Apple claims Samsung GALAXY Nexus infringes on "slide-to-unlock" feature
posted by Alan F. / Jan 20, 2012, 4:20 PM
Neonode used the same sliding motion when that company took a look at producing phones some years ago. The Korean based manufacturer successfully used the exact same defense against Apple's patent infringement claims against it in the Netherlands last year. That case dealt with "methods of scrolling". March 15th will be the date of a hearing to determine if the utility model status is still valid or whether or not the court needs to reexamine the ruling. The case against Samsung should be interesting since Google had apparently gone out of its way to make sure that Android 4.0 would be "Apple proof". Google changed features like navigation on the touchscreen, the new unlock method, and other applications.
Apple's case against Samsung has some very interesting sidebars to it. While other claims against Android models were for features and functions that were clearly borrowed from Apple, the Samsung GALAXY Nexus does not have a particular path that a finger has to travel along to unlock the phone. Furthermore, since the GALAXY Nexus is a stock Android model, by specifically mentioning it in the complaint, it reveals that Apple's true beef is with Google, not Samsung.
Samsung GALAXY Nexus OS: Android 4.3, 4.2.2, 4.2.1, 4.2, 4.1.2, 4.1, 4.0.4, 4.0.1, 4.0 View Full specs
- Display 4.7" 720 x 1280 pixels
- Camera 5 MP / 1.3 MP front
- Processor TI OMAP4460, Dual-core, 1200 MHz
- Storage 32 GB
- Battery 1750 mAh(8.33h 3G talk time)
I love apple , but this time apple has gone overboard . Every company is using slide to unlock , is apple gonna sue them all ? Love the product , not the company that made it
posted on Jan 20, 2012, 4:23 PM 29
As annoying as this is, I'm more annoyed by the folks who issued that patent than Apple itself. Apple has to defend it's patents and copywrites by law, but the question is should it have been issued to begin with. I'm a huge Apple guy and I don't even think they should have been awarded a "Slide to Unlock" patent. But since they were, this is what comes from it.
posted on Jan 20, 2012, 5:18 PM 15
Posts: 1994; Member since: Jun 15, 2011
Yea I enjoy apple products as well but I have to disagree on this patent as well. Unless it is a carbon copy ripoff of the slide to unlock on the iPhone they don't have much of a case. The act of sliding to unlock a phone is pretty basic and not even something they invented. I trust the courts will see this as well.
posted on Jan 20, 2012, 5:27 PM 14
Posts: 14605; Member since: Dec 19, 2008
its not even close to the one apple uses. Its the ICS slide to unlock which u can slide in pretty much any direction, not just the set tracks like the iphone has. apple is just up to their old tricks of trying to sue anyone that is successful. If they win against the G-Nexus, it sets up a win for EVERY ICS phone automatically unless they change the lock screen.. again. But yea, I do agree jeff, the patent system is as much to blame for giving apple ammo as apple is for firing it.
posted on Jan 21, 2012, 4:09 AM 7
actually in ICS you can only swipe right to unlock the phone but it slides from the center to right not from left to right . And the design is way diffrent . All platforms have diffrent design i respect them all but i am still an iOS kind of guy
posted on Jan 24, 2012, 8:48 PM 0
Posts: 2000; Member since: Apr 16, 2011
> Every company is using slide to unlock , is apple gonna sue them all ? The fact is that Apple has the patent on slide to unlock.
posted on Jan 20, 2012, 7:58 PM 1
Posts: 336; Member since: Sep 04, 2011
Is apple really this desperate for costumers? They`ve stooped so low that they have to sue for every little thing? What about that little on off switch used in settings? They`re probably gonna sue over that too. Wouldn't `t be very surprised.
posted on Jan 20, 2012, 8:41 PM 8
Posts: 97; Member since: Nov 01, 2009
They have all the customers they want. Their is another issue here and if they want to waste a little of their money so be it. No different than us buying a beer. Can't save it all. With that being said the I phone forced all companies to get off their duffs and try to give better phones. They spanked windows and for that I'm thankful. How many companies would build the IPhone and sell it if they could?
posted on Jan 21, 2012, 4:18 AM 1
Posts: 2137; Member since: Jan 06, 2011
apple attacks in court samsung attacks through commercials... but honestly i think it is more the govs fault for issuing patents on simple stuff like this... ipad was alright but this is overboard.. but what do they expect apple to do by giving them a patent like this? tell everyone else they are free to use it dont worry?
posted on Jan 20, 2012, 4:28 PM 16
Just like M$ except their taking money from every Android device from every manufacturer when M$ already have billion ofdollars and when their mobile dept not making money they sieze the opportunity too take cash from other companies.
posted on Jan 21, 2012, 12:39 PM 0
Posts: 3621; Member since: Jan 19, 2011
Yep, Gadget, same thing. Except Microsoft worked with these other companies and came to licensing agreements to allow the companies to use their patents legally and without dragging them to court while trying to ban their products all over the world. Oh, wait, it really isn't like this at all. Huh.
posted on Jan 21, 2012, 4:28 PM 1
Posts: 101; Member since: Dec 20, 2011
Apple isn't required to 'work with' a company and come to a licensing agreement if they don't want to.. Every company is just trying to make money and keep their competitors from making money. I don't know why anyone is even moderately surprised. That being said, it's a lock screen. Whoooo cares. (Besides the Apple legal team..)
posted on Jan 22, 2012, 2:47 PM 0
APPLE STFU!! Getting sick and tired of your petty patent dispute
posted on Jan 20, 2012, 4:39 PM 17
Posts: 1459; Member since: Mar 09, 2010
How petty can you get.....touch screens have been used in banks since for ever. HTC used touchscreens in the pocket pc phones. Compaq used touch screens in the original pocket pc. Aplle just repackaged the way thingsthat were already developed, and some how got a patent on things by doing just a lil some thing different. GTFO!
posted on Jan 21, 2012, 11:24 AM 0
Posts: 2146; Member since: Oct 18, 2011
Apple gonna lose it...coz GNex doesn't exactly infringe on their crappy patent...here is little snippet - "The device is unlocked if contact with the display corresponds to a predefined gesture for unlocking the device"...I think there is no predefined gesture to unlock GNex...or there is?
posted on Jan 20, 2012, 4:43 PM 13
Posts: 58; Member since: Jan 27, 2010
c'mon Apple, really. I'll defend you to the end.......when you're right. You're taking it too far. This is coming from one of the biggest apple fanboys out there. Apple should stop wasting all this money and time in court and focus more and some new features for iOS.
posted on Jan 20, 2012, 4:47 PM 12
Posts: 1; Member since: Jan 20, 2012
OMFG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I will never buy another apple product !! I have an ipad, and was thinking of getting a macbook. but I can't support a company that sews everyone over stupid "patents" like this !!!! keep the market open for competition ! fight with innovation , people buy apple because of its capability to innovate . I'm not going to buy a galaxy nexus for the "slide to unlock" feature (I'm not even sure that its a "feature") I slide to unlock my window, I slide to unlock my laptop, I slide to unlock my freaking zipper!!! Apple, I was waiting for the iphone 5 to upgrade my old dumb phone, but now... yep... I'm going for the galaxy nexus ! as much as I love apple, I can't support a company who sews its way out of competition !!
posted on Jan 20, 2012, 4:55 PM 11
Send a warning to post author
Send a warning to Selected user.
The user has 0 warnings currently.
Next warning will result in ban!
Ban user and delete all posts
Message to PhoneArena moderator (optional):