for this article VJ. LOL

posted on 05 Mar 2013, 14:11

17. Peter27 (Posts: 233; Member since: 13 Jul 2012)

vjo003. she looks good only because of google glass. once she takes it off...

posted on 05 Mar 2013, 12:13

9. ddmcd (Posts: 1; Member since: 05 Mar 2013)

"Some people are complaining that Google Glass won’t be a useful product, but that’s also not an interesting argument to us, because if you haven’t used a product, you can’t judge it."

I laughed out loud at the above comment given that Google's dribbling out of info about Glass is intended to get people talking about it.

posted on 05 Mar 2013, 13:00 3

12. htc_prep (Posts: 303; Member since: 09 Oct 2009)

here here Michael H. all very valid points of conversations from the overly paranoid, uneducated, ignorant backwoods individuals!!!

on a side note... no one will raise these issues or concerns once or if the "iWatch" ever comes to fruition. although more then likely they will share a few commonalities.

posted on 05 Mar 2013, 13:00 1

13. disneydad (Posts: 114; Member since: 26 Mar 2012)

Google Glass conjures up the comedic fears from the Futurama episode about the 'EyePhone'. Hopefully we won't all become an army of zombies under the direction of Mom. lol

posted on 05 Mar 2013, 13:11

15. N-fanboy (Posts: 543; Member since: 12 Jan 2013)

Drop this $hit and you drop your 2k$ :-D

posted on 05 Mar 2013, 15:11 5

18. ultimatebatman (Posts: 52; Member since: 04 Dec 2012)

No one would argue against Glass if it was an Apple product. It would be considered the ultimate gift from Steve Job's undying spirit, or whatever cult-like praise Apple fans can conjure

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories