x PhoneArena is hiring! Reviewer in the USA

Samsung Galaxy S6 Review

Samsung Galaxy S6 9.3
Pages
Samsung Galaxy S6 Review

Samsung Galaxy S6 Review
Samsung Galaxy S6 Review
Samsung Galaxy S6 Review
Samsung Galaxy S6 Review
Samsung Galaxy S6 Review
Samsung Galaxy S6 Review
Samsung Galaxy S6 Review
Samsung Galaxy S6 Review
Samsung Galaxy S6 Review
Samsung Galaxy S6 Review
Samsung Galaxy S6 Review
Introduction


Almost hard to imagine it, the first-generation Samsung Galaxy S came into light back in the summer of 2010. Back then, the competition in the smartphone market was largely dominated by the iPhone. Over in the Android space, there were a few notable Android devices making some noise as well, such as the HTC EVO 4G, Sony Xperia X10, and Motorola DROID to name a few, but for Sammy, the launch of the original Galaxy S ushered in a new era for the Korean company – one that eventually spurred on iterative devices that proved to be more and more impressive.

Subsequently, it was the arrival of the Samsung Galaxy S III that transformed the company into what it is presently – a force to be reckoned with, and one that also pushes hard for innovation. That phone sparked successive phones that kept on rolling the momentum forward, as both the Galaxy S4 and S5 proved to be hits amongst consumers. Through it all, Samsung’s flagship line didn’t deviate much from the distinct design language first employed by the original.

Surprise came during Mobile World Congress 2015, when Samsung officially unveiled its latest flagship smartphone – the totally redesigned Samsung Galaxy S6. Looking at what’s been happening in the mobile space the last year, you can say that tough competition from Apple and the various Chinese companies have whittled away at Sammy’s bottom line. Well, the Samsung Galaxy S6 aims to squash those concerns, since it’s probably the biggest shakeup in the series. Already, Samsung has been able to stir up plenty of attention with its flagship – giving rise to notion that it’s going recapture the top spot once again!

The package contains:

  • Samsung Galaxy S6
  • Wall charger
  • microUSB cable
  • Stereo headphones
  • Start Guide
  • Health & Safety and Warranty Guide
  • SIM removal tool

Design

A stark change, the new Galaxy S6 impresses on so many levels with its premium design.

What a departure! For a long time there, the Galaxy S line has always been tepid in terms of design – so it wasn’t really known for that. Of course, the decision to go with plastic constructed devices has its benefits, such as contributing to a lighter frame, but generally speaking, it lacks the premium qualities we’d want to find in a flagship smartphone. Well folks, Samsung goes 180-degrees, opting to grace the Galaxy S6 with a significantly improved design – one that finally brings in some high-quality components to give it a true high-end look and feel!

To be fair, though, this new design change first started with the Samsung Galaxy Alpha, which eventually became the design footprint for the Note 4. With those aforementioned devices, Samsung chose to add a subtle presence of premium in its designs by adding metal trim bezels. However, for the Galaxy S6, Samsung went back to the drawing board to try and deliver something immaculate and refreshing. Yes, the same metal trim bezel is back, but now it’s accompanied with glass surfaces to give it a snazzier appearance. Specifically, it’s Gorilla Glass 4 sandwiched together by that metal trim bezel – culminating to a device that’s just flat out gorgeous!

As much as we would like to say that the design is an original one, there are characteristics that draw comparisons to the iPhone 6’s design. From a profile view, the metal trim bezel, along with the arrangement of some of its ports and buttons, closely matches the styling of the iPhone 6. So it begs the question: does this new design draw inspiration from Apple’s pride and joy? That’s questionable, of course, but at the end of the day, we can agree that this is the best-designed smartphone Samsung has produced.

So far, the Galaxy S6’s new design is a breathtaking marvel, but in comparison to Sammy’s previous efforts, there were necessary compromises needed in making this phone. We can’t deny that we totally enjoy its premium feel, but it sheds some of the staple qualities of the S5 before it – like its water resistant construction, expandable microSD card slot, and removable battery. Only Samsung knows the real reason to why those things have been done away with the Galaxy S6. In comparison, the Sony Xperia Z3, which also sports a metal frame and glass surfaces, manages to keep its water resistance property and a microSD card slot... though it is a decidedly bigger phone.

In terms of its feel and comfort, the Galaxy S6 is narrower, skinnier, and lighter than its predecessor – going to show that they’re able to chip away at some things to continue making it compact. Its metal frame not only adds strength to the phone’s construction, the subtle rounded cut of it makes it feel pretty good in the hand, though it is a bit top heavy. Now, as much as we adore the premium feel of the phone, it’s just a fingerprint magnet for smudges and fingerprints. Trust us, it’s tough keeping it clean looking. Available in an assortment of colors, it’s mesmerizing how light bounces off its surfaces. Out of all the colors, the white version manages to maintain a cleaner look, just because fingerprints and smudges are less noticeable.

Looking around the phone, it’s sporting some of the same set of ports and buttons throughout its frame. The separated volume controls are placed on the left edge, the power button and SIM slot on its right, microUSB 2.0 port, 3.5mm headset jack, microphone, and internal speaker on its bottom, and finally the IR blaster and noise-cancelling mic placed on its top edge. Distinctively a Galaxy phone, the same home button is present beneath the display – flanked by the Recent Apps and Back capacitive buttons.

Fingerprint sensor


Samsung Galaxy S6 Review
Indeed, the home button incorporates the unit’s finger print sensor, but this year’s implementation is vastly better, since it now follows the operation we’ve seen employed by the iPhone. Rather than swiping down for it to register our fingerprint, all that’s needed now to unlock the phone is to gently press it over the home button. It’s simple and effortless, whereas before, it was a frustrating process at times. Getting it set up is similar to Apple’s Touch ID sensor, as we’re required to gently press our finger over the sensor multiple times – where it’s mapped entirely for accuracy.

Rounding things out, the Galaxy S6 is armed with a new 16-megapixel rear camera, which is the only thing in the back that juts out from the rest of the surrounding area – causing it to come in contact with surfaces when it’s laid down. This presents an issue - one that’s exemplified because of the handset’s top-heavy feel, just because if you’re not careful and try to prop the phone against something, there’s still a distant possibility it can fall over and somehow mess with the lens covering the camera. And finally, we find the LED flash and heart rate sensor nearby.


Samsung Galaxy S6
5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches
143.4 x 70.5 x 6.8 mm
4.87 oz (138 g)

Samsung Galaxy S6

Apple iPhone 6
5.44 x 2.64 x 0.27 inches
138.1 x 67 x 6.9 mm
4.55 oz (129 g)

Apple iPhone 6

HTC One M9
5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches
144.6 x 69.7 x 9.61 mm
5.54 oz (157 g)

HTC One M9

Samsung Galaxy S5
5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches
142 x 72.5 x 8.1 mm
5.11 oz (145 g)

Samsung Galaxy S5


To see the phones in real size or compare them with other models, visit our Visual Phone Size Comparison page.


Samsung Galaxy S6 Review

Display

Clearly pushing the envelope, this quad-HD display is not only rich with detail, but it’s the most color accurate AMOLED display to grace a phone to date.

Samsung Galaxy S6 Review
Samsung Galaxy S6 Review
Samsung didn’t stop at just the design when it comes to leaving a lasting mark on us, as the display is treated to the same level of treatment. Keeping the same screen size as its predecessor, Sammy moves forward in that incremental manner by gracing the Galaxy S6 with a drool worthy 5.1-inch 1440 x 2560 (QHD) Super AMOLED panel. In all honesty, the decision to go forward with quad-HD resolution was expected – more so when it’s increasingly becoming the resolution of choice amongst Android flagships.

Going with this, you can imagine that this leads to one staggering pixel density, we’re talking about a mark of 577 ppi! That’s mind-blowing to say the least, which leads to a display that’s rich with detail and exceptionally sharp looking. Most folks would be hard-pressed to distinguish how much more detailed this panel is than others with 1080p resolution, especially from a normal distance, but it goes to show that Samsung won’t settle for anything but being class-leading.

Besides its detail superiority, its Super AMOLED panel follows in fashion to the improvements we’ve seen exhibited already by the Note 4 – thus, shedding the inaccuracies of the Galaxy S5 display, replaced by the color accurate AMOLED panels in other more recent Samsung devices. The company’s continued fine tuning of the display technology has given the Galaxy S6 the best Super AMOLED display to date. For one, its produces a color temperature of 6550K, reaching very close to that ideal reference value of 6500K – so it’s close to hitting that perfect spot of being neither too warm or cold.

Setting the display to basic mode, as opposed to adaptive, which changes the contrast, color saturation, and other parameters depending on what’s being shown on screen, the Super AMOLED panel is extremely color accurate. It’s revealed through the color gamut chart (seen below), as each color gradient matches the reference points throughout the chart. Blues look blue, reds look red, and greens appear green – so the result here is a display with very high color accuracy.

Besting its other Galaxy brethren, we’re exposed to the brightest Super AMOLED display to date. Once known to be a poor performer under sunny conditions, Sammy has incrementally improved its display technology with each iterative device – all culminating to the result found with the S6. Emitting a pretty adequate 563 nit brightness, there’s no issue trying to visualize the screen when the sun is around. In fact, when it’s set to automatic brightness, this Super AMOLED panel reverts to its high contrast mode, which has become a standard function of recent Galaxy smartphones as well, easily eclipsing the brightness of the S5. In that mode, the display loses much of its color accuracy, but becomes way more visible.

There’s a reason why we have flagship devices, they’re supposed to be the best of the best. Thus far, the vast majority of flagships have taken the quad-HD plunge – and the Galaxy S6 goes the same way! However, most of the quad-HD screens we’ve seen have been around the 5.5-inch and up mark, but Samsung has somehow squished it into a screen that measures in at 5.1-inches. All told, it’s a beautiful-looking display that perfectly complements its new aesthetics.

Display measurements and quality

Maximum brightness (nits)Higher is better Minimum brightness (nits)Lower is better Contrast Higher is better Color temperature (Kelvins) Gamma Delta E rgbcmy Lower is better Delta E grayscale Lower is better
Apple iPhone 6 606
(Excellent)
7
(Good)
1:1563
(Excellent)
7162
(Good)
2.23
2.79
(Good)
3
(Good)
Samsung Galaxy S6 563
(Excellent)
2
(Excellent)
unmeasurable
(Excellent)
6584
(Excellent)
2.11
2.02
(Good)
2.94
(Good)
HTC One M9 508
(Excellent)
10
(Average)
1:1347
(Excellent)
8114
(Poor)
2.21
4.40
(Average)
8.24
(Poor)
Samsung Galaxy S5 442
(Good)
2
(Excellent)
unmeasurable
(Excellent)
8183
(Poor)
2.25
5.08
(Average)
7.38
(Average)
View all


130 Comments
  • Options
    Close




posted on 26 Mar 2015, 08:04 24

1. gynorm (Posts: 18; Member since: 31 Jul 2013)


9.3 is great. It's really nice to see John review this one this time around.. This device is going to be great!

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 08:49 18

29. QWERTYphone (Posts: 654; Member since: 22 Sep 2014)


NO REMOVABLE BATTERY AND MICRO SD = NO SALE

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 09:03 25

33. MrKoles (Posts: 368; Member since: 20 Jan 2013)


We heard it thousands of times already.
Buy then something with removable battery and microSD card slot.
Good luck at finding a non-chinese, wieldable phone with both. lol

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 09:08 13

35. QWERTYphone (Posts: 654; Member since: 22 Sep 2014)


You're going to hear it millions of times more because only an idiot buys a phone with no removable battery and microSD.

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 09:27 20

43. Flippyphone (Posts: 67; Member since: 15 Jul 2014)


Then there's 750 million+ idiots, because that's how many iPhones have been sold, plus there are other phones that lack removable battery and microSD. 98% of the users out there will get by with the battery life, and 98% who use a microSD only do so because they need a little more (not a ton more) storage, and that is answered with both the Cloud and Sammy offering up to 128GB. The vast majority of phone buyers don't care.

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 10:02 2

52. djorn2k (Posts: 10; Member since: 03 Sep 2014)


How many times have you change the battery on your phone? Oh about the microSD, I'll admit I am hoarder when it come to taking pictures. I just keep taking pictures without transferring them to my computer. Did I forget to mention that I have a Note 4 with a removable battery and SD slot?

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 10:03 2

53. djorn2k (Posts: 10; Member since: 03 Sep 2014)


How many times have you change the battery on your phone? Oh about the microSD, I'll admit I am hoarder when it come to taking pictures. I just keep taking pictures without transferring them to my computer. Did I forget to mention that I have a Note 4 with a removable battery and SD slot?

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 10:09 11

56. Doctorluv (Posts: 42; Member since: 30 Jun 2014)


I'm gonna be one heck of an idiot this yr, for i am getting me an EDGE!

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 14:12 12

76. MrKoles (Posts: 368; Member since: 20 Jan 2013)


No one cares about your butthurt opinion.
Millions of people will buy S6/Edge and going to be perfectly OK with the lack of the above mentioned stuff. No one is gonna force you to stick with S6.
You must have a decent life if spamming Samsung articles are the main part of your day. What about going away?
Greetings from Slovakia.

posted on 24 May 2015, 02:50

127. senseiJ (Posts: 138; Member since: 02 May 2015)


It' flopping though. Only 10 million shipments in a month..

posted on 22 Jun 2015, 06:41

129. gamblor77 (Posts: 105; Member since: 26 Apr 2012)


Still doesn't change the fact that's it's kind of a sh*tty phone. I have the 64gb regular s6 so I can say that honestly. This is the first phone I've ever purchased that became slow in the first month and hasn't gotten better. Usually it takes 1-2 years before phones are so full of junk and slow down but not this one... And I don't even have many apps installed. There are some good qualities about it like the screen and camera but nothing special that makes it worth the cost. The battery life is absolutely horrible and it's slippery to hold so I needed a case and it's actually a laggy pos most days to the point that I want to switch back to my Note 3.
If I had the choice again I would have got the S5 for $0 rather than the S6 for $360. Pretty sure Samsung's advertising budget paying off all the tech sites to say good things really suckered me in this time. I probably won't buy another Samsung phone honestly... this is my 5th Galaxy device and likely my last.

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 17:51 1

80. aleksey4738 (Posts: 10; Member since: 27 Apr 2013)


you are a big idiot. lol. who carries an extra battery now in days? thats why juice packs are for.

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 18:05

82. peacekeeper05 (Posts: 33; Member since: 23 Apr 2012)


Okay. You can call me IDIOT all you want while I enjoy my beautiful and fast Galaxy S6.

posted on 27 Mar 2015, 11:05

95. refillable (Posts: 1045; Member since: 10 Mar 2014)


So calling me an idiot is your best comeback? No. You are an idiot and you should shut up.

posted on 27 Mar 2015, 11:09

96. refillable (Posts: 1045; Member since: 10 Mar 2014)


I think non expandable memory should be noted at the end. Fair review to be honest. Decent design, great speed, great camera, great features, great screen, nice software and a great phone overall.

The 9.3 is well deserved.

posted on 21 Apr 2015, 17:47

119. TMach (Posts: 452; Member since: 29 Dec 2011)


I am not particularly bothered by removable battery or Micro SD Card, I managed to get hold of a 128GB version (Black Sapphire) which is plenty good for me. One glitch, however, the battery life is so bad, it really sucks and that is coming from a real life perspective. Grabbed one from an online retailer, European version as I am UK based, set it up and marvelled at that screen and the camera is pretty epic. Here's the downer, not a single phone call or text message, admittedly spent maybe 30 - 40 mins browsing but the battery was down at 39% by 5 PM and clearly was not going to get me through the day. My Nexus 6 with similar use would still be up at around 85%! By my standards, simply a no go so it is now on eBay for any interested UK or European buyer to acquire. Perhaps, I was spoilt by LG G2, G3 and Z3 which were my previous phones prior to the Nexus 6 but even the N6's battery seriously outlasts the S6 in real life use. Sorely disappointed......so keen to get rid, I will happily suck up the loss on price!

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 12:24 2

69. faddi (Posts: 29; Member since: 11 Feb 2015)


HTC One M9, LG G4 and Sony Xperia Z3.

None are Chinese.

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 20:47 1

85. npaladin2000 (Posts: 165; Member since: 06 Nov 2011)


None have a removable battery.

posted on 29 Mar 2015, 17:25 1

108. ChunkDiesel072014 (Posts: 39; Member since: 26 Feb 2015)


Lg g4 might LG G 3 probably did

posted on 28 Mar 2015, 00:59

99. coldspring22 (Posts: 305; Member since: 28 Feb 2015)


what is non-chinese phone? There is no such beast. Apple iphone is made by Foxconn, with parts sourced mostly from asian manufacturers. Even Nokia phones are made in China. Samsung of course is Korean, but much of it's manufacturing is also done in China. So called Indian branded phones are still all manufactured by Foxconn in China.

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 09:05 7

34. WAusJackBauer (Posts: 202; Member since: 22 Mar 2015)


No removable battery is a little lame but not TOO much of a problem, but no micro SD card slot is just a stupid move.

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 09:22 3

42. maherk (Posts: 3464; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)


Everyone on this site who has read your comments before will know that no matter what, you won't be buying a Samsung phone anytime soon.
So stop wasting your energy on posting the EXACT same comment on every S6 article, you copy pasted this one to the Edge's article as well.
Stop fishing for likes kiddo.

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 10:29 2

57. waddup121 (unregistered)


9.3...hell yeah thats s great score. Great job for a great flaghship.

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 20:11 2

83. jphillips63 (Posts: 218; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)


Hell forget about the removable battery and SD card, look at that butt ugly protruding camera on the back.

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 20:14

84. jphillips63 (Posts: 218; Member since: 04 Jan 2012)


Double post sorry

posted on 01 Apr 2015, 10:52

110. DonkeySauce (Posts: 194; Member since: 03 Dec 2011)


Rumors are there will be an S6 Sport that will have removable battery and card slot.

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 08:06 9

2. ghaniosman (Posts: 78; Member since: 06 Jun 2013)


s6 all the way this year

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 08:07 4

3. ishaqthkr (Posts: 24; Member since: 26 Mar 2015)


Note 5: b***h please

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 08:08 7

4. ishaqthkr (Posts: 24; Member since: 26 Mar 2015)


9.3...typical PA rating.

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 08:13

7. elitewolverine (Posts: 5111; Member since: 28 Oct 2013)


Did you really expect them to give it anything below a 9?

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 08:17

10. drunkenjay (Posts: 860; Member since: 11 Feb 2013)


and whys that?

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 12:29

70. elitewolverine (Posts: 5111; Member since: 28 Oct 2013)


Look at their rating scale, 9+ means everything is superb.

When PA cant even follow its own scale, cause not everything is superb on it, then yes, biased rating and very typical.

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 08:37

23. walkman800 (Posts: 113; Member since: 26 Aug 2014)


I think that's a fair rating. Anything below 9 would be unfair.

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 08:10 6

5. MrKoles (Posts: 368; Member since: 20 Jan 2013)


The best! ♥ Absolutely fantastic...

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 08:12 4

6. phljcnth (Posts: 481; Member since: 30 Apr 2012)


Wow! 9.3! I wonder what PA will give to the S6 Edge. Good job Sammy!

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 08:14 4

8. fyahking (Posts: 859; Member since: 28 Jan 2015)


Something is wrong with the geekbench score there.

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 08:19 1

12. arch_angel (Posts: 1651; Member since: 20 Feb 2015)


ikr its normally higher than that they need to run it again. single core 1500 multi 5000 is the normal score.

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 09:22 1

41. Neros (Posts: 1016; Member since: 19 Dec 2014)


And antutu just look at the results of s6 edges - 69K in antutu.

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 08:15 5

9. TylerGrunter (Posts: 1514; Member since: 16 Feb 2012)


If I were PA I would repeat the Geekbench 3 test. It looks like something went wrong with it, the "normal" scores for galaxy S6 are>
single-core> 1450
multi-core> 5000
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/search?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=+%09samsung+SM-G925F

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 08:27 3

15. fyahking (Posts: 859; Member since: 28 Jan 2015)


That's what I'm saying, it's like the 810 is on part with the Exynos now. The score is like 40% less on jere. Phonearena has the audacity to release it?lol

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 08:36 3

22. JMartin22 (Posts: 1937; Member since: 30 Apr 2013)


They don't care about journalistic integrity

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 08:39 2

25. bucky (Posts: 2470; Member since: 30 Sep 2009)


ur right. you should just find another website.

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 11:15

62. seven7dust (unregistered)


Not every benchmark scores the same everytime , sometimes it's lower or higher, depends on a lot of things.

Either-way why give so much importance to benchmarks , they gave the phone high marks for day to day performance , which is what matters to most normal people.

if your a enthusiast read anandtechs detailed preview with is more indepth and comapres with other top chips{Nvidia tegras , Apple A8X etc} , not just crappy snapdragons.

I dunno if I'm allowed to post a link
but just google it.

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 12:31

71. TylerGrunter (Posts: 1514; Member since: 16 Feb 2012)


I´m also reading Anandtech.
My only point was that if one of your benchmarks is giving "odd" results you should go back and retest it, not just post the first result you get.
Other sites are giving the right figures, and even the S6 Edge here with the same SoC does. So I think it makes sense that they retest before posting:
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s6-review-1227p5.php

It may be the case that the unit they tested is faulty or something. But they should try to dig deeper when these kind of issues are spotted.

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 09:37 3

46. MrET1 (Posts: 110; Member since: 29 Jan 2015)


Well they messed up the whole benchmark section.

Showing the lowest antutu score one can get using the S6 vs the highest one can get on the M9. Also judging the GPU as slower than the adreno 430 by showing the onscreen score only while the offscreen score shows that they perform the same numbers on 1080p.
And the Geekbench run has failed bad.

I've recently had my hands on a preview S6 in a Samsung store and it scored ~71k in antutu and ~1500/5500 in Geekbench so I find this rather weird.

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 09:53 4

50. Niva. (Posts: 418; Member since: 05 Jan 2015)


Why would anyone care about the offscreen score? Do you use your phone by hauling a monitor around everywhere? Sorry I completely disagree with that logic. They made a choice for the 1440p display and users will have to live with the impacts of that decision, that's one of the drawbacks.

Also there's some questions about the benchmarks scores in general, like the CPU scores... I'm curious on those too. I doubt they published bad scores on purpose, so far it seems that thsi thing has the best CPU around. Lets wait and see what they say.

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 11:15 2

63. TyrionLannister (unregistered)


No game runs on QHD except the benchmarks. The question should be, why should I care about onscreen?

It'll still take 1-2 years for games to render at that resolution. And those games will be like 5-6 GB in size.

Games still run mostly on 1080p or 720p. I believe off screen performance is more important regarding real life usage.

You should check anandtech. Even they mention the thing I'm mentioning right now in their s6 preview.

Peace.

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 12:34

72. TylerGrunter (Posts: 1514; Member since: 16 Feb 2012)


Even if the games are renderes at 1080p, the GPU needs to fill out all the pixels of the screen after the upscaling. So it makes sense to put the on-screen tests when you are reviewing a device.
Off-screen if you want to review a SoC, but on-screen for a device.

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 12:53 1

74. TyrionLannister (unregistered)


Nope, it just upscales. It's a far cry from rendering the pixels.

Rendering: the GPU has to calculate the pixel values from the textures and polygons. Take a lot of hard work.

Interpolation/upscaling: it's constant factor regardless of game and depends on resolution. It's usually handled by display controller. For example, for a QHD display it's about 3.7 million *60 fps = about 200 million integer calculations per second. That's not even a 1% overhead for the modern machines which can do hundreds of billions of calculations persecond.

For example, it's similar to when you tone down resolution on your desktop to get more fps. Even then it has to fill the pixels but still the frame rate is higher. Also, see that there's almost no difference between the off screen and on screen scores on1080p phomes but they have to actually fill the screen in latter.

I hope you got it. I also have real life examples to show that the real life performance of QHD phones are equivalent to off screen performances. :)

posted on 27 Mar 2015, 07:52

90. TylerGrunter (Posts: 1514; Member since: 16 Feb 2012)


I would like to see those examples.
I knew already what is rendering and what interpolating, but no issue about that.
What I am worried about is that the games can find a bottleneck in the ROPs and not in the shaders. But I would love to realise if I'm wrong there.
As far as I know GFXBench is so shader performance oriented that the FPS is only affected by them as they are always the bottleneck, but not so with other games and/or benchmarks.

posted on 27 Mar 2015, 09:35

92. TyrionLannister (unregistered)


Here's the asphalt 8 framerate:

http://www.gamebench.net/blog/samsung-galaxy-note-4-beats-every-other-phone-asphalt-8

See how the Note 4 has almost twice the frame-rate of Note 3 despite having identical scores home screen.

And yes, the GFXBench is a 'pure' GPU benchmark and more ALU power shows up in GFXBench 3.1

posted on 27 Mar 2015, 09:48

93. TylerGrunter (Posts: 1514; Member since: 16 Feb 2012)


But your own link is actually saying I'm right in my worries.
Take the LG G3 (SN801) and the Note 3 (SD800). The former has the better SoC and GPU but due the higher screen resolution it also has the worse performance.
That's the kind of effect I am referring to. Yes, the hit on performance is not that high, but you have to admit that it does exist and that the SD801 has a slighly better GPU than the SD800.

posted on 27 Mar 2015, 09:52

94. TyrionLannister (unregistered)


It's not the SoC. Actually the LG's power management underclocks the chip and hence it gets almost equal to a SD 800. See G3 benchmarks. It does pretty poorly compared to other SD 801 phones.

LG should not be talked about in performance.

posted on 10 May 2015, 11:29

125. krakmh786 (Posts: 4; Member since: 10 May 2015)


Rendering: the GPU has to calculate the pixel values from the textures and polygons. Take a lot of hard work.

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 11:21

65. MrET1 (Posts: 110; Member since: 29 Jan 2015)


You should care about offscreen score since that renders in 1080p and games render in 1080p too even on a 1440p screen. Do you think that game developers choose for their games to run at low framerates? The only 3D applications that run in 1440p on a 1440p screen are benchmarks since they are ment to push a device to its limits

posted on 28 Mar 2015, 15:45

103. Taters (banned) (Posts: 6474; Member since: 28 Jan 2013)


It speaks to the value. That is why I can't stand Apple fans, they don't get that they are getting ripped off big time. Whether or not you care for the off screen prowess or not, it's still more $$$$ to manufacture an off screen monster than it is to manufacture an on screen monster that is sub 1080p.

So when you look at the GS6 for $750 vs the iphone 6 for $750, the value alarm bells should be tingling off the charts if one of them has a poor off screen score.

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 10:04 1

54. Neros (Posts: 1016; Member since: 19 Dec 2014)


Except htc is cheating and using benchmark detection script that boosts the cpu clock to around 2GHz. You can't go above 1.6GHz outside any benchmark as a solution to overheating. So why bother with the htc benchmarks? With lowered clock speeds you get basically an SD801-like performance in apps.

posted on 31 Mar 2015, 00:07

109. nodes (Posts: 681; Member since: 06 Mar 2014)


maybe it ran when the CPU has been throttled.

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 08:18 6

11. arch_angel (Posts: 1651; Member since: 20 Feb 2015)


The s6 is the new king of phones its just incredible to say the least.

posted on 26 Mar 2015, 08:20

13. drunkenjay (Posts: 860; Member since: 11 Feb 2013)


I dont get it. some people say the s6 is louder than the s5 and some people say the s5 is louder than the s6

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Samsung Galaxy S6

Samsung Galaxy S6

OS: Android 6.0 5.1 5.0
view full specs
Display5.1 inches, 1440 x 2560 pixels (577 ppi) Super AMOLED
Camera16 megapixels
Hardware
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa , Octa-core, 2100 MHz, ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53 processor
3 GB RAM
Size5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches
(143.4 x 70.5 x 6.8 mm)
4.87 oz  (138 g)

Latest stories