x PhoneArena is looking for new authors! To view all available positions, click here.
  • Home
  • News
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 4 pops up on Indonesian e-store with specs and price in tow

Samsung Galaxy Note 4 pops up on Indonesian e-store with specs and price in tow

Posted: , by Chris P.

Tags:

Samsung Galaxy Note 4 pops up on Indonesian e-store with specs and price in tow
Needless to say, the Samsung Galaxy Note 4's impending announcement, now confirmed to take place on September 3rd, is one of the most anxiously-expected events in the smartphone industry. The Note line has been a big winner for Samsung, and that can mostly be attributed to the fact that the company always goes full out when its premium phablet line is concerned. It's no wonder then that Note 4-related leaks have been creeping up as if from thin air, and today we have a particularly juicy one.

Popular Indonesian smartphone e-store, erafone, may have just let slip some spicy Note 4 details through a newly-discovered listing of the phablet on its pages. While the Galaxy Note 4 obviously shows up as out of stock, a rather full specs list is available, along with a price tag. 

As you can see for yourself, the Galaxy Note 4 will apparently come with a 5.7-inch, 1440 x 2560 pixel resolution (Quad HD) Super AMOLED display, and will be powered by two processors, depending on the version -- either a 2.5GHz, quad-core Snapdragon 805 (SM-N910S) or an octa-core Exynos 5433 with four 1.3GHz Cortex-A53 and four Cortex-A57 cores (SM-N910C). If these specs prove to be the real deal, then the Note 4 is also on path to becoming the first Android device with 4GB of RAM, not to mention that the 16-megapixel camera will apparently sport an OIS gizmo (Optical Image Stabilizaiton). The phone is listed with a price tag the equivalent of around $817 (IDR 9,499,000).

The rest of the spill suggests that there will be three storage options for the Note 4 -- 16/32/64GB -- all with support for expansion through a microSD card (up to 128GB). The Note 4 will also apparently tout support for Bluetooth 4.0, MHL 2, and microUSB v3.0, and will be powered by Android 4.4.3 KitKat upon launch. Unfortunately, the listing makes no mention of the battery to be found inside the Note 4, nor its dimensions, not to mention that the photo of the phone seems to be a skinned render of the Note 3 with the new TouchWiz lockscreen slapped on top, so three very important details are still shrouded in mystery.

Samsung Galaxy Note 4 pops up on Indonesian e-store with specs and price in tow

Obviously, do keep in mind that we have no way of confirming the above information. That said, with just a little over half a month left until Samsung takes to the stage, it's plausible that retailers and select third parties would already have an insider scoop on Samsung's next big-hitter. Time will tell, so stay tuned!

source: erafone via TeknoUp

123 Comments
  • Options
    Close




posted on 14 Aug 2014, 05:07 31

1. Anshulonweb (Posts: 348; Member since: 07 Feb 2014)


welcome the beast.....

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 05:24 4

8. AwesomestMaximuss (Posts: 121; Member since: 09 Jul 2013)


Ups..

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 07:43 2

66. Droid_X_Doug (Posts: 5921; Member since: 22 Dec 2010)


Not sure about the 4Gb of RAM. I suspect what is on the website is just what the vendor thinks will be the spec listing. We will have the official answer soon enough, though.

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 07:51 8

68. SuperAndroidEvo (Posts: 4336; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)


Why? Samsung had 3GB in the Note 3. I think one year later they can add one more GB right?

Who knows, but to me this phone is a winner. I am going to be sure to buy the Developer Edition though.

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 12:00 2

91. Jeradiah3 (Posts: 1008; Member since: 11 Feb 2010)


I must say that the Note 4 is a very attractive phone to have right now. I'll admit that I'm not as excited as I was for the Note 3, but the Note 4 is my new must-have smartphone over the note 3. My only concern right now is the design and if its appealing then......*sigh*.......I'd have to renew my contract with AT&T to get the Note 4 lol

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 12:15

92. RandomUsername (Posts: 529; Member since: 29 Oct 2013)


4GB is useless with 32 bit.

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 13:20 2

95. SemiFinal (Posts: 57; Member since: 26 Jul 2014)


Not really, 32 bit can handle a little over that. 2 to the power of 32 is 4,294,967,296.

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 15:14 1

105. SuperAndroidEvo (Posts: 4336; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)


Not really. Ram is great for multi-tasking. The more the better!

posted on 26 Aug 2014, 12:31

125. RandomAshole (Posts: 30; Member since: 15 Apr 2014)


Just exactly what I thought first, (that goes for both your id and your comment) :)

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 08:58 13

78. joseanand (Posts: 1; Member since: 14 Aug 2014)


Note 1 = 1 GB RAM
Note 2 = 2 GB RAM
Note 3 = 3 GB RAM
Note 4 = 4 GB RAM??

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 10:29 2

86. ojdidit84 (Posts: 408; Member since: 16 Jul 2011)


I can believe 4GB of RAM before I can get with Android 4.4.3 when the Alpha has 4.4.4.

Someone also said that this particular spec sheet has been floating around for a while on the net so who knows.

I've been waiting for an official announcement to see what will really be there and I may spring for a Google experience version this time around.

posted on 21 Aug 2014, 23:10

114. engineer-1701d (Posts: 1140; Member since: 13 Mar 2014)


plus we know from the gsmarena leak that the ois camera is a 16 ois and a new 3.2 front with wide angle and a software dedicated touch sensor on the side. plus we know its going to be a min of 4.4.4 if not the first offical android l

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 08:57 3

77. aksa123 (Posts: 229; Member since: 30 Jan 2014)


Indeed beastly price duh !!!

posted on 21 Aug 2014, 23:06

113. engineer-1701d (Posts: 1140; Member since: 13 Mar 2014)


its fake its a note 3 listing they want publicity they said specs but no battery size and the specs are all the specs we have know about from ois to cores, and qhd. wish it was real news but its fake.

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 05:07 8

2. aayupanday (Posts: 520; Member since: 28 Jun 2012)


This beast is gonna Annihilate the competetion.
Hope it has the same design of the Alpha.
Although I'm still confused about the 4GB RAM.

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 05:36 5

16. JakeLee (banned) (Posts: 1021; Member since: 02 Nov 2013)


It will fail worse than GS5.

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 07:53 5

69. SuperAndroidEvo (Posts: 4336; Member since: 15 Apr 2011)


The Note Series officially after the Note 2 has been Samsung's flagship. The GS5 is not the flagship. The Note series is their bread & butter. It will not fail. It hasn't yet!

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 15:59 3

107. PAPINYC (banned) (Posts: 2315; Member since: 30 Jul 2011)


Yep, finally, someone with some sense! +1

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 16:00

108. bonsly16 (Posts: 57; Member since: 23 Oct 2011)


Huh? Based on sales and advertising, the Galaxy is still the flagship phone of Samsung Mobile. Maybe when the Note 4 releases.

posted on 21 Aug 2014, 23:17 1

115. engineer-1701d (Posts: 1140; Member since: 13 Mar 2014)


so much truth here that apple got scared and said there making fun of me steve , woz what can i do, oh yeah steal the android phones looks and size and pretend to be a big dog yapping with its little 1 gig ram baby battery, little res thats what she said, and copy nfc if they can get it right and call it all new innovation!!!!!!!!!!!!! yeah look what i did, pos apple is a big app drew thats all so messy just pages and copied folders and app after app to make up for the lame phone that costs more then all the rest and a company that prey on the stupid thanks to marketing.

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 08:43 1

76. xfire99 (Posts: 565; Member since: 14 Mar 2012)


But it wont fail as much compared to u.

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 08:04

73. Berzerk000 (Posts: 4104; Member since: 26 Jun 2011)


These specs are nonsense. Not even Samsung with their infinite variations would go as far as making a 32 bit and 64 bit Note 4; especially since the 32 bit wouldn't be able to use all the RAM. If they do end up with that, all faith in Samsung is lost for me.

Galaxy Note 4 variants:
32 bit Snapdragon
64 bit Exynos
64 bit Snapdragon when the 810 releases
Galaxy Note 4 Edge with a curved display
Note 4 Neo
Note 4 LTE-A
Note 4 Neo LTE-A

Samsung is going downhill quickly. Their designs suck except for the Alpha (which still isn't even that great), their software sucks, and all these hardware variations under the same brand are getting out of control. They need flagship tier specs to compensate for Touchwiz, and even then it's still noticeably slower than the Nexus or other skins when multitasking.

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 08:58 2

79. Arte-8800 (banned) (Posts: 4562; Member since: 13 Mar 2014)


IPhone's look hideous than Samsung phones

Big bezels

Big round curves

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 13:21

96. pulkit1 (Posts: 325; Member since: 03 Jul 2014)


Again you have proven me right that you are a mindless freak-show .
When did he ask you about iPhone ? did he even mention iPhone ?

posted on 21 Aug 2014, 23:19 1

116. engineer-1701d (Posts: 1140; Member since: 13 Mar 2014)


yes you lame pul kit above jakelee you and he need to get a room.

posted on 22 Aug 2014, 12:10

122. pulkit1 (Posts: 325; Member since: 03 Jul 2014)


don't put your stupid nose where it does not belong , read properly why i behaves like that .

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 13:50

103. dontneedtoknow (Posts: 152; Member since: 17 Feb 2014)


Better than cheap samsung s**t! i would own any other android device if I hadn't bought Samsung smart tv, It makes it convenient also the camera is pretty good.

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 05:12 3

4. xperiaDROID (banned) (Posts: 5629; Member since: 08 Mar 2013)


This is just an overwhelming beast, my probably first Samsung phone is getting nearer now.

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 05:13

5. Zomer (Posts: 73; Member since: 31 May 2013)


Can you use 4GB RAM in combination with a 32-bit chipset?

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 05:35 1

14. kassi (Posts: 85; Member since: 25 May 2013)


it was possible on PCs, you get only 3.8GB or 3.9 GB anyway.

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 05:40

18. power_x (Posts: 238; Member since: 28 Aug 2013)


You would get 3.75 as android system is always taking a quarter gig

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 05:36 2

15. azalucel (Posts: 90; Member since: 27 Dec 2013)


Yes linux with pae can use more ram and since android is built on linux it should be possible

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 13:08

94. yowanvista (Posts: 309; Member since: 20 Sep 2011)


It's possible with PAE on x86 and LPAE on ARM (Cortex-A15 onwards).

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 05:22

6. Roland_ (Posts: 4; Member since: 25 Jun 2014)


That site Erafone is just spamming the web with their made up specs. That pic has been around a while too.

posted on 15 Aug 2014, 02:07 1

111. pegasso (Posts: 173; Member since: 27 Nov 2011)


i doubt that.
Erafone is cellphone retailer with good reputation in Indonesia,
they wouldn't want to ruin it.

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 05:24 3

7. NationGuettaTR (Posts: 38; Member since: 28 Dec 2013)


Oops. Not buy until sammy brought us Snapdragon version. Will not fall crappy exynos again. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me.

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 05:28

9. nohatenofanboy (banned) (Posts: 515; Member since: 15 Jul 2014)


same design -__-

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 06:25 5

35. maherk (Posts: 1117; Member since: 10 Feb 2012)


Did you read the article before trolling?

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 05:28 1

10. billgates (banned) (Posts: 555; Member since: 29 May 2014)


Lol 16 GB? Should be a minimum of 32. All the other specs are solid

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 05:29

11. kkmkk (Posts: 95; Member since: 06 May 2013)


AOSP rom on this thing would be something else

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 05:29 3

12. kassi (Posts: 85; Member since: 25 May 2013)


a57 f*ck yeeessss

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 06:31

41. Iodine (Posts: 495; Member since: 19 Jun 2014)


What's so amazing about that ?

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 05:35 4

13. GreekGeek (Posts: 844; Member since: 22 Mar 2014)


To be safe, always choose the Snapdragon variant

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 05:44 1

21. swayze91 (Posts: 47; Member since: 19 Jun 2014)


Agreed.

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 05:46

22. JakeLee (banned) (Posts: 1021; Member since: 02 Nov 2013)


Absolutely.

Although I heard some good things about recent Suxynos I still don't trust Sammy.

Better stick to the last generation of 32-bit than having troubles with bogus 64bit Android.

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 05:59

25. nohatenofanboy (banned) (Posts: 515; Member since: 15 Jul 2014)


suxynos lolollolol you made my day :D

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 06:18 3

30. Arte-8800 (banned) (Posts: 4562; Member since: 13 Mar 2014)


Well the Exynos 32bit did Buttkick your A7 64bit out of the water

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 06:31 3

40. JakeLee (banned) (Posts: 1021; Member since: 02 Nov 2013)


Source?
At what clock?
Did they run 64bit routines on A7?
If yes, did the same guy write both 32/64bit codes?

Whatever, they are synthetic benchmarks heavily dependent on the algorithm/implementation and doesn't tell much.

People claiming Java to be not slow always refer to some benchmark scores.
Well, Java isn't that bad dealing with primitive data types most benchmarks concentrate on, but as soon as custom data types/classes are there, the horror begins.
And I don't have to say which data types are mostly used in real apps.

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 06:52 2

48. Wiencon (Posts: 223; Member since: 06 Aug 2014)


And yet, in real usage iP4s is less laggy than your Android.

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 07:25 4

63. Arte-8800 (banned) (Posts: 4562; Member since: 13 Mar 2014)


Because your platform is still a light halfbaked

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 07:51 5

67. AfterShock (Posts: 2900; Member since: 02 Nov 2012)


So you think your app drawer is faster?
Too bad that's all it is basically.

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 13:31

100. pulkit1 (Posts: 325; Member since: 03 Jul 2014)


again a stupid comment by the most stupid person on pa. you are comparing a 1.9ghz X 4 a7 instruction set ( geek bench :2800) to a 1.3ghz x 2 a8 instruction set ( geek bench :2580). TDP of 4.0w vs 2.3 w ( provided both running at max load under whatever the respective limits the companies have set ). A7 is the chip of the future ( you will notice the difference in couple of years when most android apps will be written for this instruction set starting with the new denver and snapdragons .)

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 05:57

24. kassi (Posts: 85; Member since: 25 May 2013)


true, when the clocks of the mali t760 in the exynos are the same as in rockchip, then the adreno 420 will even be superior.

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 06:28

37. Arte-8800 (banned) (Posts: 4562; Member since: 13 Mar 2014)


A420 losses with MaliT760

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 13:34

101. Smith12 (Posts: 3; Member since: 14 Aug 2014)


mali t760 mp16 will probably outstands even adreno 430 qualcomm gpu's are low like cpu's

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 06:35 1

44. Arte-8800 (banned) (Posts: 4562; Member since: 13 Mar 2014)


xynos chips have always tended to outperform Snapdragons released at about the same time.

Problem is that Cortex-A15 has been a dud in terms of power consumption, which is why it hasn't been seen in anything but a small percentage of mainline phones. Even in tablets where its poor power efficiency is less of an issue, Qualcomm Kraits have been dominating.

big.LITTLE helps a bit here, but the truth is - at peak performance, Krait is far more power efficient than the A15, which means that it takes longer for a Krait to hit thermal throttling limits and can run for longer on battery. What's the point of having that insane peak performance if you can't sustain it without overheating or killing the battery?

Snapdragons didn't have such a clear advantage when it came to Scorpion vs. Cortex-A9, or even dual-Krait vs. quad-A9 which is why Exynos 4210 and 4412 dominated Samsung's handset lineup in their heyday - but the A15 has been a failure outside of the tablet and Chromebook market.

Samsung will claim the reason for Krait dominating their handset lineup is LTE in public documentation, but the Note 2 and international LTE GS3 (I9305) proved that Samsung can hang a Qualcomm LTE modem off of an Exynos CPU.

Specs are the same

The Cpu, Gpu destroys the S805, let alone S801.

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 06:47

46. JakeLee (banned) (Posts: 1021; Member since: 02 Nov 2013)


In short, Suxynos sucked.
You are just listing excuses for Suxynos' lackluster performance, and for whatever the reason, the fact remains : it sucked. It was and is a mistake for the consumers to choose Suxynos over SD.

And obviously you don't know a thing about SoC.

Lesson 1:
SoC =/= CPU

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 06:55 1

49. Arte-8800 (banned) (Posts: 4562; Member since: 13 Mar 2014)


Jealous iBoy

Snapdragon still relying on pos A9 modified.

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 07:01 3

52. JakeLee (banned) (Posts: 1021; Member since: 02 Nov 2013)


Where did you read that crap?

Did you check the instruction cycle timings?

Krait is clearly optimized CA15.

You ALWAYS ctrl+c/v from somewhere else.

You only talk about CPU/GPU/Modem. SoC is FAR more than that.

posted on 14 Aug 2014, 07:04 1

54. Arte-8800 (banned) (Posts: 4562; Member since: 13 Mar 2014)


Go and drive your Pos 2.0litre engine car, while others enjoy driving big heavy loaded 4.0 litre.

* Some comments have been hidden, because they don't meet the discussions rules.

Want to comment? Please login or register.

Latest stories