What's dual-frequency GPS and does my phone have it? Accuracy test on OnePlus 7 Pro vs S10+

A new term started creeping up in manufacturers' phone specs listing, making a cameo way back with the Xiaomi Mi 8 but still not as widespread as we'd like. Xiaomi even came out with the video you see above to brag about its virtues. 

The feature is marked in a specs sheet as dual-frequency GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite Systems), often with "L1+L5" posted after it, as these are the two bands of the US Global Positioning System (GPS) that it works on. 

It simply means that instead of receiving signal from a particular satellite on one frequency, the chip inside the phone in question is capable of doing it on two. Here are the purported benefits:

  • Faster satellite locks
One frequency is used for locking the satellite, the other for positioning

  • More accurate, lane-level positioning
The difference between knowing on which road are you driving, and in which lane on that road, or 1ft (30cm) vs 16ft (5m) accuracy

  • Better city landscape and indoor positioning 
New York skyscrapers are notorious for causing signal reflection and multipath errors that can be mitigated with dual-frequency GPS positioning

Does my Android phone have dual-frequency GPS?

While many phone makers started putting the Broadcom BCM47755 chip that supports this feature, and Qualcomm lists it in Snapdragon 855's chipset virtues, it is not an option that is unlocked even on phones with the necessary hardware. How can you check? Easy, just download GPSTest from the Play Store and if you see L5 or E5a in the CF column (carrier frequency), you are golden.

The app can track the main GNSS constellations: GPS (denoted by an American flag), Galileo (EU flag), GLONASS (Russian flag) and Beidou (Chinese flag). It also shows regional satellite-based augmentation systems (SBAS), including QZSS (Japanese flag), GAGAN (Indian flag), ANIK F1 flag (Canadian flag), Galaxy 15 (American flag), Inmarsat 3-F2 and 4-F3 (UK flag), SES-5 (Luxembourg flag), and Astra 5B (Luxembourg flag).

As you can see above, the phones on top - OnePlus 7 ProP30 ProOppo Reno 10x Zoom, and Honor 20 Pro, have dual-frequency enabled, while the ones below - Galaxy S10+, LG G8, and the Pixel 3, do not. Mum's the word on the iPhone's situation, though, as there is no corresponding app for iOS. 

The European Union can't shut up about its own Galileo system, going to great lengths to extol its virtues with fun little promos like the video below. According to the creator of the GPSTest app Dr. Barbeau, however, in the US there will be no European satellites listed, even if the chipset supports multi-GNSS constellations and can take in Galileo signals, like the 855.

"This is because the US Federal Communication Commission (FCC) must first approve Galileo before any devices can use its signals on US soil," says the European Global Navigation Satellite Systems Agency

Does it work better? S10+ vs 7 Pro vs iPhone XR GPS accuracy test

The answer is, it depends on the chipset. While some of the phones with Snapdragon 855 here have their dual-frequency GNSS abilities enabled - the OnePlus 7 Pro and Oppo Reno 10x - they don't necessarily show better accuracy than, say, the Pixel 3 with Snapdragon 845, or the LG G8 with Snapdragon 855 itself.

Interestingly enough, all the phones we have in the office that showed dual-frequency as enabled, are Chinese brands, including the OnePlus 7 Pro, even though it carries a Snapdragon 855 chipset. Our 7 Pro is the model approved for sales in Europe, though, so the FCC review process could be in play here as well. 

The GPS Test app that we used is most likely not really optimized to utilize these capabilities and yet it managed to show that some dual-frequency devices, like the ones with Huawei's Kirin 980 chipset, are capable of following almost all satellites they saw in the more challenging indoor scenario. They also show the highest location accuracy of 13 feet - the second at the top P30 Pro, and the fourth Honor 20 Pro. 

Next is the third one at the top - the Oppo Reno with Snapdragon 855, while the other dual-frequency champ with the same chipset - OnePlus 7 Pro - didn't show better results than, say, the LG G8 which is second in the bottom row. The Exynos chipset on the S10+ showed markedly worse accuracy indoors, while the iPhone XR's vertical accuracy was on par with the Reno.

We are only showing the indoor test, as outside all phones performed great with a very similar location accuracy under the clear sky. What the indoor positioning probe demonstrates, however imprecise, is that some dual-frequency location hardware can indeed perform better with weaker signal and more interference from buildings.

That is to say in an urban environment, such as among Manhattan's skyscrapers, and that's all we could ask for. Now hurry up and unleash the dual-headed dragon on all phones already!

Related phones

Galaxy S10+
  • Display 6.4" 1440 x 3040 pixels
  • Camera 12 MP / 10 MP front
  • Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Octa-core, 2800 MHz
  • Storage 128 GB + microSDXC
  • Battery 4100 mAh
7 Pro
  • Display 6.7" 1440 x 3120 pixels
  • Camera 48 MP / 16 MP front
  • Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, Octa-core, 2840 MHz
  • Storage 128 GB
  • Battery 4000 mAh(34h talk time)



1. Chris_ABN

Posts: 194; Member since: May 16, 2018

*coughs* Bulls**t!

2. Kohai

Posts: 50; Member since: Jun 04, 2010

Huawei phones are the most accurate by far! Do they use a propietary GPS chip?

11. cheetah2k

Posts: 2265; Member since: Jan 16, 2011

They use Chinese GPS sats.... So they can track your position accurately HAHAHA

3. perry1234

Posts: 647; Member since: Aug 14, 2012

Exynos lags in battery consumption, standby battery drain, supported frequency bands, poorer isp and now poorer GPS chip. People don't say a word on how Samsung is ripping off the world (except US and Canada, they only lag in GPS since they have SD 855), but sure, harp on irrelevant debates like whether OP7Pro 3X "lossless" zoom is "optical or not" .

4. splus

Posts: 160; Member since: Nov 26, 2011

True, this is such an important aspect of every phone, yet both Samsung and all the reviewers just ignore it. Exynos is a terrible chipset!

8. oldskool50 unregistered

All chipsets suck at something. But who cares about fual GPS to begin with? If this feature is that important, the person who needs it will buy the best supporting option

13. Kohai

Posts: 50; Member since: Jun 04, 2010

Well, when you travel a lot and visit big cities GPS accuracy is very important to move around, at least for me. I don't care if it's because a dual GPS or not but I do care for this and it's usually something that is not reviewed anywhere.

9. oldskool50 unregistered

The Exynos per clock speed actually gets better battery-life vs the Snapdragon. Gets better life than the IPhone too. The Exynos only needs to support GSM. And fact is, Samsung always makes a specific band supporting model for phones outside South Korea, so actually you're wrong their too. Poor ISP? Be specific. Because Samsing phones work on any ISP. Sounds like you don't even know what it even means. You just sound like the typical Samsung haters club members.

10. Tech-shake

Posts: 213; Member since: Nov 14, 2016

He means Image signal processor not internet service provider. Anandtech reviewed both models of the s10 and their tests show that the exynos isp version has a significantly inferior performance to that of the snapdragon 855 especially in hdr scenarios. Just go look at the anandtech review for yourself.

12. perry1234

Posts: 647; Member since: Aug 14, 2012

Finally a sane voice! Thank you! @oldskool50 : Look, buy whatever phone you want, I couldn't care less. But the fact remains that overall Exynos chipsets are rushed and don't undergo proper QC. I can even add that I have kind of an inside source-a friend working at Samsung R&D. He tells me that since SD810 debacle, Qualcomm has stepped up its quality control(QC) game up by a lot. On the other hand, Samsung couldn't be bothered less.

14. SaRPeR

Posts: 147; Member since: Mar 02, 2017

Galaxy S7 series, S8 series, S9 series and S10 series Exynos version is better both in performance and battery life.

5. tedkord

Posts: 17387; Member since: Jun 17, 2009

You can be pretty sure the iPhone doesn't have it. If they did, they'd slap a new name in it (Double Hertz Retina GPS?) and pretend they'd invented it.

6. Quantify

Posts: 9; Member since: Apr 12, 2015

Galileo working just fine on my Pixel 3a. My understanding is that the legal issues were resolved. currently getting GPS, GLONASS, and Galileo, along with SBAS from GPS. Sadly, L1/E1 in Carrier Frequency.

7. jacky899

Posts: 431; Member since: May 16, 2017

Wow that 13 ft. on the Huawei and Honor is pretty amazing. I know Samsung GPS is one of its weak points, especially the older Galaxies frequently have problems connecting to the GPS and drops connection randomly. Never had that problem with the Iphones I used.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.