AnTuTu posts the specs of Galaxy S7 with Exynos 8890, promises benchmark scores later

AnTuTu posts the specs of Galaxy S7 with Exynos 8890, promises benchmark scores later
The Snapdragon 820 version of the Galaxy S7 edge (SM-G935A for AT&T) already popped up in the AnTuTu benchmark database, complete with specs and the whole nine yards. From there we learned that the upcoming Samsung flagship will sport a new 12 MP camera indeed, as well as 4 GB of RAM, alongside the predictable 5.1" Quad HD Super AMOLED display.

Today, however, AnTuTu's own account on Weibo spilled the beans on none other than the Exynos 8890 version of the Galaxy S7, codenamed SM-G930F. Under the phones denoted with "F," Samsung usually hides the international unlocked versions of its handsets, so that one will probably arrive with the newest Exynos on board indeed, just as it was tipped in a leaked model number list back in November.

For the G930F newcomer in their database, the folks from AnTuTu actually disclosed the same string of specs as was previously revealed for the G935A. We will apparently be getting a 5.1" 1440 x 2560 pixels screen, 12 MP rear camera, 5 MP selfie shooter, 4 GB of RAM, and 64 GB of internal storage on that particular model. Since this is reportedly the Exynos 8890 version, it would be great to know the final benchmark tally, but AnTuTu is warning that the phone is currently still in the testing phase, so they might report the specific test run scores later on. Patience we must have, young Padawans.


source: AnTuTu via G4Games

Related phones

Galaxy S7
  • Display 5.1" 1440 x 2560 pixels
  • Camera 12 MP / 5 MP front
  • Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 820, Quad-core, 2200 MHz
  • Storage 32 GB + microSDXC
  • Battery 3000 mAh(28h 3G talk time)

FEATURED VIDEO

67 Comments

1. Shocky unregistered

They could have increased the screen size a little.

2. WPX00

Posts: 511; Member since: Aug 15, 2015

Well, they probably wanted to keep the phone the same size as the S6, perhaps so that old accessories will fit?

5. Shocky unregistered

That's never bothered them in the past.

62. cheetah2k

Posts: 2256; Member since: Jan 16, 2011

12MP camera?????? huh? I thought Samsung were chasing sony for their 23MP shooter?

39. TyrionLannister unregistered

Old accessories won't fit as the back will be curved. Besides, S7 is for S5 users as like every other 1 year upgrade, it won't offer much over its predecessor.

3. supersume

Posts: 10; Member since: Oct 04, 2013

No thank you. 5.1 inches is perfect for some of us

6. Shocky unregistered

Good for you, quite a large gap between 5.1" and 5.7" though, would be nice to have something in-between.

7. keithtae

Posts: 564; Member since: Mar 25, 2015

5.1 is the perfect size for me. I don't mine .1 or .2 inches bigger but not 5.5.

10. Shocky unregistered

Never said it had to be 5.5".

34. AndroidBoy21

Posts: 72; Member since: Dec 29, 2015

Its one of my favourite sizes

56. killer7D

Posts: 551; Member since: Sep 18, 2014

I totally agree .. 5.1 inch is perfect !

25. TyrionLannister unregistered

It's 5.17 inches. Benchmarks round it off to 5.1 inches.

38. joeytaylor

Posts: 957; Member since: Feb 28, 2015

Hey Tyrion...i have a curious question about apples a10.....with it probably bein built in the same die size...1. Will the preformace gains be drastic or just modestly. ..how much more do they have before the havento go to more cores...just wondering

40. TyrionLannister unregistered

I honestly have no idea. But Apple doesn't do anything drastic for regular iPhone chips(no S versions). iPhone4 had mediocre chip, iPhone 5 had mediocre chip, iPhone 6 had mediocre chip too and I expect the same from iPhone 7. PS. By mediocre I mean on par with competition. In comparison to the Ax chips of the S series models who slaughter the competition. So I expect a modest perf. increase 20-30% with the regular GPU boost 70-80%. Obviously this is just a speculation. But Apple likes to stick to their trends: upgrade the design in regular iPhone versions and the internals in 'S' models.

42. marorun

Posts: 5029; Member since: Mar 30, 2015

Apple A chip running android would get much lower benchmark and performance. Its thanks to iOS thats its slaughter competition as you say. But competition still open apps faster and better at multitasking. but the numbers you give will probably fit with what Apple release as marketing numbers yeah.

43. TyrionLannister unregistered

"Apple A chip running android would get much lower benchmark and performance." No, this suggests you know almost nothing about a system on a chip

58. keekai05

Posts: 116; Member since: Mar 31, 2015

ROFL! I couldn't have said it any better. +1 sir

51. alex3run

Posts: 715; Member since: May 18, 2014

"Apple A chip running android will get lower scores" - false, that's the statement of hardcore android fanboy with zero knowledge about hardware.

57. BLUEBLASTER

Posts: 930; Member since: Feb 23, 2014

So tell me Tyrion. What phone should I get this year with my upgrade?

65. TyrionLannister unregistered

With no phone released, i can't say anything.

32. may_czos

Posts: 955; Member since: Nov 22, 2014

No! There are enough of bloody phablets on the market.

4. sphonel

Posts: 16; Member since: Sep 24, 2014

What's the bet the Exynos won't match the A9 and will get absolutely destroyed by the A10. The 6S will also have a better AnTuTu score, then the iP7 will blow the S7 out of the water.

8. Shocky unregistered

Antutu favours single core performance now so it's irrelevant for Android devices.

29. ibend

Posts: 6747; Member since: Sep 30, 2014

is that so? well maybe thats explain why score gap is so big between 5.7 and 6.0 in Antutu 5.7 -> S6 get 70k while i6s get 60k in Antutu 6.0 -> S6 get 80k while i6s get 100k+

33. may_czos

Posts: 955; Member since: Nov 22, 2014

Exactly that's why - new Antutu favours single core performance that's why there's a huge gap - iPhone bases its performance on few powerful cores.

45. marorun

Posts: 5029; Member since: Mar 30, 2015

Benchmark dont give real life usage. In real life same app open faster on the S6 than iphone 6S. In real life multitasking is faster and better on most android phone than iphone 6S. Benchmark since a few year are starting to be crappy. first you have OEM thats tweak phone to find out its running a benchmark and overclock itself. Then you have company getting paid or good deal in the shadow to tweak benchmark to work better on some phone or platform.

9. alaw.14

Posts: 426; Member since: Sep 10, 2013

Looks like i'm about to get paid.

15. Avishek

Posts: 46; Member since: Sep 25, 2014

You are one of that stupid jerks who choose their devices looking just at that number. Me and many other here ( i hope) are not only after the numbers. We choose smartphones to satisfy our needs. Not to show the scores in comparison with other. I am using a iphone 6 but i am ready to choose other one thats suit my needs with lesser scores. Lg v10, moto x style, g4, s6 any one of them. You better troll in other place.

63. killer7D

Posts: 551; Member since: Sep 18, 2014

You choose your device to show your friends that your are carrying iUgly ..

64. Avishek

Posts: 46; Member since: Sep 25, 2014

It was a gift and I thought to give it a try. Not just to show. And now i am keen to trade it.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.