x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA
  • Hidden picShow menu
  • Home
  • News
  • Apple iPad 2 is to have a 1.2GHz dual-core chipset, claims Concord Securities analyst

Apple iPad 2 is to have a 1.2GHz dual-core chipset, claims Concord Securities analyst

Posted: , by Daniel P.

Tags :

Apple iPad 2 is to have a 1.2GHz dual-core chipset, claims Concord Securities analyst
Citing unnamed sources is a favorite pastime for analysts young and old, but this here iPad 2 update by Ming-Chi Kuo from Concord Securities actually sounds plausible, so we thought we'd share.

The analyst suggests an ARM Cortex-A9 based chipset, with two cores clocked at 1.2GHz, instead of the usual 1GHz. Numerous 1GHz dual-core chipsets are coming to market in the next months, so no surprise that Apple is keeping up with the Joneses, and even clocking it slightly higher to futureproof the tablet until next year, when quad-core might be all the rage.

More interesting is the PowerVR SGX543MP2 graphics subsystem he claims the iPad 2 will have, which coincides with previous rumors about the chipset. We won't speculate how many triangles per second will this dual-core graphics arrangement pump out, since we don't know if it will be produced by the 45nm process, like the current A4 chipset, or by the 40nm, or even 32nm, if Samsung is doing it, and it is ready with its 32nm fabrication lines.

Suffice it to say that Sony is using the quad-core PowerVR SGX543 variant in its upcoming PSP2 at the end of the year, and said it is as powerful as PS3. In any case this could very well be the new graphics king, we will see what Samsung has in store for us next month with its Orion chipset, which is using a different mobile graphics chip, though. Another performance boost the iPad 2 will receive from the increased clock frequency of the 512MB RAM, up to 1066 MHz.

The analyst expects an upgrade in the screen visual quality, but shoots down the rumors about a Retina Display ppi again. Apple already warmed up the developers that they might be looking into a more peculiar scaling for their apps on the iPad 2, not simply doubling up to 1536x2048, so something in the realms of 1200x1600 is more like it.

It is much more important that the new display is supposed to be a third thinner than the original, allowing for a svelter device, and a new anti-glare coating will be applied, improving the outdoor visibility. Apple has gotten a lot of flak over the iPad visibility outdoors, comparing it with transflective LCDs like those on the Notion Ink Adam tablet, so it is obviously wishing to improve on that front as well.

Here comes the not-so-cool part. Ming-Chi Kuo all but confirms in its note what we wrote last week - that the rear camera might indeed be 1MP, with a 0.3MP front-facing one, a page taken from the iPod touch. Not that you will be shooting around with a 10" tablet, but this will give an endless supply of fun for the blogosphere, considering most other high-end tablets are coming with 5MP shooters.

As we already reported, three versions are in the works - Wi-Fi only, one for the GSM, and one for the CDMA standards. Apple is not taking any chances with supply shortages this time. It plans to produce 4.5-5 million iPad 2s in the first quarter, so probably a simultaneous worldwide roll-out is in store.

If the Concord Securities note is correct, we already have a notion what might go in the next generation of the Apple iPhone - the dual-core chipset should be slightly underclocked than what we have in the iPad 2 to save battery, and we will have a raging graphics chipset, one which is sure to hold the fort until next year.

source: Electronista, B3D & MacRumors

  • Options

posted on 31 Jan 2011, 06:42 1

1. protozeloz (Posts: 5396; Member since: 16 Sep 2010)

that sounds great (except for the 1mp part :( ) 2011 its sure gonna be a great year for mobile phones

posted on 31 Jan 2011, 07:11 1

3. PhoneLuver (Posts: 481; Member since: 05 Jul 2010)

Totally agree with you! 1MP camera is a BIG disappointment!

posted on 31 Jan 2011, 13:18

7. LionStone (Posts: 844; Member since: 10 Dec 2010)

Yes, but isn't a camera period a BIG improvement over the first version? I guess adding even this weak camera was just beyond Apple to put it on the first version?

posted on 31 Jan 2011, 07:00 1

2. achilles (Posts: 54; Member since: 27 May 2010)

Fact: It took Apple until the Iphone 4 to put a camera flash on the device. Opinion: Given the history of incremental steps, there is no way this information could be true. It would be nice, but it's to big of a leap given Apple's history.

posted on 31 Jan 2011, 09:27

4. Droid (unregistered)

I agree with Achilles: apple takes its time and you sheep flock to the stores and buy these things. LMAO - hey next year the ipad 3 will have, wait, .......wait......... a 6MP camera instead of 5! OOOOOOooooOOO!!! You apple people are funny too. I know this dope who has the iphone 4 with a flash on it - yeah a flash for the camera! He goes around showing off saying opnly apple could manage a flash on a phone. *silence*.............Dude, my sony erricson back in 1995 had a flash on the camera. Basically, if apple built an airplane today in the news tomorrow it would state that apple invented flight. They use old technology and are now catching up becasue they are falling behind. The only thing they do well is make a simple device so everyone can use it - it's like taking my commador 64 and making it user friendly so everyone loves it. Now, the boast dual-core ----come on we have that already out there - Christ the Atrix has frigg'n dual core! Go away apple and DIE JOBS!

posted on 01 Feb 2011, 21:13

8. earle.evans (Posts: 27; Member since: 07 Mar 2010)

Jealous much are we? Droid has a small penga...

posted on 31 Jan 2011, 11:31

5. joe567 (unregistered)

if you watch the thunderbolt's video..its claimed to be faster than any dual core phone..im sure tablets r the same idea.

posted on 02 Feb 2011, 03:08

9. jroc74 (Posts: 6019; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)

Not exactly. It was said to have been pitted up against the Bionic and a Samsung phone and was said to be faster than both, but no one has seen the actual benchmark tests the person in the video speaks of.
And seeing as there have been benchmarks of the Thunderbolt and Bionic that we have actually seen and the Bionic always came out on top...I doubt what the person claims.
And I seriously doubt it is outperforming the dual core LG phone and the Atrix.

posted on 02 Feb 2011, 03:10

10. jroc74 (Posts: 6019; Member since: 30 Dec 2010)

Although the Thunderbolt does have a lil extra Ram, so it might be possible, but all benchmarks we have actually seen says otherwise.

posted on 31 Jan 2011, 11:43

6. skymitch89 (Posts: 1363; Member since: 05 Nov 2010)

Possibly the Orion chip from Samsung as well.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories