72% of mobile network users expect their carrier to provide good performance constantly

72% of mobile network users expect their carrier to provide good performance constantly
Smartphone and tablet users might be asking too much from their mobile operators. According to a survey conducted by traffic management vendor Vasona Networks, 72% of mobile data users expect their carrier to be on top of their game all of the time, providing good data performance 24/7. Consumers are also quicker to blame their carrier when things go awry. Last year, 64% of mobile device users said that they expected their mobile carrier to be problem-free all of the time.

The survey shows that 55% of smartphone and tablet users blame their mobile network providers if an application does not run correctly. That is a pretty sharp rise from the 40% last year, who were quick to blame their mobile operator for problems with applications. 42% of those surveyed said that they would indeed recommend the carrier they use, to a friend seeking "great broadband performance." Just 9% said that they wouldn't recommend the company they currently get mobile service from. Lastly, 32% said that when choosing a mobile carrier, the quality of mobile internet performance is important. Last year, that figure was 29%


From August 7th through the 11th, 1111 people were surveyed. The answers indicate that the public is quite demanding when it comes to mobile data service, and is quick to lash out at the carriers when things go wrong. Would you consider yourself part of the majority with your attitude toward the mobile operator that keeps you connected?

source: FierceWireless

FEATURED VIDEO

17 Comments

1. 87186

Posts: 312; Member since: Aug 01, 2014

72% of mobile network users, are delusional.

7. Mxyzptlk unregistered

If you pay that much for service, then why would that be delusional?

10. Scott93274

Posts: 6038; Member since: Aug 06, 2013

Agreed. I expect top service if Verizon is going to be charging me more than other carriers. Though I'm happy to report that in the past 12 years, I haven't had any issues with the company so yeah, there's a reason why I stick with them.

15. 87186

Posts: 312; Member since: Aug 01, 2014

nothing is this wolrd is consistent. I know how technology works. I understand blackouts, crashes and when networks are running repairs and maintainence. if you think that you will have optimal service 100% of the time, then yes you are delusional. CABLE companies can't even avoid service interruptions and those are hard wired connections. we as citizens pay for services non stop. none of which are 100% guaranteed. again. delusional. maybe I'm a realist and understand this, and some people think mere money provides stability.

17. max9777

Posts: 78; Member since: Dec 11, 2011

People are like a flock of she33p, you guide them to a "good" source of grass and they go there. Great sh33p is an offensive word on PA?

2. 0xFFFF

Posts: 3806; Member since: Apr 16, 2014

100% of mobile network carriers expect their users to provide 100% payment constantly.

5. Dastrix unregistered

Because users expecting good network and service is too much to ask for... What are they on? Like seriously...

8. Finalflash

Posts: 4063; Member since: Jul 23, 2013

I know, the nerve of those bloody peons to expect an equal exchange. They should be happy with the crumbs they get from their corporate overlords.

11. seanwhat

Posts: 321; Member since: Jul 11, 2013

This post right here. Also, we all know these carriers have huge stockpiles of cash, how hard can it be for them to put up a few extra telephone poles as backups?

3. bucky

Posts: 3785; Member since: Sep 30, 2009

As long as I'm paying them full price on my bill, I expect fully functional service. If they can't provide a fully functional service as promised (and heavily advertised all over tv) then they can prorate my bill according to service provided. I have absolutely zero sympathy for them. Data costs nothing more than the electricity to run it for them. I have been over charged on data for years now in canada

4. Metropolis75

Posts: 197; Member since: Aug 28, 2012

I usually blame my phone. 1 more month till upgrade!

6. camera531

Posts: 346; Member since: Jun 30, 2012

Data is fairly reliable on 3 carriers in the US. Then there's Sprint, who charges a big premium for "4G data" which is apparently non-existant. In LA, there is no Sprint data, despite what their maps tell you. They might as well just sell basic phones, because that's all they're able to provide service for.

12. wumberpeb

Posts: 453; Member since: Mar 14, 2011

Speaking of delusional... No Sprint data anywhere in LA folks! This guy says so!

16. TheRequiem

Posts: 245; Member since: Mar 23, 2012

They got rid of those plans over a year ago, where have you been?

9. JMartin22

Posts: 2371; Member since: Apr 30, 2013

So they make you pay an exorbitant amount of money and then severely restrict you to these small data tier packages, quite frankly, my demands would be sky high considering the top two carriers in the US are ripping the value of the dollar from right under our feet.

13. Settings

Posts: 2943; Member since: Jul 02, 2014

They advertise fast, then give us fast. They advertise reliable, then give us a reliable connection. They advertise wide coverage, then give us excellent signal reception. The fact that we pay more than we can consume irritates us more with the addition of service limiting rules.

14. Sprissy

Posts: 193; Member since: Feb 11, 2012

Considering the fact that most of us in the US pay dearly for our data, I expect to get what I pay for, fast reliable service. And 99% of the time that's what I get.

Latest Stories

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. You can order presentation-ready copies for distribution to your colleagues, clients or customers at https://www.parsintl.com/phonearena or use the Reprints & Permissions tool that appears at the bottom of each web page. Visit https://www.parsintl.com/ for samples and additional information.